This study investigates political decisions and epidemiological developments. Employing a quantitative approach, this paper examines proportions of votes advocating Brexit with the proportional rates of Covid-19 vaccinations among individuals aged 18 years and above. A discernible pattern suggests a link between lower vaccination rates and pro-Brexit inclinations. This research finds a correlative relationship between political behaviour in voting for Brexit, and epidemiological outcomes measured by the uptake of vaccinations among various urban centres, towns, and local governmental jurisdictions within the United Kingdom. However, the results also show socioeconomic control variables are statistically more significant in predicting vaccination rates.
AvdagicSSedelmeierU (2023) Issue framing, political identities, and public support for multilateral vaccine cooperation during Covid‐19. European Journal of Political Research.
2.
BalakrishnanVNgWZSooMC, et al. (2022) Infodemic and fake news–A comprehensive overview of its global magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021: a scoping review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction: IJDRR78: 103144.
BonacchiCAltaweelMKrzyzanskaM (2018) The heritage of Brexit: roles of the past in the construction of political identities through social media. Journal of Social Archaeology18(2): 174–192.
5.
BoucherJCCornelsonKBenhamJL, et al. (2021) Analyzing social media to explore the attitudes and behaviors following the announcement of successful COVID-19 vaccine trials: infodemiology study. JMIR Infodemiology1(1): e28800.
6.
British Medical Journal (January 2021) Too Little, Too Late: Social Media Companies’ Failure to Tackle Vaccine Misinformation Poses a Real Threat. London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
7.
CopelandPMaccaferriM (2023) The UK, the EU, and COVID-19: media reporting, the recontextualisation of Eurosceptic discourse, and the fait accompli of Brexit. Politics43(1): 70–88.
8.
De VriesC (2017) Benchmarking Brexit: how the British decision to leave shapes EU public opinion. Journal of Communication and Media Studies: Journal of Common Market Studies55(S1): 38–53.
9.
DoreyP (2017) Towards exit from the EU: the conservative party’s increasing Euroscepticism since the 1980s. Politics and Governance5(2): 27–40.
10.
DumbrellJ (2017) A Special Relationship: Anglo-American Relations from the Cold War to Iraq. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
11.
EntmanRM (2007) Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication57(1): 163–173.
12.
EttiMFofieHRazaiM, et al. (2021) Ethnic minority and migrant underrepresentation in Covid-19 research: causes and solutions. EClinicalMedicine36: 100903.
FreemanDaniel, et al. (2022) Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine52(2).
15.
GaberIFisherC (2022) “Strategic lying”: the case of Brexit and the 2019 UK election. The International Journal of Press/Politics27(2): 460–477.
16.
GlencrossA (2016) Why the UK Voted for Brexit: David Cameron’s Great Miscalculation. Berlin: Springer.
17.
GuoYKaniukaARGaoJ, et al. (2022) An epidemiologic analysis of associations between county-level per capita income, unemployment rate, and COVID-19 vaccination rates in the United States. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(3): 1755.
18.
HalvorsrudKShandJWeilLG, et al. (2023) Tackling barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in London: a mixed-methods evaluation. Journal of Public Health45(2): 393–401.
19.
HuaJShawR (2020) Corona virus (Covid-19) “infodemic” and emerging issues through a data lens: the case of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(7): 2309.
20.
HuldinD (2021) Twitter - Polarising Europe in the Era of Misinformation: A Case Study of Brexit. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
21.
JenningsWStokerGValgarðssonV, et al. (2021a) How trust, mistrust and distrust shape the governance of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of European Public Policy28(8): 1174–1196.
22.
JenningsWStokerGBuntingH, et al. (2021b) Lack of trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social media use predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines9(6): 593.
23.
KerrJRoozenbeekJSchneiderRC (2020) Susceptibility to Misinformation About COVID-19 Around the World. London: The Royal Society Publishing, Vol. 7.
24.
KingW.CRubinsteinMReinhartAMejiaR.J (2021) Time trends and factors related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy from January-May 2021 among US adults: findings from a large-scale national survey. medRxiv.
25.
LazarusJVRatzanSCPalayewA, et al. (2021) A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature Medicine27(2): 225–228.
26.
LockyerBIslamSRahmanABradford Institute for Health Research Covid-19 Scientific Advisory Group, et al. (2021) Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy24(4): 1158–1167.
27.
MachidaMNakamuraIKojimaT, et al. (2021) Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines9(3): 210.
28.
McKeeMDiethelmP (2010) How the growth of denialism undermines public health. BMJ341: c6950.
29.
MontagniIOuazzani-TouhamiKMebarkiACONFINS group, et al. (2021) Acceptance of a Covid-19 vaccine is associated with ability to detect fake news and health literacy. Journal of Public Health43(4): 695–702.
30.
MuricGWuYFerraraE (2021) COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on social media: building a public Twitter data set of antivaccine content, vaccine misinformation, and conspiracies. JMIR public health and surveillance7(11): e30642.
31.
MusolffA (2017) Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics16(5): 641–657.
32.
NaeemSBBhattiRKhanA (2021) An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk. Health Information and Libraries Journal38(2): 143–149.
33.
OpelDJLoBPeekME (2021) Addressing mistrust about COVID-19 vaccines among patients of color. Annals of Internal Medicine174(5): 698–700.
34.
PerloffRM (1993) Third-person effect research 1983–1992: a review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research5(2): 167–184.
35.
RawlinsonF (2020) How Press Propaganda Paved the Way to Brexit. Germany: Springer International Publishing.
36.
RoneJ (2023) “Enemies of the people”? Diverging discourses on sovereignty in media coverage of Brexit. British Politics18(4): 519–537.
37.
SimioneLVagniMGnagnarellaC, et al. (2021) Mistrust and beliefs in conspiracy theories differently mediate the effects of psychological factors on propensity for COVID-19 vaccine. Frontiers in Psychology12: 683684.
38.
SpencerAOppermannK (2021) Narrative genres of Brexit: the Leave campaign and the success of romance. The Brexit Policy Fiasco. Milton Park: Routledge, 18–36.
39.
StoeckelFCarterCLyonsBA, et al. (2022) The politics of vaccine hesitancy in Europe. The European Journal of Public Health32(4): 636–642.
40.
TanjaniPTBabanejadMNajafiF (2015) Influenza vaccination uptake and its socioeconomic determinants in the older adult Iranian population: a national study. American Journal of Infection Control43(5): e1–e5.
41.
ViskupičFWiltseDLMeyerBA (2022) Trust in physicians and trust in government predict COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Social Science Quarterly103(3): 509–520.
42.
WalterS (2016) Crisis politics in Europe: why austerity is easier to implement in some countries than in others. Comparative Political Studies49(7): 841–873.
43.
WangYByeJBalesK, et al. (2022) Understanding and neutralising covid-19 misinformation and disinformation. Bmj379: e070331.
44.
WoodheadCOnwumereJRheadR, et al. (2022) Race, ethnicity and COVID-19 vaccination: a qualitative study of UK healthcare staff. Ethnicity and Health27(7): 1555–1574.
45.
ZappettiniF (2021) The Brexit referendum: how trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter) national logic. “Brexit” as a Social and Political Crisis. Milton Park: Routledge, 23–39.
46.
ZappettiniFKrzyżanowskiM (eds) (2021) “Brexit” as a Social and Political Crisis: Discourses in Media and Politics. Milton Park: Routledge.
