This intervention argues that NATO needs a new strategy towards Russia. The current strategy is imbalanced because it over-emphasizes power and risks negatively affecting the European security order. A new strategy should recall the 1967 Harmel Report, which successfully combined the security elements of power, order, and liberal values. Today, such a balanced strategy is again needed. A new Harmel strategy (Harmel 2.0) should, like its predecessor, rely on a combination of deterrence and engagement. This intervention thus argues that in the realm of power, NATO needs to respond to Russia's hybrid warfare threats with conventional reassurance and societal soft power measures and that securing the Allies’ economic vulnerabilities while leaving NATO's current nuclear posture untouched will also be crucial. In the realm of order, NATO needs to re-engage on cooperative security and the instruments of arms control, and it is argued that a pause to further NATO enlargement would be helpful. Finally, in the realm of liberal values, the Allies should lower their expectations as a gesture of recognition that they cannot change the domestic situation in Russia in the short term, but they should address the attitudes of certain member states in that realm. In order to succeed with such a multi-pronged strategy, the Allies need to better coordinate their policies in the OSCE and amongst EU countries.
BullHedley (1977), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London: Macmillan.
8.
BurrWilliam, and KimballJeffrey P. (2015), Nixon's Nuclear Spectre: The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
9.
BuzanBarry (1993), ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School’, International Organization, 47(3): 327–352.
10.
BuzanBarry (2014), ‘The Historical Expansion of International Society’, in GreenDaniel M., and NavariCornelia (eds.) Guide to the English School in International Studies, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 59–75.
DaalderIvo H., FlournoyMichèle A., HerbstJohn, LodallJan, PiferSteven, StavridisJames, TalbottStrobe, and WaldCharles (2015), Preserving Ukraine's Independence, Resisting Russian Aggression: What the United States and NATO Must Do, Washington, D.C.: Atlantic Council.
DeutschKarl W. (1957), Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.
21.
DreznerDaniel W. (2008), All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
22.
The Economist (2015), ‘In the Kremlin's Pocket. Who Backs Putin, and Why’, The Economist, 14/02/2015, 414(8925): 13.
23.
EichenbergRichard C. (1993), ‘Dual Track and Double Trouble: The Two-Level Politics of INF’, in EvansPeter B., JacobsonHarold K., and PutnamRobert D. (eds.) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 45–76.
24.
EpsteinRachel A. (2005), ‘NATO Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy: Evidence and Expectations’, Security Studies, 14(1): 63–105.
GalbreathDavid (2013), ‘The Politics of European Integration and Minority Rights in Estonia and Latvia’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 4(1): 35–53.
GeorgeAlexander L. (1988), U.S.-Soviet Security Cooperation: Achievements, Failures, Lessons, New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
30.
GhébaliVictor-Yves (2002), ‘The Vienna Ministerial Council Meeting and Its Aftermath: Coping with the Russian Malaise’, in IFSH (eds.) OSCE Yearbook 2001, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 29–38.
31.
GongGerrit W. (1984), The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32.
GreenDaniel M., and NavariCornelia (2014), Guide to the English School in International Studies, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
GriecoJoseph M. (1988), ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, 42(3): 485–507.
35.
HerdGraeme P., & KriendlerJohn (2013), Understanding NATO in the 21st Century: Alliance Strategies, Security and Global Governance, London, New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
HerzJohn H. (1950), ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, 2(2): 157–180.
37.
HoffmannStanley (1986), ‘Hedley Bull and His Contribution to International Relations’, International Affairs, 62(2): 179–195.
38.
HopmannP. Terrence (2009), ‘The Future Impact of the OSCE: Business as Usual or Revitalization?’, in IFSH (eds.) OSCE Yearbook 2008, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 75–90.
39.
The International Institute for Strategic Studies (2015), The Military Balance 2015, London: Routledge.
40.
KahnHerman (1965), On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios, New York: Praeger.
41.
KelleherCatherine M. (2012), Cooperative Security in Europe: New Wine, New Bottles, College Park: CISSM.
42.
KeohaneRobert O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
43.
KeohaneRobert O., and NyeJoseph S. (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
44.
KroenigMatthew (2015), ‘Facing Reality: Getting NATO Ready for a New Cold War’, Survival, 57(1): 49–70.
45.
KühnUlrich (2009), From Capitol Hill to Istanbul: The Origins of the Current CFE Deadlock, Hamburg: IFSH.
46.
KühnUlrich (forthcoming), Cooperative Arms Control in Europe (1973–2014). A Case of Regime Decay? Dissertation submitted to the University of Hamburg, 2015.
47.
LefflerMelvyn P., & WestadOdd Arne (2010), Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume 2: Crises and Détente, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
LukinAlexander (2014), ‘Eurasian Integration and the Clash of Values’, Survival, 56(3): 43–60.
51.
MarescaJohn J. (1988), ‘Helsinki Accord, 1975’, in GeorgeAlexander L. (ed.) U.S.-Soviet Security Cooperation: Achievements, Failures, Lessons, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 106–122.
52.
MearsheimerJohn J. (2014), ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin’, Foreign Affairs, 93(5): 77–89.
MorgenthauHans J. (1954), Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Knopf.
55.
MurrayWilliamson, and MansoorPeter R. (2012), Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present, New York: Cambridge University Press.
NATO (1967), The Future Tasks of the Alliance, Report of the Council Ministerial Communiqué, Brussels, 13–14 December 1967. Available at http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67927.htm (Accessed 15/07/2015).
58.
NATO (2014), Wales Summit Declaration, Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Wales, 5 September 2015. Available at http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm (Accessed 15/07/2015).
NolanJanne E. (1994), ‘The Concept of Cooperative Security’, in NolanJanne E. (ed.) Global Engagement: Cooperation and Security in the 21st Century, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 3–18.
61.
NyeJoseph S. (1990), ‘Soft Power’, Foreign Policy, 80(3): 153–171.
62.
OSCE (1999), ‘Annex 5 (Statement on Behalf of the Russian Federation) of the Final Act of the Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe’, in OSCE Istanbul Document 1999. Available at http://www.osce.org/mc/39569?download=true (Accessed 15/07/2015).
63.
OSCE (2007), ‘Statement by the Delegation of the Russian Federation at the Extraordinary Conference of the States Parties to the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, CFE EC(07) Journal, Agenda item 2, 12 June 2007, Annex 2’.
ParkWilliam (1986), Defending the West: A History of NATO, Boulder: Westview Press.
66.
PélopidasBenoît (2015), ‘A Bet Portrayed as a Certainty: Reassessing the Added Deterrent Value of Nuclear Weapons’, in ShultzGeorge P., and GoodbyJames E. (eds.) The War that Must Never Be Fought. Dilemmas of Nuclear Deterrence, Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, pp. 5–56.
President of Russia (2014), ‘Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club’. Available at http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/23137 (Accessed 15/07/2015).
70.
Quinlan, Michael and Tanya Ogilvie-White (2011), On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan, London: Routledge.
ThomasIan Q. R. (1997), The Promise of Alliance: NATO and the Political Imagination, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
81.
TönniesFerdinand (1926), Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie, Berlin: Curtius.
82.
U.S. Department of State (2015), ‘2015 Report on Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments’. Available at http://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/rpt/2015/243224.htm#INF2 (Accessed 15/07/2015).
83.
U.S. Mission to NATO (2009), ‘09USNATO579 NATO-Russia: Responding to Russia's Latest Draft Treaty Limiting the Deployment of Troops Abroad’. Available at http://wikileaks.org/cable/2009/12/09USNATO579.html (Accessed 15/07/2015).
