Much research documents the systems of racism that undergird the rise of school choice policies and charter schools, racialized organizations that reproduce racial logics. While school choice policy gets enacted at the structural level to enable the formation of charter schools, policy also interacts with a localized neighborhood context where space must be allocated to the charter school. As race scholars show, space is itself racialized. How does this localized allocation of racial space shape intra-group dynamics in a predominantly Latinx neighborhood? Evidence for this study comes from two years of ethnographic participant-observation and informal conversations with parents in a traditional public school and a charter school in a large Northeastern city. Findings show how threats to the material boundaries of school space activate symbolic boundaries between parents from each school, drawing from racialized organizational identities of traditional public schools as representing neighborhood loyalty and anti-gentrification resistance positioned against charter schools as representing dominant whiteness, superiority, and social mobility. I conclude with a discussion of implications for broader studies of racialized space and organizations, culture, and collective action.
AndersonElijah. 2015. “The White Space.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity1(1):10–21. doi:10.1177/2332649214561306.
2.
Andre-BechelyLois. 2007. “Finding Space and Managing Distance: Public School Choice in an Urban California District.” Urban Studies44(7):1355–76. doi:10.1080/00420980701302304.
3.
BerendsMark. 2015. “Sociology and School Choice: What We Know after Two Decades of Charter Schools.” Annual Review of Sociology41(1):159–80. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340.
4.
Brown-SaracinoJaponica. 2015. “How Places Shape Identity: The Origins of Distinctive LBQ Identities in Four Small U.S. Cities.” American Journal of Sociology121(1):1–63. doi:10.1086/682066.
5.
BrunsmaDavid L.ChapmanNathaniel G.KimJoong WonLellockJ. SladeUnderhillMeganWithersErik T.WyseJennifer Padilla. 2020. “The Culture of White Space: On the Racialized Production of Meaning.” American Behavioral Scientist64(14):2001–15. doi:10.1177/0002764220975081.
6.
BullardRobert Doyle. 2007. The Black Metropolis in the Twenty-first Century: Race, Power, and Politics of Place. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BurasKristen L.2011. “Race, Charter Schools, and Conscious Capitalism: On the Spatial Politics of Whiteness as Property (and the Unconscionable Assault on Black New Orleans).” Harvard Educational Review81(2):296–331. doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.6l42343qqw360j03.
8.
BurasKristen L.2014. Charter Schools, Race, and Urban Space: Where the Market Meets Grassroots Resistance. New York: Routledge.
9.
BurawoyMichaelBurtonAliceFergusonAnn ArnettFoxKathryn J.. 1991. Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
CandipanJennifer. 2020. “Choosing Schools in Changing Places: Examining School Enrollment in Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Sociology of Education93(3):215–37. doi:10.1177/0038040720910128.
11.
ChapmanThandeka K.2018. “Segregation, Desegregation, Segregation: Charter School Options as a Return to Separate and Unequal Schools for Urban Families.” Peabody Journal of Education93(1):38–51. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2017.1403174.
12.
ChapmanThandeka K.DonnorJamel K.. 2015. “Critical Race Theory and the Proliferation of U.S. Charter Schools.” Equity & Excellence in Education48(1):137–57. doi:10.1080/10665684.2015.991670.
CorbinJ.StraussA.. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DantzlerPrentiss A.2021. “The Urban Process under Racial Capitalism: Race, Anti-blackness, and Capital Accumulation.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City2:113–34. doi:10.1080/26884674.2021.1934201.
16.
DelaneyDavid. 2002. “The Space that Race Makes.” The Professional Geographer54(1):6–14. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00309.
17.
DeSenaJudith N.2006. “‘What’s a Mother To Do?’: Gentrification, School Selection, and the Consequences for Community Cohesion.” American Behavioral Scientist50(2):241–57.
18.
DixsonAdrienne D.Rousseau AndersonCelia. 2018. “Where Are We? Critical Race Theory in Education 20 Years Later.” Peabody Journal of Education93(1):121–31. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2017.1403194.
19.
DixsonAdrienne D.BurasKristen L.JeffersElizabeth K.. 2015. “The Color of Reform: Race, Education Reform, and Charter Schools in Post-Katrina New Orleans.” Qualitative Inquiry21(3):288–99. doi:10.1177/1077800414557826.
20.
EmbrickDavid G.MooreWendy Leo. 2020. “White Space(s) and the Reproduction of White Supremacy.” American Behavioral Scientist64(14):1935–45. doi:10.1177/0002764220975053.
21.
ErtasNevbahar. 2015. “Policy Narratives and Public Opinion concerning Charter Schools.” Politics & Policy43(3):426–51. doi:10.1111/polp.12120.
22.
FoucaultMichelBouchardDonald F.. 1980. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
FullerBruce. 2009. Inside Charter Schools: The Paradox of Radical Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
GarciaDavid R.2008. “Academic and Racial Segregation in Charter Schools: Do Parents Sort Students into Specialized Charter Schools?” Education and Urban Society40(5):590–612. doi:10.1177/0013124508316044.
25.
GeertzClifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
26.
GierynThomas F.2000. “A Space for Place in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology26:463–96. doi:10.2307/223453.
27.
GoffmanErving. 1966. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Simon & Schuster.
28.
GothamKevin FoxBrumleyKrista. 2002. “Using Space: Agency and Identity in a Public-housing Development.” City & Community1(3):267–89. doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00023.
29.
GottdienerM.1993. “A Marx for Our Time: Henri Lefebvre and the Production of Space.” Sociological Theory11(1):129–34. doi:10.2307/201984.
HarveyDavid. 1990. “Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers80(3):418–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00 305.x.
32.
HaymesStephen Nathan. 1995. Race, Culture, and the City: A Pedagogy for Black Urban Struggle. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
33.
HewittPaul M.2011. “Debating Charter Schools: Why I Don’t Support Charter Schools.” School Administrator68(7):28–29.
34.
HowellJuniaKorver-GlennElizabeth. 2018. “Neighborhoods, Race, and the Twenty-first-century Housing Appraisal Industry.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity4(4):473–90. doi:10.1177/2332649218755178.
35.
HunterMarcus Anthony. 2010. “The Nightly Round: Space, Social Capital, and Urban Black Nightlife.” City & Community9(2):165–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01320.x.
36.
KohliRitaPizarroMarcosNevárezArturo. 2017. “The ‘New Racism’ of K-12 Schools: Centering Critical Research on Racism.” Review of Research in Education41(1):182–202. doi:10.3102/0091732X16686949.
37.
Ladson-BillingsGloriaTateWilliam F.. 1995. “Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education.” Teachers College Record97(1):47–68. doi:10.1177/016146819509700104.
38.
LaFleurJennifer. 2021. “The Race that Space Makes: The Power of Place in the Colonial Formation of Social Categorizations.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity7(4):512–26. doi:10.1177/2332649220961516.
39.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
40.
LefebvreHenri.1992. The Production of Space. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
41.
LewisAmanda E.DiamondJohn B.. 2015. Despite the Best Intentions: How Racial Inequality Thrives in Good Schools. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
42.
Mayorga-GalloSarah. 2018. “Whose Best Friend? Dogs and Racial Boundary Maintenance in a Multiracial Neighborhood.” Sociological Forum33(2):505–28. doi:10.1111/socf.12425.
43.
NeelyBrookeSamuraMichelle. 2011. “Social Geographies of Race: Connecting Race and Space.” Ethnic and Racial Studies34(11):1933–52. doi:10.1080/01419870.2011.559262.
44.
Olson BealHeather K.HendryPetra Munro. 2012. “The Ironies of School Choice: Empowering Parents and Reconceptualizing Public Education.” American Journal of Education118(4):521–50. doi:10.1086/666360.
45.
PattilloMary. 2015. “Everyday Politics of School Choice in the Black Community.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race12(1):41–71. doi:10.1017/S1742058X15000016.
46.
PulidoLaura. 2000. “Rethinking Environmental Racism: White Privilege and Urban Development in Southern California.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers90(1):12–40.
47.
RayVictor. 2019. “A Theory of Racialized Organizations.” American Sociological Review84(1):26–53. doi:10.1177/0003122418822335.
48.
RazackSherene.2002. Race, Space, and the Law: Unmapping a White Settler Society. Toronto, Canada: Between the Lines.
49.
ReeceRobert L.O’ConnellHeather A.. 2016. “How the Legacy of Slavery and Racial Composition Shape Public School Enrollment in the American South.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity2(1):42–57. doi:10.1177/2332649215582251.
50.
RenzulliLinda A.EvansLorraine. 2005. “School Choice, Charter Schools, and White Flight.” Social Problems52(3):398–418. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.3.398.
51.
RichPeterCandipanJenniferOwensAnn. 2021. “Segregated Neighborhoods, Segregated Schools: Do Charters Break a Stubborn Link?” Demography58(2):471–98. doi:10.1215/00703370-9000820.
52.
RielVirginia. 2021. “Siting Schools, Choosing Students? Protecting White Habitus Through Charter School Recruitment.” Sociological Forum36:1028–48. doi:10.1111/socf.12745.
53.
SaitoLeland. 2015. “From Whiteness to Colorblindness in Public Policies: Racial Formation and Urban Development.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity1(1):37–51. doi:10.1177/2332649214551096.
54.
ScottJanelle T.2011. “Market-driven Education Reform and the Racial Politics of Advocacy.” Peabody Journal of Education86(5):580–99.
55.
SeamsterLouise. 2015. “The White City: Race and Urban Politics.” Sociology Compass9(12):1049–65. doi:10.1111/soc4.12326.
56.
SeamsterLouiseHenricksKasey. 2015. “A Second Redemption? Racism, Backlash Politics, and Public Education.” Humanity & Society39(4):363–75. doi:10.1177/0160597615604926.
57.
SewellAbigail A.2016. “The Racism-race Reification Process: A Mesolevel Political Economic Framework for Understanding Racial Health Disparities.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity2(4):402–32. doi:10.1177/2332649215626936.
58.
StewartMahala Dyer. 2020. “Pushed or Pulled Out? The Racialization of School Choice in Black and White Mothers’ (Home) Schooling Decisions for Their Children.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity6(2):254–68. doi:10.1177/2332649219901130.
59.
StewartMahala DyerGarcíaAshleyPetersenHannah. 2021. “Schools as Racialized Organizations in Policy and Practice.” Sociology Compass15:e12940. doi:10.1111/soc4.12940.
60.
StovallDavid Omotoso. 2013. “Against the Politics of Desperation: Educational Justice, Critical Race Theory, and Chicago School Reform.” Critical Studies in Education54(1):33–43. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.739192.
61.
StovallDavid Omotoso. 2016. Born Out of Struggle: Critical Race Theory, School Creation, and the Politics of Interruption. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
62.
SzaboJulia. 2022. “‘I Just Didn’t Want to Risk It’: How Perceptions of Risk Motivate Charter School Choice Among Latinx Parents.” American Educational Research Journal59:651–86. doi:10.3102/00028312221078579.
63.
UrrietaLuisJr.2006. “Community Identity Discourse and the Heritage Academy: Colorblind Educational Policy and White Supremacy.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education19(4):455–76. doi:10.1080/09518390600773197.
64.
WilsonTerri S.CarlsenRobert L.. 2016. “School Marketing as a Sorting Mechanism: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Charter School Websites.” Peabody Journal of Education91(1):24–46. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2016.1119564.
65.
ZukinSharon. 1991. Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
