Recent sociological research has addressed a wide range of attitudinal, behavioral, and sociodemographic factors that influence attitudes toward legal abortion. Young adulthood is an important life stage for the development of attitudes and behaviors that are likely to influence individuals over time. Several life course theorists in psychology, social psychology, and sociology hold views consistent with this idea. We use a cohort comparison to evaluate the extent to which attitudes among young adults vary by cohort/historical epoch. We examine the influence of religious preference and participation on support for legal abortion across three birth cohorts controlling for a range of sociodemographic variables. Using data from the General Social Survey, we compare abortion attitudes and religious predictors of these attitudes across three generational cohorts—Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Millennials. Our findings indicate (1) differences between cohorts, (2) variation in the influence of religion on abortion attitudes among young adults socialized in different time periods, and (3) consistency and inconsistency in relation to sociodemographic effects across cohorts. These findings suggest that part of the continuity of abortion debates in U.S. society reflects changes whereby young adults became less supportive of legal abortion after the Baby Boomer cohort.
AdamczykAmyValdimarsdóttirMargrét. 2018. “Understanding Americans’ Abortion Attitudes: The Role of the Local Religious Context.” Social Science Research71:129–44.
2.
AmmermanNancy. 1998. Congregation and Community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
ArnettJeffrey. 2015. Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Roads from the Late Teens through the Twenties. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
BartkowskiJohn P.Ramos-WadaAida I.EllisonChris G.AcevedoGabriel A.2012. “Faith, Race-Ethnicity, and Public Policy Preferences: Religious Schemas and Abortion Attitudes among U.S. Latinos.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion51(2):343–58.
6.
BengstonVern L.PutneyNorella M.HarrisSusan. 2013. Families and Faith: How Religion Is Passed Down across Generations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
Beynon-JonesSiân M.2015. “Re-Visioning Ultrasound through Women’s Accounts of Pre Abortion Care in England.” Gender & Society29(5):694–715.
8.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2003. Racism without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. New York: Routledge.
9.
CarolSarahMilewskiNadja. 2017. “Attitudes toward Abortion among the Muslim Minority and Non-Muslim Majority in Cross-national Perspective: Can Religiosity Explain the Differences?”Sociology of Religion78(4):456–91.
10.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2005. Black Sexual Politics: African-Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.
11.
CookKaye V.KimballCynthia N.LeonardKathleen C.BoyatzisChris J.2014. “The Complexity of Quest in Emerging Adults’ Religiosity, Well-being, and Identity.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion53(1):73–89.
12.
CottomTressie McMillan. 2017. Lower Ed: The Troubling Rise of for Profit Colleges in the New Economy. New York: The New Press.
13.
CragunRyan T.SumerauJ. Edward. 2014. “Men Who Hold More Egalitarian Attitudes toward Women Working Outside the Home in the US: Who Are They?”Human Prospect4(1):10–24.
14.
DillonMichele. 2014. “Asynchrony in Attitudes toward Abortion and Gay Rights: The Challenge to Values Alignment.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion53(1):1–16.
15.
DimockMichael. 2019. Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
16.
DunnJennifer LeighCreekS. J.2015. “Identity Dilemmas: Toward a More Situated Understanding.” Symbolic Interaction38:261–84.
17.
EasterlinRichard. 1980. Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare. New York: Basic Books.
18.
EdgellPennyFrostJacquiStewartEvan. 2017. “From Existential to Social Understandings of Risk: Examining Gender Differences in Non-religion.” Social Currents4(6):556–74.
19.
FetnerTina. 2008. How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
20.
FlahertyMichael. 2010. The Textures of Time: Agency and Temporal Experience. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
21.
GayDavidLynxwilerJohn. 1999. “The Impact of Religiosity on Race Variations in Abortion Attitudes.” Sociological Spectrum19(3):359–77.
22.
GlassJennifer L.SuttonAprilFitzgeraldScott T.2015. “Leaving the Faith: How Religious Switching Changes Pathways to Adulthood among Conservative Protestant Youth.” Social Currents2(2):126–43.
23.
ErvingGoffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor.
24.
HoffmannJohn P.JohnsonSherrie Mills. 2005. “Attitudes toward Abortion among Religious Traditions in the United States: Change or Continuity?”Sociology of Religion66(2):161–82.
25.
JelenTed G.WilcoxClyde. 2003. “Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly56(4):489–500.
26.
JonesRobert P.CoxDanielNavarro-RiveraJuham. 2014. A Shifting Landscape: A Decade of Change in American Attitudes about Same-sex Marriage and LGBT Issues. Washington, DC: Public Religion Research Institute. http://publicreligion.org/research/2014/02/2014-lgbt-survey/.
27.
KellyKimberlyGrantLinda. 2007. “State Abortion and Nonmarital Birthrates in the Post-welfare Reform Era: The Impact of Economic Incentives on Reproductive Behaviors of Teenage and Adult Women.” Gender & Society21(6):878–904.
28.
KimHyun WooMcCarthyD. John. 2018. “Accounting for the Decreasing Willingness of High School Seniors to Protest, 1976-2015.” Social Currents5(6):531–49.
KotarbaJoseph A.2012. Baby Boomer Rock “n” Roll Fans: The Music Never Ends. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
31.
LampeNikCarterShannonSumerauJ. E.2019. “Continuity and Change in Gender Frames: The Case of Transgender Reproduction.” Gender & Society33(6):865–87.
32.
LevinsonDaniel. 1986. “A Conception of Adult Development.” American Psychologist41(1):3–13.
33.
LynxwilerJohnGayDavid. 1994. “Reconsidering Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly75:67–84.
34.
MannheimKarl. 1952. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
McVeighRoryCrubaughBryantEstepKevin. 2017. “Plausibility Structures, Status Threats, and the Establishment of Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers.” American Journal of Sociology122(5):1533–71.
36.
MilkmanRuth. 2017. “A New Political Generation: Millennials and the Post-2008 Wave of Protest.” American Sociological Review82(1):1–31.
37.
MilliganMelinda J.2011. “Displacement and Identity Discontinuity: The Role of Nostalgia in Establishing New Identity Categories.” Symbolic Interaction26(3):381–403.
38.
MooreMignon R.Stambolis-RuhstorferMichael. 2013. “LGBT Sexuality and Families at the Start of the Twenty-First Century.” Annual Review of Sociology39:491–507.
NowakowskiAlexandra C. H.SumerauJ. E.A. B MathersLain. 2016. “None of the above Strategies for Inclusive Teaching with ‘Representative’ Data.” Teaching Sociology44(2):96–105.
41.
PearceLisa D.UeckerJeremy E.DentonMelinda Lundquist. 2019. “Religion and Adolescent Outcomes: How and Under What Conditions Religion Matters.” Annual Review of Sociology45:201–22.
PlummerKen. 2010. “Generational Sexualities, Subterranean Traditions, and the Hauntings of the Sexual World: Some Preliminary Remarks.” Symbolic Interaction33(2):163–90.
PurcellCarrieCameronSharonLawtonJuliaGlasierAnnaHardenJeni. 2017. “The Changing Body Work of Abortion: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Health Professionals.” Sociology of Health & Illness39(1):78–94.
46.
RichardsonLaurel. 2011. “Jeopardy: A Grandmoth-er’s Story.” Symbolic Interaction33(1): 3–17.
47.
RidgewayCecilia L.2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
48.
Rinaldo. 2013. Mobilizing Piety: Islam and Feminism in Indonesia. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
RobinsonChristine M.SpiveySue E.2007. “The Politics of Masculinity and the Ex-gay Movement.” Gender & Society21(5):650–75.
50.
Rohlinger. 2015. Abortion Politics, Mass Media and Social Movements in America. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51.
RoofWade ClarkMcKinneyWilliam. 1987. American Mainline Religion: It’s Changing Shape and Future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
52.
RyderN. B.1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review30(6):843–61.
53.
SearsDavid O.BrownChristia. 2013. “Childhood and Adult Political Development.” Pp. 59–95 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S.New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
SherkatDarren E.2001. “Tracking the Restructuring of American Religion: Religious Affiliation and Patterns of Religious Mobility, 1973-1998.” Social Forces79(4):1459–93.
55.
SherkatDarren E.Powell-WilliamsMelissaMaddoxGregoryde VriesKylan Mattias. 2011. “Religion, Politics, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in the United States, 1988–2008.” Social Science Research40(1):167–80.
56.
SmithTom W.DavernMichaelFreeseJeremyHoutMichael. 2017. General Social Surveys, 1972-2016 [Machine-readable data file]. Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigators, Peter V. Marsden and Michael Hout, NORC ed. Chicago: NORC. 1 data file (62,466 logical records) and 1 codebook (3,689 pp).
57.
SteenslandBrianRobinsonLynn D.WilcoxW. BradfordParkJerry Z.RegnerusMark D.WoodberryRobert D.2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces79(1):291–318.
58.
SumerauJ. E.CragunRyan T.2018. Christianity and the Limits of Minority Acceptance in America: God Loves (almost) Everyone (Breaking Boundaries: New Horizons in Gender & Sexualities). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
59.
SumerauJ. E.MathersLain A. B.2019. America through Transgender Eyes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
60.
SumerauJ. E.MathersLain A. B.NowakowskiAlexandra C. H.CragunRyan T.2017. “Helping Quantitative Sociology Come out of the Closet.” Sexualities20(5–6):644–56.
61.
TaylorPaul. 2014. The Next America: Boomers, Millennials, and the Looming Generational Showdown. New York: Public Affairs.
UenoKojiPena-TelamantesAbrahama E.RoachTeresaAmandaN. NixRitterLacey J.2018. “Sexuality Free Careers? Sexual Minority Young Adults’ Perceived Lack of Labor Market Disadvantages.” Social Problems65(3):305–22.
64.
WarnerMichael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: The Free Press.
65.
WestbrookLaurelSapersteinAliya. 2015. “New Categories Are Not Enough: Rethinking the Measurement of Sex and Gender in Social Surveys.” Gender & Society29(4):534–60.
66.
WoodberryRobert D.ParkJerry Z.KellstedtLyman A.RegnerusMark D.2012. “Measure of American Religious Traditions: Theoretical and Measurement Considerations.” Social Forces1(94):65–74.
67.
WorthenMeredith G. F.2013. “An Argument for Separate Analyses of Attitudes toward Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Men, Bisexual Women, MtF and FtM Transgender Individuals.” Sex Roles68(11–12):703–23.
