Sociologists frequently make use of language as data in their research using methodologies including open-ended surveys, in-depth interviews, and content analyses. Unfortunately, the ability of researchers to analyze the growing amount of these data declines as the costs and time associated with the research process increases. Topic modeling is a computer-assisted technique that can help social scientists to address these data challenges. Despite the central role of language in sociological research, to date, the field has largely overlooked the promise of automated text analysis in favor of more familiar and more traditional methods. This article provides an overview of a topic modeling framework especially suited for social scientific research. By way of a case study using abstracts from social movement studies literature, a short tutorial from data preparation through data analysis is given for the method of structural topic modeling. This example demonstrates how text analytics can be applied to research in sociology and encourages academics to consider such methods not merely as novel tools, but as useful supplements that can work beside and enhance existing methodologies.
BohrJeremiahDunlapRiley E.2017. “Key Topics in Environmental Sociology, 1990–2014: Results from a Computational Text Analysis.” Environmental Sociology4(2):181–95.
6.
ChangJonathanGerrishSeanWangChongBoyd-GraberJordan L.BleiDavid M.2009. “Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models.” Pp. 288–96 in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by BengioY.SchuurmansD.LaffertyJ. D.WilliamsC. K. I.CulottaA.22nd ed.Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
7.
CrossleyAlison Dahl. 2015. “Facebook Feminism: Social Media, Blogs, and New Technologies of Contemporary U.S. Feminism.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly20(2):253–68.
8.
CsardiGaborNepuszTamas. 2006. “The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.” InterJournal Complex Systems1695:1–9.
9.
DiMaggioPaulNagManishBleiDavid. 2013. “Exploiting Affinities between Topic Modeling and the Sociological Perspective on Culture: Application to Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Government Arts Funding.” Poetics41(6):570–606.
10.
EvansJames A.AcevesPedro. 2016. “Machine Translation: Mining Text for Social Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology42(1):21–50.
11.
FarrellJustin. 2016a. “Corporate Funding and Ideological Polarization about Climate Change.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America113(1):92–97.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDoug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
GrimmerJustinStewartBrandon M.2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis21(3):267–97.
15.
HongLiangjieDavisonBrian. 2010. “Empirical Study of Topic Modeling in Twitter.” Pp. 80–88 in Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, SOMA’10. New York: ACM.
16.
IgnatowGabeMihalceaRada. 2017. Text Mining: A Guidebook for the Social Sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
17.
IgnatowGabeMihalceaRada. 2018. An Introduction to Text Mining: Research Design, Data Collection, and Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
KingGaryLamPatrickRobertsMargaret E.2017. “Computer-Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from Unstructured Text.” American Journal of Political Science61(4):971–88.
19.
LevyKaren E. C.FranklinMichael. 2014. “Driving Regulation: Using Topic Models to Examine Political Contention in the U.S. Trucking Industry.” Social Science Computer Review32(2):182–94.
20.
LightRyanCunninghamJeanine. 2016. “Oracles of Peace: Topic Modeling, Cultural Opportunity, and the Nobel Peace Prize, 1902–2012.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly21(1):43–64.
21.
LindstedtNathan. 2018. “Shifting Frames: Collective Action Framing from a Dialogic and Relational Perspective.” Sociological Compass12(1):1–12.
22.
MimnoDavidMccallumAndrew. 2007. “Organizing the OCA: Learning Faceted Subjects from a Library of Digital Books.” Pp. 376–385 in Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL ‘07. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ACM.
23.
MohrJohn W.BogdanovPetko. 2013. “Introduction—Topic Models: What They Are and Why They Matter.” Poetics41(6):545–69.
24.
MoodyJamesLightRyan. 2006. “A View from Above: The Evolving Sociological Landscape.” American Sociologist37(2):67–86.
25.
MunsonZiad. 2010. “Mobilizing on Campus: Conservative Movements and Today’s College Students.” Sociological Forum25(4):769–86.
26.
NelsonLaura K.2017. “Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework.” Sociological Methods & Research. Published electronically November 21. doi:10.1177/0049124117729703.
27.
OberschallAnthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
RobertsMargaret E.StewartBrandon M.TingleyDustinAiroldiEdoardo M.2013. “The Structural Topic Model and Applied Social Science.” Presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Topic Models: Computation, Application, and Evaluation, December 24, Cambridge, MA.
31.
RobertsMargaret E.StewartBrandon M.TingleyDustinLucasChristopherLeder-LuisJetsonGadarianShana KushnerAlbertsonBethanyRandDavid G.2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science58(4):1064–82.
32.
SavageMikeBurrowsRoger. 2007. “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.” Sociology41(5):885–99.
33.
SmelserNeil. 1962. Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.
34.
TangJianMengZhaoshiNguyenXuanLongMeiQiaozhuZhangMing. 2014. “Understanding the Limiting Factors of Topic Modeling via Posterior Contraction Analysis.” Pp. 190–8 in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning—Volume 32, ICML’14, edited by XingE. P.JebaraT.Beijing, China: Journal of Machine Learning Research.
35.
TingleyDustin. 2017. “Rising Power on the Mind.” International Organization21:S165–S88.
36.
ValdezDannyPickettAndrew C.GoodsonPatricia. 2018. “Topic Modeling: Latent Semantic Analysis for the Social Sciences.” Social Science Quarterly99(5):1665–79.
37.
WesslenRyan. 2018. “Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Social Science: Topic Models and Beyond.” Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
38.
WhiteRobert. 2007. “‘I’m Not Too Sure What I Told You the Last Time’: Methodological Notes on Accounts from High-Risk Activists in the Irish Republican Movement.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly12(3):287–305.
39.
WhittierNancy. 2014. “Rethinking Coalitions: Anti-Pornography Feminists, Conservatives, and Relationships between Collaborative Adversarial Movements.” Social Problems61(2):175–93.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
