The Republic of Turkey provides an opportunity to examine how aspects of national culture can foster sentiments contrary to environmental mobilization. Two deeply rooted cultural values embedded at the founding of the Turkish Republic, a commitment to developmentalism and a strong suspicion of foreign interference, have served to undermine the Turkish environmental movement. Calls for environmental protection are perceived by many as foreign-inspired efforts to inhibit economic development and keep Turkey subservient to more developed nations. In addition, the Turkish case reveals how cultural division can divert attention from issues such as environmental protection. The country is characterized by sharp social boundaries between secularists and more conservative Islamists. This profound cultural divide taints all attempts at issue-based mobilization, including that around environmental protection. An analysis of interview data from 50 environmental movement leaders and government officials demonstrates how deeply held cultural values and social division serve to undermine environmental mobilization.
AdamanFikretAkbulutBengiArselMurat, eds. 2017. Neoliberal Turkey and Its Discontents. New York: I.B. Tauris.
2.
AdamanFikretArselMurat, eds. 2005. Environmentalism in Turkey. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
3.
AdemÇiğdem. 2005. “Non-state Actors and Environmentalism.” Pp. 71–86 in Environmentalism in Turkey, edited by AdamanF.ArselM.Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
4.
AkbulutBengiAdamanFikretArselMurat. 2017“The Radioactive Intertia: Deciphering Turkey’s Anti-Nuclear Movement.” Pp.175–90 in Neoliberal Turkey and its Discontents, edited by F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, and M. Arsel. New York: I.B. Tauris.
5.
AksuCemilErensüSinanEvrenErdem. 2016. Sudan Sebepler: Türkiye’de Neoliberal Su-Enerji Politikaları ve Direnişler [Politics and Resistance to the Neo-liberal Water and Energy Policies in Turkey]. Istanbul, Turkey: İletişim.
6.
Amnesty International. 2013. Gezi Park Protests: Brutal Denial of the Right to Peaceful Assembly in Turkey. London, England: Amnesty International.
7.
AndersonBenedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. New York: Verso Press.
8.
ArselMuratAdamanFikretAkbulutBengi. 2017. “‘A Few Environmentalists’? Interrogating the ‘Political’ in Gezi Park.” Pp. 190–206 in Neoliberal Turkey and Its Discontents, edited by AdamanF.AkbulutB.ArselM.New York: I.B. Tauris.
9.
AtauzAkın. 2000. “Bildiri 18: Çevreci Sivil Toplum Hareketinin Yakin Tarihi” [Presentation 18: The Near History of Environmental Civil Society Movement]. Türkiye’de Çevrenin ve Çevre Korumanın Tarihi Sempozyumu [Symposium on the History of Environment and Environmental Protection in Turkey] Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı [Turkish Economic and Societal Historical Foundation], İstanbul, Turkey, April 7–8.
10.
AvdeyevaOlga. 2007. “When do states comply with international agreements? Policies on violence against women in post-communist countries.”International Studies Quarterly51:877–900.
11.
AydınZülküf. 2005. “The State, Civil Society, and Environmentalism.” Pp. 53–70 in Environmentalism in Turkey, edited by AdamanF.ArselM.Burlington VT: Ashgate.
12.
BakerSusan. 1990. “The Evolution of the Irish Ecology Movement.” Pp. 47–82 in Green Politics One, edited by RudigW.Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University Press.
13.
BauderHarald. 2011. Immigration Dialectic: Imagining Community, Economy, and Nation. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
14.
BaumgartenBritta. 2014. “Culture and Activism across Borders.” Pp. 91–112 in Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research, edited by BaumgartenB.DaphiP.UllrichP.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
BaykanBarış Gençer. 2013. “Environmentalists in Turkey: Who Are They?” Perspectives4:8–11.
16.
BlackbournDavid. 2007. The Conquest of Nature: Water, Landscape, and the Making of Modern Germany. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
17.
BrulleRobert J.2000. “Environmental Discourse and Social Movement Organizations.” Pp. 217–37 in The Environment and Society Reader, edited by FreyScott R.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
ÇarkoğluAli. 2017. “Environmental Concerns in Turkey: A Comparative Perspective.” Pp.147–74 in Neoliberal Turkey and its Discontents, edited by F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, and M. Arsel. New York: I.B. Tauris.
19.
ÇaylıEray. 2018. “Conspiracy Theory as Spatial Practice: The Case of the Sivas Arson Attack, Turkey.”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36:255–72.
20.
ÇarkoğluAliKalaycıoğluErsin. 2010. Türkiye’de Çevre 2010 [Environment in Turkey 2010]. Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul Policy Center, Sabanci University.
21.
ÇobanAykut. 2004. “Community-based Ecological Resistance: The Bergama Movement in Turkey.” Environmental Politics13(2):438–60.
22.
CoyleCarmel. 1994. “Administrative Capacity and the Implementation of EU Environmental Policy in Ireland.” Pp. 62–79 in Protecting the Periphery: Environmental Policy in Peripheral Regions of the European Union, edited by BakerS.MiltonK.YearleyS.Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
23.
DianiMario. 1996. “Social Movements and Social Capital: A Network Perspective on Movement Outcomes.” Mobilization 2:129–47.
24.
DoğruBarışBağatırBulutPultarEren. 2018. “Türkiye’de İklim Değişikliği Algısı ve Enerji Tercihleri Araştırması” [Research on Perceptions on Climate Change and Energy Preferences in Turkey]. Turkey: Konda Research.
25.
DongwookKim. 2013. “International Nongovernmental Organization and the Global Diffusion of Human Rights Institutions.” International Organization67:505–39.
26.
DryzekJohn S.2013. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. 3rd ed.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27.
DryzekJohn S.DownesDavidHunoldChristianSchlosbergDavidHernesHans-Kristian. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28.
DuruBülent. 2013. “Sustainability of the Green Movement in Turkey.” Perspectives4:4–7.
ErensüSinan. 2016a. “Gezi, Ekoloji ve Karadeniz Rabıtasına Dair” [Searching for Gezi’s Inspiration in Black Sea]. Pp. 485–500 in Değișen Karadeniz’i Anlamak [Understanding Change in Black Sea Region], edited by YıldırımD.HaspolatE., Ankara, Turkey: Phoenix.
32.
ErensüSinan. 2016b. “Murgul’un Cengiz’i Yenen Fendi: Çevre-Emek Koalisyonunun Beklenmedik İmkanları” [An Unexpected Labor-environment Coalition: The Brief Uprising of Murgul]. Pp. 421–44 in Değișen Karadeniz’i Anlamak [Understanding Change in Black Sea Region], edited by YıldırımD.HaspolatE.Ankara, Turkey: Phoenix.
33.
FerreeMyraGamsonWilliam A.GerhardsJurgenRuchtDieter. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, England; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Eban Goodstein. 1999. The Trade-Off Myth: Fact And Fiction About Jobs And The Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35.
GültekinAhmet Kerim. 2016. “Kürt Dağlarından Bir Baraj Öyküsü: Pervari HES” [Story of a Dam Project from Kurdish Mountains: Pervari Hydroelectric Plant Project]. Pp. 223–47 in Sudan Sebepler Türkiye’de Neo-liberal Su-Enerji Politikaları ve Direnişler [Politics and Resistance to the Neo-liberal Water and Energy Policies in Turkey], edited by AksuC.ErensüS.EvrenE.Istanbul, Turkey: İletişim Yayınları.
36.
HamsiciMahmut. 2010. Dereler Ve İsyanlar [Rivers and Rebellion]. Ankara, Turkey: NotaBene.
IgnatowGabriel. 2005. “Economic Dependency and Environmental Attitudes in Turkey.” Environmental Politics14:648–66.
39.
İlhanAkgün. 2016. “Avrupa’dan Ortadoğu’ya Ilısu Projesine Karşı Haraket” [The Movement against Ilisu Dam Project from Europe to the Middle East]. Pp. 339–67 in Sudan Sebepler Türkiye’de Neo-liberal Su-Enerji Politikaları ve Direnişler [Politics and Resistance to the Neo-liberal Water and Energy Policies in Turkey], edited by AksuC.ErensüS.EvrenE.Istanbul, Turkey: İletişim Yayınları.
40.
IngelhartRonald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
JamisonAndrewEyermanRonCramerJacquelineLaessoeJeppe. 1990. The Making of the New Environmental Consciousness: A Comparative Study of the Environmental Movements in Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
42.
JohnstonHank. 2011. States and Social Movements. New York: Polity Press.
43.
JohnstonHankKlandermansBert. 1995. “The Cultural Analysis of Social Movements.” Pp. 3–24 in Social Movements and Culture, edited by JohnsonHankKlandermansBert. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
44.
KnudsenStåle. 2016. “Protests against Energy Projects in Turkey: Environmental Activism above Politics?” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies43:302–23.
45.
KoopmansRuudStathamPaul. 1999. “Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly4(2):203–21.
46.
LamontMicheleMolnarVirag. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
47.
LewisTammy L.2014. “Environmental Movements in the Global South.” Pp 300–14 in Twenty Lessons in Environmental Sociology. 2nd ed., edited by GouldKenneth A.LewisTammy L.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N.1973. The Trend of Social Movements in America. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
51.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N.1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology82:1212–41.
52.
MelucciAlberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movement and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Edited by KeaneJohnMierPaul. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
53.
MeyerDavid S.WhittierNancyRobnettBelinda, eds. 2002. Social Movements: Identity, Culture, and the State. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
ObachBrian K.2004. Labor and the Environmental Movement: The Quest for Common Ground. Cambridge: MIT Press.
55.
OffeClaus. 1985. “New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics.” Social Research52:817–68.
56.
OliverPamelaJohnstonHank. 2000. “What a Good Idea! Ideology and Frames in Social Movement Research.” Mobilization: An International Journal4:37–54.
57.
ÖzenHayriye. 2009. “Located Locally, Disseminated Nationally: The Bergama Movement.”Environmental Politics18(3):408–26.
58.
ÖzlerŞ. İlgü. 2000. “Politics of the Gecekondu in Turkey: The Political Choices of the Urban Squatters in National Elections.” Turkish Studies1:39–58.
59.
ÖzlerŞ. İlgüObachBrian. 2018. “Polarization and the Environmental Movement in Turkey.” Journal of Civil Society14:311–27.
60.
ÖzlerŞ. İlgüSarkissianAni. 2011. “Stalemate and Stagnation in Turkish Democratization: The Role of Civil Society and Political Parties.” Journal of Civil Society7:363–84.
61.
PakerHandeAdamanFikretKadirbeyoğluZeynepÖzkaynakBegüm. 2013. “Environmental Organizations in Turkey: Engaging the State and Finance Capital”. Environmental Politics22:760–78.
62.
ŞahinÜmit. 2013. “Gezi Direniși: Bir Demokrasi ve Ekoloji Mücadelesi” [Gezi Resistance: An Ecological and Democracy Struggle]. Üç Ekoloji10:9–22.
63.
SeckinelginHakan. 2016. “Social Policy and Conflict: The Gezi Park–Taksim Demonstrations and Uses of Social Policy for Reimagining Turkey.” Third World Quarterly37:264–80.
64.
ŞendenizÖzlem. 2016. “Doğu Karadeniz’de HES Mücadelesinin Dönüştürdükleri: Rize Fındıklı Örneği [The tranformational Hydroelectric Struggle in Eastern Blacksea: Rize Findikli Example].” Pp. 445–466 in Değişen Karadeniz’i Anlamak [Understanding Changing Blacksea Region], edited by YıldırımD.HaspolatE., Ankara: Phoenix.
65.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization.” Pp. 197–217 in From Structure to Action: Social Movement Participation across Cultures, edited by. KlandermansB.KriesiH.TarrowS.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
66.
SnowDavid A.RochfordE. BurkeWordenSteven K.Jr.BenfordRobert D.1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51:464–81.
67.
SnowDavid A.SouleSarah A.2010. A Primer on Social Movements. New York: W.W. Norton.
68.
SomerMurat. 2015. Milada Dönüş: Ulus-devletten Devlet-ulusa Türk Ve Kürt Meselesinin Üç İkilemi [Return to Point Zero: From Nation-state to State-nation, the Three Dilemmas of the Turkish and Kurdish Question]. Istanbul, Turkey: Koç University Press.
69.
TaylorVertaWhittierNancy E.1992. “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.” Pp. 104–29 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisA. D.MuellerC. M.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
70.
TillyCharles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71.
ToktamisKumru F.DavidIsabel. 2018. “Repression and Resistance—Fragments of Kurdish Politics in Turkey under the AKP Regime.” Turkish Studies19:661–70.
72.
ToveyHilarySharePerry. 2000. A Sociology of Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: Gill & Macmillan.
73.
TrueJacquiMintromMichael. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly45:27–57.
74.
UllrichPeterDaphiPriskaBaumgartenBritta. 2014. “Protest and Culture: Concepts and Approaches in Social Movement Research—An Introduction.” Pp. 1–20 in Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research, edited by BaumgartenB.DaphiP.UllrichP.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
75.
VoulvouliAlmilla. 2011. “Grassroots Mobilisation in Turkey: The Transnational Character of Local Environmental Protests.” International Journal of Academic Research3(1):881–88.
76.
WilliamsRhys. 1995. “Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources.” Social Problems42:24–44.
77.
World Values Survey, Wave 6 2010-2014 Official Aggregate v.20150418. World Values Survey Association. Retrieved July 17, 2019 (www.worldvaluessurvey.org).
78.
YearleySteven. 2005. Cultures of Environmentalism: Empirical Studies in Environmental Sociology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
