Societal cultures are grounded in characteristic and broadly shared meanings for particular identity labels, which encode social knowledge about the esteem, respect, and treatment that various types of people deserve. Although our cultural sentiments are predominantly shared with others, they also reflect our unique individual experiences. The present research examines the proposition that variegation in cultural affective meanings can be explained, in part, by sociodemographic characteristics, social position, and formative experiences in family and romantic relationships. Respondents from two universities of distinct racial and socioeconomic composition were found to have substantial consensus in their sentiments for social groups but to differ in these sentiments to a degree commonly found in cross-cultural comparisons. Where identity meanings diverge, race is an important predictor of differences in cultural sentiments, along with parents’ education and marital status, and disruption versus stability in parental and romantic attachments.
AmbrasatJensvon ScheveChristianSchauenburgGescheConradMarkusSchröderTobias. 2014. “Consensus and Stratification in the Affective Meaning of Human Sociality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America111:8001–06.
2.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Penguin.
3.
BlumerHerbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4.
BourdieuPierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241–58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by RichardsonJ.New York: Greenwood.
BrittLoryHeiseDavid R.2000. “From Shame to Pride in Identity Politics.” Pp. 252–68 in Self, Identity, and Social Movements, edited by StrykerS.OwensT. J.WhiteR. W.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
BurkePeter J.StetsJan E.2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
CeruloKaren A.2010. “Mining the Intersections of Cognitive Sociology and Neuroscience.” Poetics38:115–32.
9.
ChislettGailKennettDeborah J.2007. “The Effects of the Nobody’s Perfect Program on Parenting Resourcefulness and Competency.” Journal of Child and Family Studies16:473–82.
10.
DenzinNorman K.2008. Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies: The Politics of Interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11.
DiMaggioPaul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology23:263–87.
12.
DippongJosephKalkhoffWill. 2015. “Predicting Performance Expectations from Affective Impressions: Linking Affect Control Theory and Status Characteristics Theory.” Social Science Research50:1–14.
13.
FontaineJohnny R. J.SchererKlaus R.RoeschEtienne B.EllsworthPhoebe C.2007. “The World of Emotions is Not Two-dimensional.” Psychological Science18:1050–57.
14.
FoyStevenFreelandRobert E.MilesAndrewRogersKimberly B.Smith-LovinLynn. 2014. “Emotions and Affect as Source, Outcome and Resistance to Inequality.” Pp. 295–324 in Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by McLeodJ.LawlerE.SchwalbeM.New York: Springer.
15.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Overlook Press.
16.
GramsciAntonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
17.
HardingDavid R.2010. Living the Drama: Community, Conflict, and Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
18.
HeiseDavid R.1979. Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HeiseDavid R.1999. “Controlling Affective Experience Interpersonally.” Social Psychology Quarterly62:4–16.
KemperTheodore D.CollinsRandall. 1990. “Dimensions of Microinteraction.” American Journal of Sociology96:32–68.
27.
KroskaAmyHarknessSarah K.2006. “Stigma Sentiments and Self-meanings: Exploring the Modified Labeling Theory of Mental Illness.” Social Psychology Quarterly69:325–48.
28.
MacKinnonNeil J.HeiseDavid R.2010. Self, Identity, and Social Institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
30.
MeadGeorge H.1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
NeckermanKathryn M.TorcheFlorencia. 2007. “Inequality: Causes and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology33:335–57.
32.
OsgoodCharles E.MayWilliam H.MironMurray S.1975. Cross-cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
33.
OsgoodCharles E.SuciGeorge J.TannenbaumPercy H.1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
34.
OwensTimothy J.RobinsonDawn T.Smith-LovinLynn. 2010. “Three Faces of Identity.” Annual Review of Sociology36:477–99.
35.
RogersKimberly B.SchröderTobiasSchollWolfgang. 2013. “The Affective Structure of Stereotype Content: Behavior and Emotion in Intergroup Context.” Social Psychology Quarterly76:125–50.
36.
SchollWolfgang. 2013. “The Socio-Emotional Basis of Human Interaction and Communication. How We Construct Our Social World.” Social Science Information52:3–33.
37.
SchröderTobias. 2011. “A Model of Language-based Impression Formation and Attribution among Germans.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology30:82–102.
38.
SchröderTobiasHoeyJesseRogersKimberly B.2016. “Modeling Dynamic Identities and Uncertainty in Social Interactions: Bayesian Affect Control Theory.” American Sociological Review81:828–55.
39.
SchumanHowardSteehCharlotteBoboLawrence D.KrysanMaria. 1997. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
SewellAbigail A.HeiseDavid R.2010. “Racial Differences in Sentiments: Exploring Variant Cultures.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations34:400–12.
41.
SewellWilliam H.Jr.1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology98:1–29.
42.
SmithHerman W.MatsunoTakanoriUminoMichio. 1994. “How Similar are Impression-formation Processes among Japanese and Americans?” Social Psychology Quarterly57:124–39.
43.
Smith-LovinLynnDouglassWilliam. 1992. “An Affect Control Analysis of Two Religious Subcultures.” Pp. 217–48 in Social Perspectives on Emotions, edited by GecasV.FranksD.New York: JAI Press.
44.
StroblCarolinHothornTorstenZeileisAchim. 2009. “Party on! A New, Conditional Variable Importance Measure for Random Forests Available in Party Package.” The R Journal1(2):14–17.
45.
StroblCarolinMalleyJamesTutzGerhard. 2009. “An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rational, Application, and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests.” Psychological Methods14:323–48.
46.
StrykerSheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
47.
StrykerSheldon. 2008. “From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and beyond.” Annual Review of Sociology34:15–31.
48.
SwidlerAnn. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review51:273–86.
49.
ThomasLisaHeiseDavid R.1995. “Mining Error Variance and Hitting Pay-dirt: Discovering Systematic Variation in Social Sentiments.” Sociological Quarterly36:425–39.
50.
ThomassenLisa. 2002. “An Alcoholic Is Good and Sober: Sentiment Change in AA.” Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal23:177–200.
51.
WeiMeifenRussellDaniel W.MallinckrodtBrentVogelDavid L.2007. “The Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR)-Short Form: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure.” Journal of Personality Assessment88:187–204.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
