We investigate between- and within-country consensus about affective meanings of social identities along the evaluation, potency, and activity dimensions from the affect control theory research tradition. Ratings for 387 (194 male and 193 female) identities were collected from two samples representative of the French (N = 700) and German (N = 700) populations for age, gender, and region. Guided by two preregistered hypotheses based on previous cross-cultural research, our analysis points to considerable cultural consensus between French and Germans who seem to share a common “Carolingian” affective culture; yet some culture-specific patterns concerning the evaluation dimension and evaluation-potency interactions were found to be statistically significant. We interpret these results in terms of known cross-cultural features such as power distance and conceptions of power.
AkaliyskiPlamen. 2019. “United in Diversity? The Convergence of Cultural Values among EU Member States and Candidates.”European Journal of Political Research58(2):388–411. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12285.
2.
AmbrasatJensVon ScheveChristianConradMarkusGescheSchauenburgSchröderTobias. 2014. “Consensus and Stratification in the Affective Meaning of Human Sociality.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America111(22):8001–8006. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313321111.
3.
BergerJoseph H.FamitFisekNormanRobert Z.MorrisZelditchJr.1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
4.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas[1966]1991. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.
5.
BoxellLeviGentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2022. “Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization.”Review of Economics and Statistics. doi:10.1162/rest_a_01160.
CostelloAnna M.OsborneJason A.2005. “Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis.”Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation10(1):7. doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868.
8.
CuddyAmy J.C.FiskeSusan T.PeterGlick. 2008. “Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map.”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology40:61–149. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(07)00002-0.
9.
DeVellisRobert F.ThorpeCarolyn T.2021. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
DevinePatricia G.2001. “Implicit Prejudice and Stereotyping: How Automatic Are They? Introduction to the Special Section.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(5):757–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.757.
11.
DiMaggioPaul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.”Annual Review of Sociology23(1):263–87. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263.
12.
DuncanSethFeldman BarrettLisa. 2007. “Affect Is a Form of Cognition: A Neurobiological Analysis.”Cognition and Emotion21(6):1184–211. doi:10.1080/02699930701437931.
13.
HeiseDavid R.1979. Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
HeiseDavid R.2007. Expressive Order: Confirming Sentiments in Social Actions. Boston, MA: Springer.
16.
HeiseDavid R.2010. Surveying Cultures: Discovering Shared Conceptions and Sentiments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
HeiseDavid R.2019. Cultural Meanings and Social Institutions: Social Organization Through Language. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
18.
HeiseDavid R.MacKinnonNeil J.WolfgangScholl. 2015. “Identities, Roles, and Social Institutions.” Pp. 165–88 in Order on the Edge of Chaos, edited by LawlerE. J.ThyeS. R.YoonJ.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HofstedeGeert. 1984. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
HofstedeGeertHofstedeGert J.MinkowMichael. 1997. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
HuntPamela M.2012. “Examining the Affective Meanings of Interaction Settings in the Jamband Music Subculture.”The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology4(1):5. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jpps/vol4/iss1/5.
23.
InglehartRonaldBakerWayne E.2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.”American Sociological Review65(1):19–51. doi:10.2307/2657288.
24.
JohnsonTimothyKulesaPatrickYoung IkChoShavittSharon. 2005. “The Relation between Culture and Response Styles: Evidence from 19 Countries.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology36(2):264–77. doi:10.1177/0022022104272905.
25.
KyriazosTheodoros A.2018. “Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General.”Psychology9(8):2207–30. doi:10.4236/psych.2018.98126.
26.
MacKinnonNeil J.HeiseDavid R.2010. Self, Identity, and Social Institutions. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230108493.
27.
MacKinnonNeil J.LeoKeating. 1989. “The Structure of Emotions: Canada-United States Comparisons.”Social Psychology Quarterly52(1):70–83. doi:10.2307/2786905.
28.
MacKinnonNeil J.AlisonLuke. 2002. “Changes in Identity Attitudes as Reflections of Social and Cultural Change.”Canadian Journal of Sociology27:299–338. doi:10.2307/3341547.
29.
MadvaAlexBrownsteinMichael J.2018. “Stereotypes, Prejudice, and the Taxonomy of the Implicit Social Mind.”Noûs52(3):611–44. doi:10.1111/nous.12182.
30.
MehrabianAlbertRussellJames A.1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
31.
MinkovMichaelHofstedeGeert2012“Is National Culture a Meaningful Concept?”Cross-Cultural Research46(2):133–59. doi:10.1177/1069397111427262.
32.
MinkovMichaelHofstedeGeert. 2014. “Clustering of 316 European Regions on Measures of Values.”Cross-Cultural Research48(2):144–76. doi:10.1177/1069397113510866.
33.
MondillonLaurieNiedenthalPaula M.BrauerMichaelRohmannAnetteDalleNathalieUchidaYukiko. 2005. “Beliefs about Power and Its Relation to Emotional Experience: A Comparison of Japan, France, Germany, and the United States.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(8):1112–22. doi:10.1177/0146167205274900.
34.
OsgoodCharles E.MayWilliam H.MurraySamuel MironMironMurray S.1975. Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35.
OsgoodCharles E.SuciGeorge J.TannenbaumPercy H.1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
36.
PastoreMassimilianoCalcagnìAntonio. 2019. “Measuring Distribution Similarities between Samples: A Distribution-Free Overlapping Index.”Frontiers in Psychology10:1089. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01089.
37.
PetersonRobert A.PabloRhi-PerezGeraldAlbaum G.2014. “A Cross-National Comparison of Extreme Response Style Measures.”International Journal of Market Research56(1):89–110. doi:10.2501/IJMR-2014-005.
38.
QuinnJoseph F.FreelandRobert S.RogersKimberly B.HoeyJesseLynnSmith-Lovin. 2023. “How Cultural Meanings of Occupations in the U.S. Changed during the Covid-19 Pandemic.”American Behavioral Scientist67(1):125–47. doi:10.1177/00027642211066041.
39.
RidgewayCecilia L.2019. Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter?New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
RogersKimberly B.2019. “Sources of Consensus and Variegation in Cultural Affective Meanings.”Social Currents6(3):219–38. doi:10.1177/2329496518805688.
41.
KimballRomney A.WellerSusan C.BatchelderWilliam H.1986. “Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy.”American Anthropologist88(2):313–38. doi:10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00020.
42.
SchauenburgGescheAmbrasatJensTobiasSchröderChristianVon ScheveConradMarkus. 2015. “Emotional Connotations of Words Related to Authority and Community.”Behavior Research Methods47:720–35. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0494-7.
43.
SchneiderAndreas. 1989. “Mean Affective Ratings of 804 Concepts by West German Students in 1989.”University of Georgia. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.
44.
SchneiderAndreas S.1996. “Sexual-Erotic Emotions in the U.S. in Cross-Cultural Comparison.”International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy16(9/10):123–43. doi:10.1108/eb013272.
SchneiderAndreas S.1999b. “US Neo-conservatism: Cohort and Cross-Cultural Perspective.”International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy19(12):56–86. doi:10.1108/01443339910788631.
47.
SchneiderAndreas S.2004. “The Ideal Type of Authority in the United States and Germany.”Sociological Perspectives47(3):313–27. doi:10.1525/sop.2004.47.3.313.
48.
SchröderTobias. 2011. “A Model of Language-Based Impression Formation and Attribution among Germans.”Journal of Language and Social Psychology30(1):82–102. doi:10.1177/0261927x10387103.
49.
SchröderTobiasRogersKimberly B.IkeShuichirouMellJulijaSchollWolfgang. 2013. “Affective Meanings of Stereotyped Social Groups in Cross-Cultural Comparison.”Group Processes & Intergroup Relations16(6):717–33. doi:10.1177/1368430213491788.
50.
SewellAbigail A.HeiseDavid R.2010. “Racial Differences in Sentiments: Exploring Variant Cultures.”International Journal of Intercultural Relations34(4):400–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.03.001.
51.
ShahidShaukat S.Ahmed RaoToqeerRafiq KhanMoazzam. 2016. “Impact of Sample Size on Principal Component Analysis Ordination of an Environmental Data Set: Effects on Eigenstructure.”Ekologia35(2):173–90. doi:10.1515/eko-2016-0014.
52.
SiedlerThomas. 2010. “Schooling and Citizenship in a Young Democracy: Evidence from Postwar Germany.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics112(2):315–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01604.x.
53.
SkrandiesWolfgang. 2011. “The Structure of Semantic Meaning: A Developmental Study.”Japanese Psychological Research53(1):65–76. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2010.00456.x.
54.
SmithHerman W.MichioUminoTakanoriMatsuno. 1998. “The Formation of Gender-Differentiated Sentiments in Japan.”Journal of Mathematical Sociology22(4):373–95. doi:10.1080/0022250x.1998.9990209.
55.
Smith-LovinLynn. 1987. “The Affective Control of Events within Settings.”Journal of Mathematical Sociology13(1–2):71–101. doi:10.1080/0022250x.1987.9990027.
56.
Smith-LovinLynnDouglassWilliam. 1992. “An Affect Control Analysis of Two Religious Subcultures.”Pp. 217–47 in Social Perspectives on Emotion, edited byFranksD.GecasV.New York, NY: JAI Press.
57.
Smith-LovinLynnRobinsonDawn T.CannonBryan C.ClarkJesse K.FreelandRobertMorganJonathan H.RogersKimberly B.2016. “Mean Affective Ratings of 929 Identities, 814 Behaviors, and 660 Modifiers by University of Georgia and Duke University Undergraduates and by Community Members in Durham, NC, in 2012-2014.”University of Georgia. http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act/.
58.
StetsJan E.PeterBurke. 2000. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.”Social Psychology Quarterly63(3):224–37. doi:10.2307/2695870.
59.
ThomasLisa S.HeiseDavid R.1995. “Mining Error Variance and Hitting Pay-Dirt: Discovering Systematic Variation in Social Sentiments.”Sociological Quarterly36(2):425–39. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00446.x.
60.
TibshiraniRobertWaltherGuentherHastieTrevor. 2001. “Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set via the Gap Statistic.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology63(2):411–23. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293.
61.
van HerkHesterPoortingaYpe H.VerhallenTheo M. M.2004. “Response Styles in Rating Scales: Evidence of Method Bias in Data from Six EU Countries.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology35(3):346–60. doi:10.1177/0022022104264126.
62.
van HouwelingenPepijnIedemaJurjenDekkerPaul. 2019. “Convergence on Political Values? A Multi-level Analysis of Developments in 15 EU Countries 2002-2016.”Journal of European Integration41(5):587–604. doi:10.1080/07036337.2018.1537270.
63.
van VlimmerenEvaMoorsGuyGelissenJohn. 2017. “Clusters of Cultures: Diversity in Meaning of Family Value and Gender Role Items across Europe.”Quality & Quantity51(6):2737–60. doi:10.1007/s11135-016-0422-2.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
