Since the late 1970s, the profession of human resource management has grown in both size and influence. The number of human resource managers in 2010 is almost twice the number that existed in 1980. Furthermore, this profession has become increasingly feminized since the 1970s—today, around 60 percent of human resource managers are women. While previous research has found that women’s presence in certain occupations can improve gender equity, there has yet to be an examination of whether the increased representation of women in human resource management has affected gender equity more broadly. In this article, I analyze data from the U.S. Census from 1980 to 2000 and from the American Community Survey for 2010 to explore whether the rise and feminization of human resources has affected women’s representation in management. The findings reveal that the increased presence of both white and black women in human resources has been accompanied by greater representation of women in management, although the effects are much larger for white women’s presence in human resources.
AckerJoan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.”Gender & Society4(2):139–58.
2.
AckerJoan. 2006. “Inequality Regimes Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations.”Gender & Society20(4):441–64.
3.
AldridgeDelores. 1999. “Black Women and the New World Order: Toward a Fit in the Economic Marketplace.” Pp. 357–79 in Latinas and African American Women at Work: Race, Gender and Economic Inequality, edited by BrowneIrene. New York: Russell Sage.
4.
AllisonPaul D.2005. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Press.
5.
BielbyWilliam T.BaronJames N.1986. “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.”American Journal of Sociology91(4):759–99.
6.
BrowneIreneHewittCynthiaTiggesLeannGreenGary. 2001. “Why Does Job Segregation Lead to Wage Inequality among African Americans? Person, Place, Sector, or Skills?”Social Science Research30(3):472–95.
7.
BrowneIreneMisraJoya. 2003. “The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market.”Annual Review of Sociology29:487–513.
8.
ChandlerAlfred D.Jr.1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
9.
CharlesMaria. 2011. “A World of Difference: International Trends in Women’s Economic Status.”Annual Review of Sociology37:355–71.
10.
CharlesMariaGruskyDavid B.2004. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
CohenPhilip N.HuffmanMatt L.2007. “Working for the Woman? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap.”American Sociological Review72(5):681–704.
12.
CookAlisonGlassChristy. 2014. “The Power of One or Power in Numbers? Analyzing the Effect of Minority Leaders on Organizational Policy and Practice.”Work and Occupations42:183–215.
13.
CookAlisonGlassChristy. 2015. “Diversity Begets Diversity? The Effects of Board Composition on the Promotion and Success of Women CEOs.”Social Science Research53:137–47.
14.
CotterDavid A.HermsenJoan M.VannemanReeve. 2004. “Gender Inequality at Work.” Pp. 107–37 in The American People: Census 2000, edited by FarleyReynoldsHaagaJohn. New York: Russell Sage.
15.
DobbinFrank. 2009. Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
DwyerRachel E.2013. “The Care Economy? Gender, Economic Restructuring, and Job Polarization in the U.S. Labor Market.”American Sociological Review78:390–416.
17.
EdelmanLauren B.2002. “Legality and the Endogeneity of Law.” Pp. 187–202 in Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick, edited by SelznickPhilipKaganRobert A.KrygierMartinWinstonKenneth I.New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
EdelmanLauren B.KriegerLinda H.EliasonScott R.AlibstonCatherine R.MellemaVirginia. 2011. “When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures.”American Journal of Sociology17(3):888–954.
19.
EdelmanLauren B.UggenChristopherErlangerHoward S.1999. “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth.”American Journal of Sociology105(2):406–54.
20.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.”Gender & Society24(2):149–66.
21.
HegewischArianeWilliamsClaudiaHendersonAmber. 2011. The Gender Wage Gap: 2010. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
KaiserCherylMajorBrendaJurcevicInesDoverTessa L.BradyLaura M.ShapiroJenessa R.2013. “Presumed Fair: Ironic Effects of Organizational Diversity Structures.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology104(3):504–19.
24.
KalevAlexandraKellyErinDobbinFrank. 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Diversity Policies.”American Sociological Review71(4):589–617.
25.
KanterRosabeth. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
26.
LipskyMichael. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.
27.
MeierKenneth J.BohteJohn. 2001. “Structure and Discretion: Missing Links in Representative Bureaucracy.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11(4):455–70.
28.
MicklethwaitJohnWoolridgeAdrian. 2003. The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea. New York: Modern Library.
29.
RugglesStevenGenadekKatieGoekenRonaldGroverJosiahSobekMatthew. 2015. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 6.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
30.
ScottPatrick G.1997. “Assessing Determinants of Bureaucratic Discretion: An Experiment in Street-level Decision Making.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory7:35–57.
31.
SkaggsSherylStainbackKevinDuncanPhyllis. 2012. “Shaking Things Up or Business as Usual? The Influence of Female Corporate Executives and Board of Directors on Women’s Managerial Representation.”Social Science Research41:936–48.
32.
StainbackKevinKleinerSibylSkaggsSheryl. 2015. “Women in Power: Undoing or Redoing the Gendered Organization?”Gender & Society30:1–27.
33.
StainbackKevinKwonSoyoung. 2012. “Female Leaders, Organizational Power, and Sex Segregation.”The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science639:217–35.
34.
StainbackKevinTomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 2009. “Intersections of Power and Privilege: Long-term Trends in Managerial Representation.”American Sociological Review74(5):800–20.
35.
StainbackKevinTomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 2012. Documenting Desegregation: Racial and Gender Segregation in Private-sector Employment since the Civil Rights Act. New York: Russell Sage.
36.
TillyCharles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldStainbackKevin. 2007. “Discrimination and Desegregation: Equal Opportunity Progress in U.S. Private Sector Workplaces since the Civil Rights Act.”The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science609:49–84.
38.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014. BLS Reports: Women in the Labor Force: A Databook. Washington, DC. Retrieved October6, 2015 (http://www.bls.gov/opub/).
39.
Watkins-HayesCeleste. 2011. “Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21:233–51.
40.
WilliamsChristine L.1992. “The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the ‘Female’ Professions.”Social Problems39(3):253–67.
41.
WingfieldAdia H.2009. “Racializing the Glass Escalator: Reconsidering Men’s Experiences with Women’s Work.”Gender & Society23(1):5–26.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
