This study explores how truth-default theory (TDT) and relevance theory apply to public speaking and business communication. Two hundred eight college students watched one of four speech introductions varying by topic relevance and the presence of an explicit credibility statement. Participants rated speaker trustworthiness and credibility. Results showed that topic relevance had a greater influence on audience perceptions than explicit credibility statements. Highly relevant topics reduced suspicion and supported TDT’s claim that deception detection requires a trigger. These findings illustrate how speakers can build credibility and how audiences evaluate messages in educational and business public speaking contexts.
BurgoonJ. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1–2), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x93121003
2.
CalabreseR. (1989). Designing and delivering presentations and workshops. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 52(2), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056998905200210
3.
ClementsonD. E.PageT. G. (2021). (In)sincere demeanor and (in)sincere language in crisis communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(5), 500–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x211045724
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1967). Head and body cues in the judgment of emotion: A reformulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24(3), 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/003151256702400305
7.
EkmanP.O’SullivanM.FriesenW. V.SchererK. R. (1991). Invited article: Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00998267
8.
FanX.GriffinD. J.TaggE. P. (2022). Lie judgment trigger sensitivity and truth-bias: Truth default theory in intergroup communication. Communication Quarterly, 70(4), 448–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2079994
9.
HurleyC. M.GriffinD. J.StefanoneM. A. (2014). Who told you that? Uncovering the source of believed cues to deception. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 6(1), 19.
10.
GambleT. K.GambleM. (2021). The public speaking playbook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
11.
GermanK. M. (2020). Principles of public speaking (20th ed.). Routledge.
12.
KromkaS. M. (2020). The effects of instructor self-disclosure on students’ cognitive learning: A live lecture experiment (Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7642). https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7642
LevineT. R. (2020). Duped: Truth-default theory and the social science of lying and deception. University of Alabama Press.
15.
LevineT. R. (2022). Truth-default theory and the psychology of lying and deception detection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101380
16.
LevineT. R.BlairJ. P.ClareD. D. (2013). Diagnostic utility: Experimental demonstrations and replications of powerful question effects in high-relevance deception detection. Human Communication Research, 40(2), 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12021
LevineT. R.KnappM. L. (2018). Lying and deception in close relationships. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 329–340. Cambridge University Press.
19.
LucasS.StobP. (2020). The art of public speaking (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (1996). Fundamentals of human communication: An interpersonal perspective. Waveland Press Inc.
22.
McCroskeyJ. C.TevenJ. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
23.
McCroskeyJ. C.YoungT. J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978109368075
24.
MikkelsonA.TietsortC.HinnenkampC. (2024). Employee perceptions of supervisor credibility: Predictive effects for employee well-being outcomes. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241241668
25.
ParkH. S.LevineT.McCornackS.MorrisonK.FerraraM. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/714041710
26.
RossW. D. (1924). Aristotle’s metaphysics (Vol. 1). The Clarendon Press.
27.
SánchezN.MasipJ.HerreroC. (2021). How people [try to] detect lies in everyday life. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 25(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2021.4.02
SelfC. C.RobertsC. (2019). Credibility. In StacksD. W.SalwenM. B.EichhornK. C. (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 435–446). Routledge. https://doi-org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/10.4324/9780203710753
WheelessL. R. (1973). Effects of explicit credibility statements by more credible and less credible sources. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 39(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417947309372214
32.
WilsonD.SperberD. (2006). Chapter 27: Relevance theory. In HornL. R. (Ed.), The Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Blackwell.
