This conceptual article develops a model of positive LinkedIn communication, arguing that responsive, affirming, and authentic interaction—organized into two higher-order behavioral dimensions—strengthens perceived support and trust, thereby shaping professional outcomes (e.g., recruitment, collaboration, and commercial opportunities). By shifting attention from static profile signals to communicative behaviors enacted in posts, comments, and messages, the framework advances testable propositions and specifies mechanisms, boundary conditions, and potential trade-offs that invite empirical evaluation across organizational and cultural contexts.
AlamM. M.StubbsF. K.Nousek McGregorA. E.SherryL. (2023). LinkedIn to get in: Embedding learning activities to support student career development through online professional networking. Higher Education Pedagogies, 8(1), 27–45.
2.
AndrésJ. C.AguadoD.García IzquierdoA. L. (2023). Big Four LinkedIn dimensions: Signals of soft skills?Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 39(2), 75–88.
3.
CardonP. W.ChristieC. J.WongJ. (2021). Preferences for written and spoken expressions of thanks among American professionals. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84(1), 31–59.
4.
CelaniA.SinghP. (2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40(2), 222–238.
5.
Cheikh AmmarM.JabagiN. (2025). LinkedIn’s dilemma: Navigating stress and well being on professional networking platforms. Internet Research, 35(7), 71–90.
6.
ChengI. H.LeeS. T. (2023). Timeliness, responsiveness and the human voice: The effects of dialogic strategies and the mediating role of perceived communication ethicality on social media relationship building. Public Relations Review, 49(4), 102355.
7.
DavisJ.WolffH. G.ForretM. L.SullivanS. E. (2020). Networking via LinkedIn: An examination of usage and career benefits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103396.
8.
DerksD.FischerA. H.BosA. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785.
9.
EskelinenK.KotilaJ. (2019). Co creation vs. brandjacking: A case study on customer engagement on LinkedIn [Master’s thesis]. University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
10.
FernandezS.StöcklinM.TerrierL.KimS. (2021). Using available signals on LinkedIn for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104122.
11.
GandiniA. (2015). Digital work: Self branding and social capital in the freelance knowledge economy. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 123–141.
12.
GefenD.StraubD. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e products and e services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424.
13.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
14.
HanR. (2023). More talk, more support? The effects of social network interaction and social network evaluation on social support via social media. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 3857–3866.
15.
HosainM. S.MamunA. M. A. (2023). The roles of LinkedIn based skill endorsements and LinkedIn based hiring recommendations on hiring preferences: Evidence from Bangladeshi employers. Management Matters, 20(2), 169–184.
16.
HwangS. Y.KhojastehN.FussellS. R. (2019). When delayed in a hurry: Interpretations of response delays in time sensitive instant messaging. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction, 3, Article 234.
17.
ItzchakovG.ReisH. T. (2023). Listening and perceived responsiveness: Unveiling the significance and exploring crucial research endeavors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, 101662.
18.
JohnstonK. A.LaneA. B. (2019). An authenticity matrix for community engagement. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101811.
19.
KotcharinS.DeheB.BoonchooP. (2024). All you need is trust: Examining trust, information sharing, and supplier performance perception in SMEs from a social exchange perspective. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2415523.
20.
LabrecqueL. I.MarkosE.MilneG. R. (2011). Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1), 37–50.
21.
LaiC. H.FuJ. S. (2020). Organizations’ dialogic social media use and stakeholder engagement: Stakeholder targeting and message framing. International Journal of Communication, 14, Article 26.
22.
LinN. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19). Cambridge University Press.
23.
López CarrilS.AnagnostopoulosC.ParganasP. (2020). Social media in sport management education: Introducing LinkedIn. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, 100262.
24.
MarinG. D.NilăC. (2021). Branding in social media: Using LinkedIn in personal brand communication, a study on communications/marketing and recruitment/human resources specialists’ perception. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100174.
25.
MickelA. E. (2024). Positive communication practices for enhancing collaboration. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(4), 876–902.
26.
MirivelJ. C.FullerR. P. (2024). A world of possibilities: Introducing positive communication scholarship to inspire better business and organizational communication research. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(4), 743–759.
27.
MönkeF. W.BürgerA. S.SteinbrecherJ.BornemannM.WedelstedtN.SchinkelS. (2025). When less is not more: Incomplete information in LinkedIn assessments and the moderating role of applicants’ résumé. Journal of Business and Psychology, 40, 1465–1491.
28.
Mora CortezR.JohnstonW. J.Ghosh DastidarA. (2023). Managing the content of LinkedIn posts: Influence on B2B customer engagement and sales?Journal of Business Research, 155, 113388.
29.
PeñaL.CuradoC.OliveiraM. (2022). The contribution of LinkedIn use to career outcome expectations. Journal of Business Research, 144, 788–796.
30.
PhanT. A. (2024). AI integration for communication skills: A conceptual framework in education and business. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241302000
31.
PhanT. A. (2025a). Business communication research: Trends and themes from dual bibliometric analysis. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906251358384
32.
PhanT. A. (2025b). The role of positive communication in enhancing educational outcomes. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906251345789
33.
PhanT. A.TranH. P.NinhT. T.NguyenH. K. (2025). “Hey AI, should I buy this stock?”–Trust, technology, and the rise of the young investor. Strategic Business Research, 1(1), 100014.
34.
Puncheva MichelottiP.HudsonS.JinG. (2018). Employer branding and CSR communication in online recruitment advertising. Business Horizons, 61(4), 643–651.
35.
RothP. L.BobkoP.Van IddekingeC. H.ThatcherJ. B. (2013). Social media in employee selection related decisions: A research agenda for uncharted territory. Journal of Management, 42(1), 269–298.
36.
RoulinN.LevashinaJ. (2018). LinkedIn as a new selection method: Psychometric properties and assessment approach. Personnel Psychology, 72(2), 187–211.
37.
RuiJ. R. (2018). Objective evaluation or collective self presentation? What people expect of LinkedIn recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 121–128.
38.
RuparelN.DhirA.TandonA.KaurP.IslamJ. U. (2020). The influence of online professional social media in human resource management: A systematic literature review. Technology in Society, 63, 101335.
39.
ShepherdI. D. H. (2005). From cattle and Coke to Charlie: Meeting the challenge of self marketing and personal branding. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(5–6), 589–606.
40.
SpenceM. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
41.
StewartK. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–17.
42.
TranH. P. (2025). Rethinking teacher-student communication in the AI era. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 575–590.
43.
UseraD.DurhamN. (2025). What predicts engagement on LinkedIn? Engagement-boosting strategies for professionals. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906251336710.
44.
UtzS. (2015). Is LinkedIn making you more successful? The informational benefits derived from public social media. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2685–2702.
45.
van de VenN.BogaertA.SerlieA.BrandtM. J.DenissenJ. J. (2017). Personality perception based on LinkedIn profiles. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(6), 418–429.
46.
van DijckJ. (2013). You have one identity: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 199–215.
47.
WaltherJ. B. (2016). Social information processing theory (CMC). In BergerC. R.RoloffM. E. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–13). Wiley.
48.
WaltherJ. B.Van Der HeideB.HamelL. M.ShulmanH. C. (2009). Self generated versus other generated statements and impressions in computer mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36(2), 229–253.
49.
WangX.RegerR. K.PfarrerM. D. (2021). Faster, hotter, and more LinkedIn: Managing social disapproval in the social media era. Academy of Management Review, 46(2), 207–229.
50.
ZideJ.ElmanB.Shahani DenningC. (2014). LinkedIn and recruitment: How profiles differ across occupations. Employee Relations, 36(5), 583–604.
