We conducted 10 focus groups with 32 academic consultants to identify three intrinsic rewards categories for academic consulting: meaningful work, professional development, and enhanced teaching. Based on these findings, we propose a typology of academic consulting, teaching-driven consulting, and a multifaceted framework of academic consultant career identity. Our framework provides rhetorical resources for faculty, staff, and administrators to discuss academic consulting identities, tie aspects of identity to preferred rewards categories, and advocate for consulting resources and support.
Ali AbadiH.CoetzerA.RoxasH. ‘Banjo’PishdarM. (2022). Informal learning and career identity formation: The mediating role of work engagement. Personnel Review, 52(1), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2021-0121
2.
BaldwinR. G. (1979). Adult and career development: What are the implications for faculty?Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 13-20.
3.
BarrettL.Helens-HartR. (2022). The value of a liberal arts degree: Students’ perspectives on financial and nonfinancial returns on investment. Western Journal of Communication, 86(5), 672-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2022.2100469
ChillaraL. H.SahooD.PonnamA. (2017). Determinants and outcomes of faculty consulting from management teachers’ perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(2), 211-225.
6.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
7.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The support of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. Human Resource Management Review, 10(2), 293-323.
8.
DochertyI.SmithD. (2007). Practicing what we preach? Academic consultancy in a multi-disciplinary environment. Public Money and Management, 27(4), 273-280.
9.
EngstromC.Helens-HartR. (2023). In-demand instructional communication competencies for organizational trainers. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221149408
10.
FugateM.KinickiA. J.AshforthB. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
11.
GiesenL.RoeserA. (2020). Structuring a team-based approach to coding qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920968700
12.
HagedornL. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(105), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.10501
13.
Helens-HartR.EngstromC. (2020). Empathy as an essential skill for talent development consultants. Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(4), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-06-2020-0098
14.
HughesT.BenceD.GrisoniL.O’reganN.WornhamD. (2011). Scholarship that matters: Academic-practitioner engagement in business and management. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(1), 40-57.
15.
LandryA. T.WhillansA. (2019). The power of workplace rewards: Using self-determination theory to understand why reward satisfaction matters for workers around the world. Compensation and Benefits Review, 50(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/088636871984051
16.
PerkmannM.WalshK. (2008). Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy, 37(10), 1884-1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009
17.
PiferM. J.BakerV. L. (2016). Professional, personal, and relational: Exploring the salience of identity in academic careers. Identity, 16(3), 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2016.1190729
18.
QuittmeyerC. L. (1960). Faculty consulting practices. The Journal of the Academy of Management, 3(1), 41-50.
SpinradM. L.RellesS. R.WatsonD. L. (2022). Not in the greater good: Academic capitalism and faculty labor in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(12), 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120912
