Meetings are an essential part of organizational life everywhere. Although research has shown that meeting styles differ among cultures, studies focusing on a broad set of data to compare the prevalent meeting styles systematically are rare, partly because of the high academic standards required by researchers. There is, however, much informal data on meeting styles aimed at practitioners, which despite its shortcomings, can be useful. The information provided is largely based on the experiences made by internationally active businesspeople. Under the author’s supervision, students of the author’s business school analyzed a great number of descriptions of meeting practices to investigate in what respects meetings differ. The results were combined with earlier research and general situational context models to come to a meeting-specific model that enables a systematic comparison of meeting practices. This model can be applied for educational as well as for practical purposes.
AartsH.DijksterhuisA. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 18-28.
2.
BrownP.FraserC. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In SchererK. R.GilesH. (Eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 33-62). Cambridge University Press.
3.
Cardel GertsenM.ZølnerM. (2020). Interpretive approaches to culture: What is interpretive cross-cultural management research? In SzkudlarekB.RomaniL.CaprarD.OslandJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of contemporary cross-cultural management (pp. 34-50). Sage.
4.
ChhokarJ. S.BrodbeckF. C.HouseR. J. (Eds.), (2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Erlbaum.
5.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026.
6.
CookP.EllisC.GrafM.ReinG.SmithT. (1987). Project Nick: Meetings augmentation and analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 5(2), 132-146.
de JongsteH. (2020). Playing with mental models: Humour in the BBC comedy series the office. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9.
GelfandM. J.LunJ. (2013). The culture of the situation: The role of situational strength in cultural systems. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(1), 34-38.
10.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ.AycanZ.BoehnkeK.BoskiP.CabecinhasR.ChanD.ChhokarJ.D’AmatoA.FerrerM.FischlmayrI. C.. . . YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100-1104.
HallE. T. (1959). The silent language: An anthropologist reveals how we communicate by our manners and behavior. Doubleday.
13.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
14.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. McGraw-Hill.
15.
HymesD. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
KeshlafA. A.AlahreshA. A.AswadM. K. (2021, May25-27). Factors influencing the use of on-line meeting tools [Conference session]. IEEE 1st International Maghreb Meeting of the Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering MI-STA, Tripoli, Libya (pp. 908-912). IEEE.
KöhlerT.GölzM. (2015). Meetings across cultures: Cultural differences in meeting expectations and processes. In AllenJ. A.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.RogelbergS. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 119-150). Cambridge University Press.
19.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
20.
LefringhausenK.Spencer-OateyH.DebrayC. (2019). Culture, norms, and the assessment of communication contexts: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(10), 1098-1111.
21.
Lehmann-WillenbrockN.AllenJ. A.BelyeuD. (2016). Our love/hate relationship with meetings. Management Research Review, 39(10), 1293-1312.
22.
Lehmann-WillenbrockN.AllenJ. A.MeineckeA. L. (2014). Observing culture: Differences in U.S.-American and German team meeting behaviors. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(2), 252-271.
23.
Lehmann-WillenbrockN.MeineckeA. L. (2018). Team-meeting behaviors in Germany and the United States. In KimY. Y. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (pp. 1-6). Wiley Blackwell.
24.
MatsumotoD. (2007). Culture, context, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 75(6), 1285-1320.
25.
MrozJ. E.AllenJ. A.VerhoevenD. C.ShufflerM. L. (2018). Do we really need another meeting? The science of workplace meetings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 484-491.
26.
MuhrS. L.LemmergaardJ. (2011). On the road again: Culturally generic spaces as coping strategies in international consultancy. In PrimeczH.RomaniL.SackmannS. (Eds.), Cross-cultural management in practice: Culture and negotiated meanings (pp. 18-28). Elgar.
27.
NishidaH. (2005). Cultural schema theory. In GudykunstW. B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 401-418). Sage.
28.
SagiS. (2015). “Nemawashi” a technique to gain consensus in Japanese Management Systems: An overview. International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Management Studies, 1(4), 23-28.
29.
SchwartzmanH. B. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. Plenum.
30.
ScollonR.ScollonS. B. K. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Blackwell.
31.
Spencer-OateyH. (2000). Introduction. In Spencer-OateyH. (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 1-10). Continuum.
32.
Spencer-OateyH. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Spencer-OateyH. (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (pp. 11-47). Continuum.
33.
Spencer-OateyH.XingJ. (2019). Interdisciplinary perspectives on interpersonal relations and the evaluation process: Culture, norms, and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 141-154.
34.
SprainL.Boromisza-HabashiD. (2012). Meetings: A cultural perspective. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 7(2), 179-189.
35.
StiversT.EnfieldN. J.BrownP.EnglertC.HayashiM.HeinemannT.HoymannG.RossanoF.de RuiterJ. P.YoonK.-E.LevinsonS. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10587-10592.
SwanM.SmithB. (Eds.), (2001). Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. Cambridge University Press.
38.
TomaselloM. (2014). The ultra-social animal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 187-194.
39.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.
40.
TrompenaarsA. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. Economist Books.
41.
TrompenaarsF.Hampden-TurnerC. (2012). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. McGraw-Hill.
42.
van DijkT. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
43.
van DijkT. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
44.
van DijkT. A. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
45.
van EerdeW.BuengelerC. (2015). Meetings all over the world: Structural and psychological characteristics of meetings in different countries. In AllenJ. A.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.RogelbergS. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 177-202). Cambridge University Press.
