The study seeks to add to the current debate on English as a lingua franca by analyzing the role of the native speakers of English in intercultural business negotiations and to what extent they effectively accommodate lingua franca speakers. The data, gathered from a sample of 14 native English speakers and 13 nonnative English speakers, consist of interactions collected through a discourse completion task and a short questionnaire. The results showed that the native speakers in this sample used a wider range of linguistic devices than the nonnative speakers. The majority of the native speakers attempted to accommodate nonnative speakers, but there was significant variation in the way that individual participants chose their strategies and approached accommodation. The most striking finding was the imbalance between the native speakers’ understanding of the issues of intercultural communication and their inability to effectively accommodate nonnative speakers. The implications are discussed.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. ( 1989). Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics (pp. 1-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
Bülow, A. (2009). Negotiation studies. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini (Ed.), The handbook of business discourse (pp. 142-154). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
Charles, M. ( 2007). Language matters in global communication: Article based on ORA lecture, October 2006. Journal of Business Communication , 44, 260-283.
4.
Crystal, D. ( 2003). English as a global language. Cambridge , England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Firth, A. ( 1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On "lingua franca" English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics , 26, 237-259.
6.
Firth, A. ( 2009). Doing not being a foreign language learner: English as a lingua franca in the workplace and (some) implications for SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 127-156.
7.
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. ( 1991). Language contexts and consequences. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
Gilsdorf, J. ( 2002). Standard Englishes and World Englishes: Living with a polymorph business language. Journal of Business Communication , 39, 364-378.
9.
Golato, A. ( 2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics , 24, 90-121.
10.
Graddol, D. ( 2006). English next. Why Global English may mean the end of "English as a foreign language." Retrieved from www.britishcouncil.org/learning-research-englishnext.htm
House, J. ( 2003). English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism ? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, 556-578.
13.
Jenkins, J. ( 2007). English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14.
Kasper, G. ( 2000). Data collection in pragmatic research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 316-341). London, England: Continuum.
15.
McEwen, V., & Coupland, N. ( 2000). Accommodation theory: A conceptual resource for intercultural sociolinguistics. In H. Spencer-Oates (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 191-214). London, England: Continuum.
16.
Meierkord, C. ( 2000). Interpreting successful lingua franca interaction. An analysis of non-native-/non-native small talk conversations in English ( Linguistik online5, 1/00). Retrieved from http://www.linguistik-online.com/1_00/MEIERKOR.HTM
17.
Nickerson, C. ( 2005). English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 367-380.
18.
Planken, B. ( 2005). Managing rapport in lingua franca sales negotiations: A comparison of professional and aspiring negotiators. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 381-400.
19.
Ritnell, E., & Mitchell, C.J. (1989). Studying requests and apologies: An enquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics (pp. 248-272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Rogerson-Revell, P. ( 2007). Using English for international business: AEuropean case study. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 103-120.
21.
Seidlhofer, B. ( 2000). Mind the gap: English as a mother tongue vs. English as a lingua franca. Vienna English Working Papers, 9, 51-69.
22.
Seidlhofer, B. ( 2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11133-158.
23.
Skapinker, M. ( 2007a). Clarity and the question of how the cookie crumbles . The Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/51e7424c-8e67-11dc-8591-0000779fd2ac.html
24.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London, England: Continuum.
25.
Skapinker, M. ( 2007b). Whose language?The Financial Times . Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e621ff38-8e1c-11dc-8591-0000779fd2ac.html
26.
Vuorela, T. ( 2005). How does a sales team reach goals in intercultural business negotiations? A case study. English for Specific Purposes , 24, 65-92.
