Team Communication in the Workplace: Interplay of Communication Channels and Performance

Abstract

This study examines how communication channel use explains the effectiveness of workplace team communication through Media Richness Theory and Media Synchronicity Theory. It examines how job characteristics, personal attributes, communication channel usage, and team performance are interrelated in the workplace. The results of an online survey of 400 full-time employees and executives of large Japanese companies show that team communication effectiveness, including the degree of team coordination, inclusion, and performance satisfaction, can be explained through a combination of rich (synchronous) and lean (asynchronous) media use. The implications of using communication channels in the workplace are also discussed.

Keywords

Media richness synchronous asynchronous computer-mediated communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anders

A. D.

Coleman

J. T.

Castleberry

S. B.

(2020). Communication preferences of business-to-business buyers for receiving initial sales messages: A comparison of media channel selection theories. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(3), 370-400.

Aritz

Walker

Cardon

P. W.

(2017). Media use in virtual teams of varying levels of coordination. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 222-243.

Baltes

B. B.

Dickson

M. W.

Sherman

M. P.

Bauer

C. C.

LaGanke

J. S.

(2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179. https://doi.org/10.10006/obhd.201.2961

Braun

Hernandez Bark

Kirchner

Stegmann

van Dick

(2015). Emails from the boss—Curse or blessing? Relations between communication channels, leader evaluation, and employees’ attitudes. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(1), 50-81.

Cardon

P. W.

(2023). Business communication: Developing leaders for a networked world (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Daft

R. L.

Lengel

R. H.

(1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191-233.

Daft

R. L.

Lengel

R. H.

(1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.

Dennis

A. R.

Fuller

R. M.

Valacich

J. S.

(2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575-600.

Dennis

A. R.

Valacich

J. S.

(1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10), Maui, HI. IEEE.

10.

Fleischmann

A. C.

Aritz

Cardon

(2019). Language proficiency and media richness in global virtual teams: Impacts on satisfaction, inclusion, and task accomplishment. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 2(4), 1-18.

11.

Fox

McEwan

(2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418

12.

Gilson

L. L.

Maynard

M. T.

Young

N. C. J.

Vartiainen

Hakonen

(2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946

13.

Kandola

(2006). The psychology of effective business communications in geographically dispersed teams. Cisco.

14.

Kingsley Westerman

C. Y.

Reno

K. M.

Heuett

K. B

. (2015). Delivering feedback: Supervisors’ source credibility and communication competence. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(4), 526-546.

15.

Lee

(2022). Dynamics of symmetrical communication within organizations: The impacts of channel usage of CEO, managers, and peers. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418803661

16.

Malhotra

Majchrzak

Rosen

(2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60-70.

17.

Maruping

L. L.

Agarwal

(2004). Managing team interpersonal process through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975-990.

18.

Murata

(2023). Yasashii Komyunikeshon: Omoiyari no gengogaku [Gentle communication: Linguistics of caring]. Iwanami Shoten.

19.

Pentland

A. S.

(2012). The new science of building great teams. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2012/04/the-new-science-of-building-great-teams

20.

Recruit Works Institute. (2020). Survey on management behavior 2019 [Manegimento koudou ni kansuruchousa 2019 Kihon Houkkousho]. Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://www.works-i.com/research/management2019

21.

Rice

R. E.

(1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475-500.

22.

Statistic Bureau of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2021). Labor force survey (basic tabulation) [Roudouryoku chousa kihon shukei]. Retrieved February 25, 2022, from https://www.stat.go.jp/data/roudou/sokuhou/nen/ft/index.html

23.

Turkle

(2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in the digital age. Penguin Press.

24.

van den Hooff

Groot

De Jonge

. (2005). Situational influences on the use of communication technologies: A meta-analysis and exploratory study. Journal of Business Communication, 42(1), 4-27.

25.

Webster

Hackley

(1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1282-1309. https://doi.org/10.2307/257034