Effective communication is critical to most organizational processes, including team collaboration and decision making. Face-to-face communication is commonly assumed to be superior to all other forms of communication, yet face-to-face communication does not cope well with organizational constraints such as time pressure or the geographic distribution of team members. A partial answer in overcoming some of these constraints may be computer-mediated asynchronous communication (CMAC). CMAC enables increased and more equal team member participation, offers flexibility over time and distance, creates time for additional reflection and thought by participants, and archives a permanent record of all discussion. CMAC overcomes some of the drawbacks common to face-to-face communication in some circumstances, thus enhancing organizational communication, team collaboration, and decision-making effectiveness.
Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253.
2.
Arrow, H., Berdahl, J. L., Bouas, B. S., Craig, K. M., Commings, A., Lebie, L., et al. (1996). Time, technology, and groups: An integration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 253-261.
3.
Beach, L. R., & Lipshitz, R. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 21-35). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1996). Image theory: The unifying perspective. In L. R. Beach (Ed.), Decision making in the workplace: A unifying perspective (pp. 1-20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Ben-Zur, H., & Breznitz, S. I. (1981). The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica, 47, 89-104.
6.
Berry, G. R. (2004). Lessons from the online teaching experience. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 5, 88-97.
7.
Chu, P. C., & Spries, E. E. (2001). Does time constraint on use negate the efficacy of decision support systems? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 226-249.
8.
Coopman, S. J. (2001). Democracy, performance, and outcomes in interdisciplinary health care teams. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 261-284.
9.
Dooley, R. S., Fryxell, G. E., & Judge, W. Q. (2000). Belaboring the not-so-obvious: Consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. Journal of Management, 26, 1237-1257.
10.
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
11.
Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2), 42-62.
12.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
13.
Glaser, H. (1996). Structure and struggle in egalitarian groups: Dimensions of power relations. Small Group Research, 27, 551-571.
14.
Hartley, P. (1997). Group communication. London: Routledge.
15.
Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenback, J. R. (1998). Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 76(1), 30-47.
16.
Hirokawa, R., Erbert, L., & Hurst, A. (1996). Communication and group decision-making effectiveness. In R. Hirokawa & M. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 269-300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Hollingshead, A. B., & Contractor, N. S. (2002). New media and organizing at the group level. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 221-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Jarboe, S. (1996). Procedures for enhancing group decision making. In R. Hirokawa & M. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 345-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
20.
Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
21.
Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. (1989). Impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 221-233.
22.
Maule, A. J. (1997). Strategies for adapting to time pressure. In R. Flin, E. Slas, M. Strub, & L. Martin (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications (pp. 271-279). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
23.
McDaniel, S., Olson, G., & Magee, J. (1996). Identifying and analyzing multiple threads in computer-mediated and face-to-face conversation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 39-47). Cambridge, MA: ACM Press.
24.
McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1990). Effects of technological enhancements on the flow of work in groups: Preliminary report of a systematic review of the research literature (Report 90-1). Urbana: University of Illinois.
25.
McLeod, P. L. (1996). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280.
26.
Mohammed, S., & Ringseis, E. (2001). Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 310-335.
27.
Nutt, P. C. (1998). Framing strategic decisions. Organizational Science, 9, 195-216.
28.
Orasanu, L., & Connolly, T. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 3-20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29.
Orasanu, L., & Salas, E. (1993). Team decision making in complex environments. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 327-345). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology. Organizational Science, 11(4), 404-428.
31.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145-165.
32.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 541-574.
33.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organizational Science, 13(6), 684-700.
34.
Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organizational Science, 6(4), 423-444.
35.
Perlow, L. A. (1999). Time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 57-81.
36.
Raffoni, M. (2000, Spring). Managing your virtual company: Create a communication plan. Harvard Management Communication Letter, pp. 7-8.
37.
Rudolph, J., & Repenning, N. P. (2002). Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of stress and interruptions in organizational collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 1-30.
38.
Schmitt, J. F., & Klein, G. A. (1998). Fighting in a fog: Dealing with battlefield uncertainty. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 3(1), 57-63.
39.
Schneider, S. L., & Shanteau, J. (2003). Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Seibold, D. (1995) Developing the “team” in a team-managed organization: Group facilitation in a new-design plant. In L. Frey (Ed.), Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings (pp. 282-298). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
41.
Seibold, D., Meyers, R., & Sunwolf. (1996). Communication and influence in group decision making. In R. Hirokawa & M. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 242-268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Sullivan, T. (1998). Concept analysis of collaboration: Part I. In T. Sullivan (Ed.), Collaboration: A health care imperative (pp. 3-42). New York: McGraw Hill.
43.
Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-469.
44.
Valacich, J. S., Jessup, L. M., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 219-241.
45.
Waller, M. J., Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Giambatista, R. C. (2002). Watching the clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1046-1055.
46.
Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated on-going interaction versus channel effects of relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
47.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal & hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
48.
Weick, K. E. (1987). Theorizing about organizational communication. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnum, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 97-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussions and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
50.
Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1124-1151.
51.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.
52.
Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. J., & Woerner, S. L. (2003). Virtual organizing: Using threads to coordinate distributed work. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii, College of Business.
53.
Yoshioka, T., Herman, G., Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2001). Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 19(4), 431-456.
54.
Zakay, D. (1993). The impact of time perception on decision making under time stress. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 59-72). New York: Plenum.
