The suppression of information from a project manager to a project sponsor might be based on perceived project sponsor behaviors. To gain greater insight into this phenomenon, an exploratory topic modeling analysis was performed on project manager responses (n = 185) to an open-ended question related to the withholding of project information. A key conclusion of this study was that project managers may withhold information from project sponsors if they perceive unreceptiveness to receiving unfavorable project information. This study provides a foundation for future empirical research related to project manager perceptions of project sponsor behaviors within the context of project communication.
AguillonS.Cronin-GilmoreJ. (2024). How remote work changes communication in organizations. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 24(3), 173–185.
2.
AlparslanA. M.CanA.ErdemR. (2015). Reasons for employee silence behavior: Developing and validating a scale for nurses, H.U. Journal of Health Administration, 18(2), 183–204.
3.
ArunR.SureshV.Veni MadhavanC. E.Narasimha MurthyM. N. (2010). On finding the natural number of topics with latent Dirichlet allocation: Some observations. Proceedings of the 14th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining–Volume Part I (pp. 391–402). Springer-Verlag.
4.
AyubA.SultanaF.IqbalS.AbdullahM.KhanN. (2021). Coping with workplace ostracism through ability-based emotional intelligence. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(5), 969–989.
5.
BainK.KrepsT. A.MeikleN. L.TenneyE. R. (2021). Amplifying voice in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1288–1312.
6.
BarndtD. (1981). Upward communication filtering in the project management environment. Project Management Quarterly, 12(1), 39–43.
7.
BeakleyJ. E. (2016). Supervisor-subordinate communication: Workplace bullying and the tyrannical MUM effect. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 1–21.
8.
BenoitK.WatanabeK.WangH.NultyP.ObengA.MüllerS.MatsuoA. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open-Source Software, 3(30), Article 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
9.
BischofJ.AiroldiE. (2012). Summarizing topical content with word frequency and exclusivity. In LangfordJ.PineauJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-12) (pp. 201–208). Omnipress.
10.
BreeseR.CouchO.TurnerD. (2020). The project sponsor role and benefits realisation: More than just doing the day job. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 17–26.
11.
BuceroA. (2024). Project sponsor effectiveness and project success. European Project Management Journal, 14(2), 3–16.
12.
CaoJ.XiaT.LiJ.ZhangY.TangS. (2009). A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection. Neurocomputing, 72(7–9), 1775–1781.
13.
CarreiraC.MendesA.FerreiraJ. F.ChristinN. (2025). A systematic review of security communication strategies: Guidelines and open challenges. arXivLabs. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02109
14.
ChamberlinM.NewtonD. W.LePineJ. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11–71.
15.
ChangJ.Boyd-GraberJ.WangC.GerrishS.BleiD. M. (2009). Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (22), 288–296.
16.
ChenX.XieH.TaoX.XuL.WangJ.DaiH. N.WangF. L. (2024). A topic modeling-based bibliometric exploration of automatic summarization research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 14(5), Article e1540.
17.
ChengY. N.HuC.WangS.HuangJ. C. (2024). Political context matters: A joint effect of coercive power and perceived organizational politics on abusive supervision and silence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(1), 81–106.
18.
ChurchillR.SinghL. (2021). textprep: A text preprocessing toolkit for topic modeling on social media data. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications-DATA (pp. 60–70). SciTePress.
19.
CoakleyN. (2021). The relationship between toxic leadership behavior and employee silence: A quantitative study. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3893817
20.
DetertJ. R.EdmondsonA. C. (2006). Everyday failures in organizational learning: Explaining the high threshold for speaking up at work. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 6(024), 1–61.
21.
DeveaudR.SanJuanE.BellotP. (2014). Accurate and effective latent concept modeling for ad hoc information retrieval. Document Numerique, 17(1), 61–84.
22.
DinoA.KaramayA. (2025). Leadership communication in project management in Indonesia. Communicology: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(1), 47–55.
23.
DuttonJ. E.AshfordS. I. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 397–428.
24.
EkrotB.RankJ.GemündenH. G. (2016). Antecedents of project managers voice behavior: The moderating effect of organization-based self-esteem and affective organizational commitment. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 1028–1042.
ErkutluH.ChafraJ. (2019). Leader’s integrity and employee silence in healthcare organizations. Leadership in Health Services, 32(3), 419–434.
27.
EunjeongJ.Youn-JengC. (2023). Study on the appropriate sample size of LDA topic modeling using high school credit system news articles. Korean Society for Educational Evaluation, 36(3), 365–404.
Fitkov-NorrisE.KochevaN. (2023). Are we there yet? Thematic analysis, NLP, and machine learning for research. In ECRM 2023 22nd European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management (pp. 93–102). Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.
GainesJ. H. (1980). Upward communication in industry: An experiment. Human Relations, 33(12), 929–942.
33.
GillardS. (2005). Managing IT projects: Communication pitfalls and bridges. Journal of Information Science, 31(1), 37–43.
34.
GriffithsT. L.SteyversM. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl. 1), 5228–5235.
GuenterH.SchreursB.van EmmerikI. H.SunS. (2017). What does it take to break the silence in teams: Authentic leadership and/or proactive followership?Applied Psychology, 66(1), 49–77.
37.
GuntzburgerY.HadengueM. (2025). Providing a comprehensive thematic review of the Science-Policy Interface (SPI): A probabilistic topic modeling approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 163(103966), 1–17.
38.
GuptaR. K.AgarwallaR.NaikB. H.EvuriJ. R.ThapaA.SinghT. D. (2022). Prediction of research trends using LDA based topic modeling. Global Transitions Proceedings, 3(1), 298–304.
39.
HamidM.AhmadA.AimeurE. (2019). Factors contributing in failures of software projects. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 19(5), 62–77.
40.
HatipogluB.IneImenK. (2017). Demographic diversity in workplace and its impact on employee voice: The role of trust in the employer. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5), 970–994.
41.
HouselT. J.DavisW. E. (1977). The reduction of upward communication distortion. Journal of Business Communication, 14(4), 49–65.
42.
HubbartJ. A. (2025). Organizational consequences of strategic vision withholding: Stages of strategic neglect. Journal of Research in Business and Management, 13(6), 68–80.
43.
JavadiM.ZareaK. (2016). Understanding thematic analysis and its pitfall. Journal of Client Care, 1(1), 34–40.
44.
JiangS.MaG.WangD.JiaJ. (2023). How inclusive leadership influences voice behavior in construction project teams: A social identity perspective. Project Management Journal, 54(2), 116–131.
KalfaS.KwonB.ProuskaR.WilkinsonA. (2026). Disconnected workers: Can digital voice fill the gap?Human Resource Management Journal, 36(1), 32–47.
47.
KehindeS. (2025). Remote project management: Tools and techniques for effective delivery in a virtual environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technological Development, 1(1), 10–22.
48.
KeilM.RobeyD. (2001). Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects. Communications of the ACM, 44(4), 87–93.
49.
KeilM.SmithH. J.IacovouC. L.ThompsonR. L. (2014). The dynamics of it project status reporting: A self-reinforcing cycle of distrust. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(12), 879–912.
50.
KeilM.SmithH. J.PawlowskiS.LeighJ. (2004). Why didn’t somebody tell me? Climate, information asymmetry, and bad news about troubled projects. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(2), 65–84.
51.
KelleyH. H. (1951). Communication in experimentally created hierarchies. Human Relations, 4(1), 39–56.
KhanK. I.SaleemS.SheerazM.ImtiazU. (2021). Breaking silence and improving performance: How subordinates feeling trusted, and loyalty towards supervisors mediates the relationship between ethical leadership and project team members silence. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(6S), 1–18.
54.
KhanM.WilkinsonA.DonagheyJ. (2025). Forging new voice mechanisms from a crisis: Employee voice on social media during COVID-19. Human Resource Management Journal, 35(1), 1–22.
55.
KimH. S.WangJ. (2024). Silence in the workplace: What do we know from research?European Journal of Training and Development, 48(10), 56–83.
56.
KnollM.NevesP.SchynsB.MeyerB. (2021). A multi-level approach to direct and indirect relationships between organizational voice climate, team manager openness, implicit voice theories, and silence. Applied Psychology, 70(2), 606–642.
57.
KörnerR.OverbeckJ. R.SchützA. (2025). Structuring hierarchy concepts: Evaluating measures of power, status, dominance, and prestige on the basis of an integrative model and systematic literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 151(3), 322–364.
58.
KorzaanM.BrooksN. (2015). The silent treatment in IT Projects: Gender differences in inclinations to communicate project status information. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 8(1), 19–30.
59.
KoseT.TubaB.OncuH. (2022). Completing projects on time and budget: A study on the analysis of project monitoring practices using real data. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 1–12.
60.
KrenzH. L.BurtscherM. J. (2021). Investigating voice in action teams: A critical review. Cognition, Technology and Work, 23(3), 605–624.
61.
LarsonE. W.GrayC. F. (2020). Project management: The managerial process (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
62.
LauferA.LittleT.RussellJ.MaasB. (2018). Becoming a project leader. Springer International Publishing.
63.
LauesenS. (2020). IT project failures, causes and cures. IEEE Access, 8, 72059–72067.
64.
LeeH.KeilM.SmithH.SarkarS. (2017). The roles of mood and conscientiousness in 1037 reporting of self-committed errors on IT projects. Information Systems Journal, 27(5), 589–617.
65.
LeeH.ParkJ. G.LeeJ. (2021). Knowledge sharing in ISD projects: Role of task interdependence and social capital. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 580–599.
66.
LeeC. H.YuanC. W. (2024). The hidden toll of instant messaging use in remote work: Interaction dynamics between subordinates and supervisors. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15). ACM.
67.
LiA.KongD.ZhouZ.CrossleyC.LinQ. (2025). I just need to say something: A self-determination model of voice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(5), 789–811.
68.
LiangJ.FarhC. I.FarhJ. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92.
69.
LiaoC.LiZ.HuangL. (2024). How does psychological contract breach affect employee silence? A moderated mediation model. SAGE Open, 14(4), 1–16.
70.
LiyanagamageN. (2024). Navigating Machiavellianism in construction projects: Leaders’ communication strategies and employees voice. Journal of Management in Engineering, 40(6. pp. 040240561–0402405612.
71.
MadagáinD. B. Ó.KirwanC. E.O’RiordanC. (2025). The influence of cognitive communication factors on the preparation of financial narrative board reports. Accounting, Finance & Governance Review, 33, 1–22.
72.
MaierD.WaldherrA.MiltnerP.WiedemannG.NieklerA.KeinertA.PfetschB.HeyerG.ReberU.H¨ausslerT.Schmid-PetriH.AdamS. (2021). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. In van AtteveldtW.PengT.-Q. (Eds.), Computational methods for communication science (pp. 13–38). Routledge.
73.
MasekoM.ZhouT. G.TsokotaT. (2020). A framework to manage reluctance to bad news reporting on software projects in state universities in Zimbabwe. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5549–5564.
74.
McCroskeyJ. C.BeattyM. J. (1998). Communication apprehension. In McCroskeyJ. C.DalyJ. A.MartinM. M.BeattyM. J. (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 215–232). Hampton Press, Inc.
75.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. The Southern Communication Journal, 56(1), 72–77.
76.
MellingerG. D. (1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52(3), 304–309.
77.
MimnoD.WallachH. M.TalleyE.LeendersM.McCallumA. (2011). Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 262–272). Association for Computational Linguistics.
78.
MorrisonE. W. (2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 79–107.
79.
MorrisonE. W.MillikenF. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.
80.
MorrisonK.McCornackS. A. (2026). Can we be honest? Cognition, intention, speech production, and the future of deception research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 45(1), 122–146.
81.
MubarakN.KhanJ.OsmadiA. (2022). How does leader’s knowledge hiding kill innovative work behavior. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(7), 1048–1063.
82.
MughalM.BahaudinA.SallehN. (2019). Behavioral factors for IT project success in Pakistan: Moderating effect of leadership styles. Management Science Letters, 9(7), 987–996.
83.
MumfordC. (2015). Withholding communication - A relational approach to silence in an inter-organisational project group in the UK [PhD thesis, The Open University, United Kingdom].
84.
MysoreK.KirytopoulosK.AhnS.MaT. (2021). Adversarial factors in multi- stakeholders’ engagement of global-IT projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(2), 445–471.
85.
NieberleK. W.FladererM. P. (2025). Voice echoes: A critical review and future research agenda on the consequences of employee voice for voicers, their co-workers, and managers. Organizational Psychology Review, 15(2), 209–255.
NuijtenA.KeilM.CommandeurH. (2016). Collaborative partner or opponent: How the messenger influences the deaf effect in IT projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(6), 534–552.
88.
O’ReillyC. A.III. (1978). The intentional distortion of information in organizational communication. Human Relations, 31(2), 173–193.
89.
ParkC.ImG. P.KeilM. (2008). Overcoming the MUM effect in IT project reporting: The effect of time pressure and blame shifting. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 409–431.
90.
ParkeM. R.TangiralaS.SanariaA.EkkiralaS. (2022). How strategic silence enables employee voice to be valued and rewarded. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 173, Article 104183.
91.
PerkinsD. (2014). Conceptualizing defensive silence in project-manager-to-project-sponsor communication. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(1), 2–19.
92.
PetterS. (2018). If you can’t say something nice: Factors contributing to team member silence in distributed software project teams. Proceedings of ACM SIGMIS-CPR ‘18 (pp. 43–49). ACM.
93.
PinderC. C.HarlosK. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In FerrisG. R. (Ed.). Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 331–369). JAI Press.
94.
Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th ed.). https://www.pmi.org/standards/pmbok
95.
PutroH. P. (2023). Building digital communication effectiveness in organizations. Journal of Data Science, 1(2), 61–67.
96.
RobertsK. H.O’ReillyC. A.III. (1974). Failures in upward communication in organizations: Three possible culprits. Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 205–215.
97.
RogersD. P. (1987). The development of a measure of perceived communication openness. Journal of Business Communication, 24(4), 53–61.
98.
RosenS.TesserA. (1970). On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. Sociometry, 33(3), 253–263.
99.
RosenS.TesserA. (1972). Fear of negative evaluation and the reluctance to transmit bad news. Journal of Communication, 22(2), 124–141.
100.
RubbabU.IrshadM.NaqviS. M. M. R. (2023). Impact of team voice on employee voice behavior: Role of felt obligation for constructive change and supervisor expectations for voice, Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 11(3), 335–351.
101.
RusD.SleebosE.WisseB. (2025). Fear is the path to the dark side: The interplay of leader fear of power loss and leader Machiavellianism on abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 41, 530–543.
102.
RyanK. D.OestreichD. K. (1998). Driving fear out of the workplace: How to overcome the invisible barriers to quality, productivity, and innovation. Jossey-Bass.
103.
ŞahinS.ÇankirB.ArslanB. S. (2021). Effect of implicit voice theories on employee constructive voice and defensive silence: A study in education and health sector. Organizacija, 54(3), 210–226.
104.
SahlmuellerB.Van QuaquebekeN.GiessnerS. R.van KnippenbergD. (2022). Dual leadership in the matrix: Effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) and dual-leader exchange (DLX) on role conflict and dual leadership effectiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(3), 270–288.
ShahM. S.AhmadI.UllahM.KhanA. (2023). Reconceptualizing the relationship between shared leadership and project success: Testing a moderated-mediation model using PLS approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 27(3, 4), 1–31.
107.
ShertzerY.Brender-IlanY. (2023). Why do leaders escalate their commitment to a failed course of action? A moderated-mediation personality traits model. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440231154456.
108.
SmithH. J.KeilM. (2003). The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: A theoretical model. Information Systems Journal, 13(1), 69–95.
109.
SnowA. P.KeilM.WallaceL. (2007). The effects of optimistic and pessimistic biasing on software project status reporting. Information & Management, 44(2), 130–141.
110.
SonS.YangT. S.ParkJ. (2023). How organizational politics and subjective social status moderate job insecurity–silence relationships. Journal of Management and Organization, 29(2), 266–286.
111.
SussmanS. W.SproullL. (1999). Straight talk: Delivering bad news through electronic communication. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 150–166.
112.
TrimbleD. E. (2006). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intention of missionaries. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34(4), 349–360.
113.
TurnerR. J.MüllerR. (2004). Communication and cooperation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent. European Management Journal, 22(3), 327–336.
114.
UmorenP. E.UkpeA. P. (2025). Digital communication in organizations: Trends, strengths, and weaknesses. Direct Research Journal of Management and Strategic Studies, 6(1), 55–64.
115.
VakolaM.BouradasD. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organizational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27(4/5), 441–458.
116.
Van DyneL.AngS.BoteroI. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392.
117.
VerčičA. T.VerčičD. (2025). The internal communication paradox: Balancing digital convenience with face-to-face satisfaction. Public Relations Review, 51(3), 61–67.
WangL.BariM. W.ShaheenS.ZhongK. (2024). Impostor leader and knowledge hiding: Attachment avoidance as underlying mechanism. Acta Psychologica, 244, 1–12.
120.
WeiL. M.PiawC. Y.KannanS.MoulodS. A. (2016). Relationship between teacher ICT competency and teacher acceptance and use of school management system (SMS). Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 36–52.
121.
WheelerJ. M.CohenA. S.XiongJ.LeeJ.ChoiH. J. (2021). Sample size for latent Dirichlet allocation of constructed-response items. In WibergM.MolenaarD.GonzálezJ.BöckenholtU.KimJ.-S. (Eds.), Quantitative psychology: IMPS 2020 (pp. 263–273). Springer.
YoungR.ChenW.QuaziA.ParryW.WongA.PoonS. K. (2020). The relationship between project governance mechanisms and project success: An international data set. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(7), 1496–1521.
126.
ZanderK. K.GarnettS. T.SterlyH.SterlyH.Ayeb-KarlssonS.ŠedováB.Lotze-CampenH.RicherzhagenC.BaggenH. (2022). Topic modeling exposes disciplinary divergence in research on the nexus between human mobility and the environment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–9.
127.
ZhangH.CaoW. (2021). How can the silence be broken? Caring ethical climate and employee silence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49(2), 1–12.
128.
ZhangZ.MinM. (2019). The negative consequences of knowledge hiding in NPD project teams: The roles of project work attributes. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 225–238.
129.
ZhuF.WangL.YuM.MüllerR.SunX. (2019). Transformational leadership and project team members’ silence: The mediating role of feeling trusted. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(4), 845–868.
130.
ZwikaelO.MeredithJ. R.SmyrkJ. (2015). Project governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 852–862.
