Imagined interactions (IIs) are conversational daydreams communicators can use to envision how interactions might unfold prospectively or how they might have unfolded differently in retrospect. In this study, imagined interactions with the boss (IIB) were investigated alongside employees’ upward dissent and silence. Analyses of survey responses from U.S. working adults (N = 322) revealed that three functions (rehearsal, relationship management, and compensation) and three characteristics (frequency, proactivity, and specificity) of IIB were associated with various upward dissent or defensive silence strategies. The general pattern of findings indicated that when employees reported rehearsal or relationship management IIB, they tended to select communicatively-competent dissent strategies (e.g., prosocial dissent). The study is the first of its kind to associate IIB with upward dissent selection. Implications for theory and practice conclude the paper.
BiselR. S. (2018). Organizational moral learning: A communication approach. Routledge.
3.
BiselR. S.ArterburnE. N. (2012). Making sense of organizational members’ silence: A sensemaking-resource model. Communication Research Reports, 29(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.684985
4.
BiselR. S.MessersmithA. S.KelleyK. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication: Hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. International Journal of Business Communication, 49(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612436972
5.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
6.
CarpenterG. W. (2022). Imagine me and you, I do: Characteristics and functions of imagined interactions during online dating. Imagination, Cognition and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, 41(3), 323–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366211050644
7.
DetertJ. R.EdmondsonA. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
8.
EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S. (1988). Imagined interaction as an element of social cognition. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318809389623
9.
EidenmullerM.HoneycuttJ. M. (2010). Characteristics and functions of imagined interactions compared to private prayer. In HoneycuttJ. M. (Ed.), Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction (pp. 83–98). Hampton Press.
10.
GarnerJ. T. (2012). Making waves at work: Perceived effectiveness and appropriateness of organizational dissent messages. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911431803
11.
GarnerJ. T. (2013). Dissenters, managers, and coworkers: The process of co-constructing organizational dissent and dissent effectiveness. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913488946
12.
GarnerJ. T. (2022). Exploring collective and multi-audience dissent in organizational meetings. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(4), 736–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221088297
13.
GoodboyA. K.BolkanS.GoldmanZ. W. (2015). Students' imagined interactions as intrapersonal explanations for instructional dissent. Communication Reports, 28(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2014.936563
14.
HannawaA. F.SpitzbergB. H. (2015). Introduction. In HannawaA. F.SpitzbergB. H. (Eds.), Communication competency (pp. 3–10). De Gruyter Mouton.
15.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2003). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication. Hampton Press.
16.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interactions. Hampton Press.
17.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2015). Imagined interaction theory. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 77–87). Sage.
HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR. (1990). Imagined interaction and interpersonal communication. Communication Reports, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219009367494
21.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
22.
KassingJ. W. (1997). Articulating, antagonizing, and displacing: A model of employee dissent. Communication Studies, 48(4), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368510
23.
KassingJ. W. (2002). Speaking up: Identifying employees’ upward dissent strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237234
24.
KassingJ. W. (2005). Speaking up competently: A comparison of perceived competence in upward dissent strategies. Communication Research Reports, 22(3), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036810500230651
25.
KassingJ. W. (2007). Going around the boss: Exploring the consequences of circumvention. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318907302020
26.
KassingJ. W. (2009). “In case you didn't hear me the first time”: An examination of repetitious upward dissent. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 416–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908327008
27.
KassingJ. W. (2011). Dissent in organizations. Polity.
28.
KassingJ. W.ArmstrongT. A. (2002). Someone’s going to hear about this: Examining the association between dissent-triggering events and employees’ dissent expression. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902161002
29.
KassingJ. W.KavaW. (2013). Assessing disagreement expressed to management: Development of the upward dissent scale. Communication Research Reports, 30(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.746225
30.
KeytonJ.CaputoJ. M.FordE. A.FuR.LeibowitzS. A.LiuT.PolasikS. S.GhoshP.WuC. (2013). Investigating verbal workplace communication behaviors. Journal of Business Communication, 50(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612474990
31.
LaneS. D. (2016). Interpersonal communication: Competence and contexts. Routledge.
32.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
33.
MillikenF. J.MorrisonE. W.HewlinP. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
OkaforB. E.YakubovaM. M.WestermanC. Y. (2020). Manager-employee communication: The influence of temperament and leader-member exchange quality on employees’ use of upward dissent strategies. Western Journal of Communication, 85(3), 400–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2020.1850850
37.
ReddingC. W.. (1985). Rocking boats, blowing whistles, and teaching speech communication. Communication Education, 34(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528509378613
38.
RedmondV.JamesonJ. K.BinderA. R. (2016). How superior-subordinate relationship quality and conflict management styles influence an employee's use of upward dissent tactics. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 9(2), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12072
39.
RiceC.SearleR. H. (2022). The enabling role of internal organizational communication in insider threat activity–evidence from a high security organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(3), 467–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211062250
40.
SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Sage.
41.
TourishD.RobsonP. (2006). Sensemaking and the distortion of critical upward communication in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00608
42.
van DyneL.AngS.BoteroI. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384
43.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. John Wiley and Sons.
44.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
45.
ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ. M. (1992). The role of mental imagery and emotion in imagined interaction. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369820
46.
ZaninA. C.BiselR. S. (2023). Structurational divergence, implicit orientations to active followership, and employees’ selection of upward dissent strategies and silence. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221146186
47.
ZaninA. C.BiselR. S.AdameE. A. (2016). Supervisor moral talk contagion and trust-in-supervisor: Mitigating the workplace moral mum effect. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915619755
48.
ZengC.RahmaniD.OkaforB. (2022). An investigation of the mediating role of Organizational trust in the relationship between work rumination and organizational dissent. Communication Studies, 73(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2089190
