This article examines how recruiters navigate competing interactional workplace norms in job interviews. We focus in particular on smiling in recruiters’ impression management because it is situated at the nexus of the choice between more traditional and modern interactional norms for recruitment. We use multimodal discourse analysis to study a dataset of video-recordings of thirteen authentic job interviews, which we complemented with video-stimulated (VS)-interviews with all the recruiters. After qualitatively analyzing recruiters’ smiling behavior during the job interviews, we critically teased out how they reflected on their own behavior in the VS-interviews. Our findings reveal the complex nature of the indexical meanings of smiles and highlight the potential conflicts between different norms reported by recruiters in their impression management practices. Our study calls for a critical reconsideration of how smiling is approached in impression management research and further questions how recruiters strategically employ relational elements, like smiling, for instrumental purposes.
AmaralA. A.PowellD. M.HoJ. L. (2019). Why does impression management positively influence interview ratings? The mediating role of competence and warmth. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12260
2.
AndriesF.MeisslK.de VriesC.FeyaertsK.ObenB.SambreP.VermeerbergenM.BrôneG. (2023). Multimodal stance-taking in interaction: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1–16.
CallejasZ.RavenetB.OchsM.PelachaudC. (2014). A computational model of social attitudes for a virtual recruiter [Conference session]. 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Paris, France (pp. 93–100).
CampionM. A.PursellE. D.BrownB. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00630.x
10.
CouplandJ. (2000). Introduction: Sociolinguistic perspectives on small talk. In CouplandJ. (Ed.), Small talk (2014th ed., pp. 32–61). Routledge.
11.
De DijnM.Van De MieroopD. (2023). Rapport-building attempts in technology-mediated job interviews during the COVID-19 crisis. Linguistics Vanguard. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0117
12.
De DijnM.Van De MieroopD. (2024). Interactionally negotiating power in “War for Talent”-job interviews. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 18(1), 1–33.
13.
Du BoisJ. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In EnglebretsonR. (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
14.
EkmanP. (1985). Telling lies. Berkeley Books.
15.
FairhurstG. T. (2007). Discursive leadership: In conversation with leadership psychology. Sage.
16.
FrischenA.BaylissA. P.TipperS. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
17.
GeeJ. P.HullG.LankshearC. (1996). The New Work Order: Behind the language of the New Capitalism. Allen and Unwin.
HenkinR. (2019). Inclusive generic person in women’s discourse in Israeli Hebrew and Negev Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 150, 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.013
23.
HolmesJ.MarraM. (2017). You’re a proper tradesman mate: Identity struggles and workplace transitions in New Zealand. In VanD.MieroopDeSchnurrS. (Eds.), Identity struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world (pp. 127–145). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
24.
HuffcuttA. I.Van IddekingeC. H.RothP. L. (2011). Understanding applicant behavior in employment interviews: A theoretical model of interviewee performance. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.05.003
25.
JakonenT.EvnitskayaN. (2020). Teacher smiles as an interactional and pedagogical resource in the classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 163, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.005
26.
JeffersonG. (1984). Transcription notation. In AtkinsonJ. M.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 191–222). Cambridge University Press.
27.
KellyS. D.ÖzyürekA.MarisE. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(2), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357327
28.
Kristof-BrownA.GuayR. P. (2011). Person–environment fit. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–50). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-001
29.
LevashinaJ.HartwellC. J.MorgesonF. P.CampionM. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12052
30.
LiX. (2021). Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics, 7(1), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0164
LipovskyC. (2008). It’s really a great presentation!’: Appraising candidates in job interviews. Linguistics & the Human Sciences, 4(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i2.161
33.
MartinJ.RychlowskaM.WoodA.NiedenthalP. (2017). Smiles as multipurpose social signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 864–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.08.007
34.
MondadaL. (2016a). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177
MuntiglP.KnightN.WatkinsA. (2012). Working to keep aligned in psychotherapy: Using nods as a dialogic resource to display affiliation. Language and Dialogue, 2(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.1.01mun
37.
NaimI.TanveerMd. I.GildeaD.HoqueM. E. (2018). Automated analysis and prediction of job interview performance. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 9(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2614299
38.
NeefsB.VansteenkisteS. (2022). De aanwervingsbehoefte in de Vlaamse sectoren richting 2030. Tijdschrift van Het Steunpunt Werk, 32(1), 29–40.
39.
OittinenT. (2018). Multimodal accomplishment of alignment and affiliation in the local space of distant meetings. Culture and Organization, 24(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2017.1386189
40.
PeräkyläA.VehviläinenS. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society, 14(6), 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003
41.
PomerantzA. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2/3), 219–229.
42.
PomerantzA. (2005). Using participants’ video-stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices. In te MolderH.PotterJ. (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 93–113). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489990.005
43.
RashotteL. S. (2002). What does that smile mean? The meaning of nonverbal behaviors in social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090170
44.
RobertsC.CampbellS. (2005). Fitting stories into boxes: Rhetorical and textual constraints on candidates’ performances in British job interviews. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2005.2.1.45
45.
RubenM. A.HallJ. A.Schmid MastM. (2015). Smiling in a job interview: When less is more. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.972312
46.
RuusuvuoriJ.PeräkyläA. (2009). Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296499
47.
SacksH.SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
48.
SalomaaE.Van De MieroopD.LehtinenE. (2024). Negotiating leader identities through indirect mockery in talk about decision-making in a distributed leadership context. Language and Dialogue, 14(1), 122–151. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00162.sal
49.
SchlenkerB. R.PontariB. A. (2000). The strategic control of information: Impression management and self-presentation in daily life. In TesserA.FelsonR. B.SulsJ. M. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 199–232). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10357-008
50.
SchnurrS.Van De MieroopD. (2017). Identity struggles. John Benjamins.
51.
StiversT.SidnellJ. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
52.
van BraakM.GiroldiE.HuiskesM.DiemersA. D.VeenM.van den BergP. (2021). A participant perspective on collaborative reflection: Video-stimulated interviews show what residents value and why. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26(3), 865–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10026-7
53.
Van De MieroopD. (2020). A deontic perspective on the collaborative, multimodal accomplishment of leadership. Leadership, 16(5), 592–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019893824
54.
Van De MieroopD.De DijnM. (2024). Clashing ideological frameworks in a Belgian job interview with a Sierra Leonean candidate. In GintsburgS.BreezeR. (Eds.), African migrations: Traversing hybrid landscapes (pp. 59–85). Lexington Books.
55.
WilhelmyA.KleinmannM.KönigC. J.MelchersK. G.TruxilloD. M. (2016). How and why do interviewers try to make impressions on applicants? A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000046
56.
YuK. Y. T. (2019). Influencing how one is seen by potential talent: Organizational impression management among recruiting firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(7), 888–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000386
