This study explores graphical depictions in annual and corporate social responsibility reports. The 10 largest Canadian corporations in the oil and gas industry were selected to focus on graph selectivity, enhancement, and distortions as impression management strategies. The results show evidence of selectivity and enhancement. However, unlike previous studies on graphical distortions, there is no evidence of favorable distortions in graphs. The graphs reported are well depicted and not distorted, indicating that this industry is rather cautious in its reporting. Potential explanations and reasons why this might be the case are offered. This study suggests the concept of “plausible deniability” in the context of graph manipulations.
ArendtC.LaFlecheM.LimperopulosM. A. (2017). A qualitative meta-analysis of apologia, image repair, and crisis communication: Implications for theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 517–526.
2.
AshforthB. E.GibbsB. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.
3.
BeattieV.DhananiA.JonesM. J. (2008). Investigating presentational change in UK annual reports: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Business Communication, 45(2), 181–222.
4.
BeattieV.JonesM. J. (1992). The use and abuse of graphs in annual reports: Theoretical framework and empirical study. Accounting and Business Research, 22(88), 291–303.
5.
BeattieV.JonesM. J. (1999). Australian financial graphs: An empirical study. Abacus, 35(1), 46–76.
6.
BeattieV.JonesM. J. (2000a). Changing graph use in corporate annual reports: A time-series analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(2), 213–226.
7.
BeattieV.JonesM. J. (2000b). Impression management: The case of inter-country financial graphs. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 159–183.
8.
BeattieV.JonesM. J. (2001). A six-country comparison of the use of graphs in annual reports. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(2), 195–222.
9.
BeattieV.JonesM. J. (2002). Measurement distortion of graphs in corporate reports: An experimental study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(4), 546–564.
10.
BeattieV.JonesM. J. (2008). Corporate reporting using graphs: A review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 27, 71–110.
11.
BerthelotS.CoulmontM.SerretV. (2012). Do investors value sustainability reports? A Canadian study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(6), 355–363.
BolinoM. C.KacmarK. M.TurnleyW. H.GilstrapJ. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080–1109.
14.
BrisbaneA. (1911). Speakers give sound advice. Syracuse Post Standard.
ChoC. H.MichelonG.PattenD. M. (2012a). Enhancement and obfuscation through the use of graphs in sustainability reports: An international comparison. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 74–88.
18.
ChoC. H.MichelonG.PattenD. M. (2012b). Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1), 16–37.
19.
ClevelandW. S.McGillM. E.McGillR. (1988). The shape parameter of a two-variable graph. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(402), 289–300.
20.
CourtisJ. K. (1997). Corporate annual report graphical communication in Hong Kong: Effective or misleading?Journal of Business Communication, 34(3), 269–284.
DeeganC.UnermanJ. (2011). Financial accounting theory: European Edition (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
23.
Del BaldoM.DillardJ.BaldarelliM.-G.CiambottiM (Eds.). (2020). Accounting, accountability and society: Trends and perspectives in reporting, management and governance for sustainability. Springer International Publishinghttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41142-8
24.
Deloitte. (2015). Is more less? Exploring a new world of corporate reporting. Deloitte.
25.
DillaW. N.JanvrinD. J. (2010). Voluntary disclosure in annual reports: The association between magnitude and direction of change in corporate financial performance and graph use. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.257
26.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2022). 2030 emissions reduction plan: Canada’s next steps to clean air and a strong economy. Environment and Climate Change Canada [Environnement et changement climatique Canada].
27.
FalschlungerL. M.EislC.LosbichlerH.GreilA. M. (2015). Impression management in annual reports of the largest European companies: A longitudinal study on graphical representations. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(3), 383–399.
28.
Frownfelter-LohrkeC.FulkersonC. L. (2001). The incidence and quality of graphics in annual reports: An international comparison. Journal of Business Communication, 38(3), 337–357.
29.
HandJ. (1990). A test of the extended functional fixation hypothesis. The Accounting Review, 65(4), 739.
30.
HarrisR. L. (1999). Information graphics: A comprehensive illustrated reference. Oxford University Press.
31.
HraskyS. (2012). Visual disclosure strategies adopted by more and less sustainability-driven companies. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 154–165.
32.
JackL. (Ed.). (2013). The Routledge companion to accounting communication. Routledge.
33.
JonesM.MelisA.GaiaS.AresuS. (2018). Does graphical reporting improve risk disclosure? Evidence from European banks. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(1), 161–180.
34.
JonesM. J. (2011). The nature, use and impression management of graphs in social and environmental accounting. Accounting Forum, 35(2), 75–89.
35.
JonesM. J.MelisA.GaiaS.AresuS. (2020). Impression management and retrospective sense-making in corporate annual reports: Banks’ graphical reporting during the global financial crisis. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(4), 474–496.
36.
LeachR. (1985, April18). Anatomy of a takeover bid. Accountant.
37.
LeachR. (1988, January). Let the message dictate the medium. Accountancy, 93–94.
38.
LeuzC.VerrecchiaR. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91.
39.
MatherD.MatherP.RamsayA. (2005). An investigation into the measurement of graph distortion in financial reports. Accounting and Business Research, 35(2), 147–160.
40.
MatherP.RamsayA.SerryA. (1996). The use and representational faithfulness of graphs in annual reports: Australian evidence. Australian Accounting Review, 6(12), 56–63.
41.
MatherP.RamsayA.SteenA. (2000). The use and representational faithfulness of graphs in Australian IPO prospectuses. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 65–83.
42.
Merkl-DaviesD. M.BrennanN. M. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management?Journal of Accounting Literature, 27, 93.
43.
Merkl-DaviesD. M.BrennanN. M. (2017). A theoretical framework of external accounting communication: Research perspectives, traditions, and theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 433–469.
44.
MuiñoF.TrombettaM. (2009). Does graph disclosure bias reduce the cost of equity capital?Accounting and Business Research, 39(2), 83–102.
SteinbartP. J. (1989). The auditor’s responsibility for the accuracy of graphs in annual reports: Some evidence of the need for additional guidance. Accounting Horizons, 3(3), 60.
51.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
TitusV. K.ParkerO.BassA. E. (2018). Ripping off the band-aid: Scrutiny bundling in the wake of social disapproval. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 637–660.
54.
TufteE. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.
55.
TufteE. R. (2013). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed., 8th print). Graphics Press.
56.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
