This study aims to further our understanding of corporate communication on social media, with a particular focus on how organizations cultivate social presence—defined as being perceived as sociable and personal. Building on existing research, it examines the influence of national culture on organizational social presence strategies. Problematizing social presence theory’s individualistic orientation, this study explores how organizations enact social presence within a culture of relationalism. Employing a hybrid directed content analysis approach to examine a dataset of Chinese organizations’ public communication on social media, this study expands the established strategies of personalization, informal speech style, and invitational rhetoric by introducing two new strategies: familial presence and evoking collective identity. The study concludes by reflecting on the broader cultural implications and exploring the potential existence of alternative underlying logics of corporate communication across different cultural contexts.
AssarroudiA.Heshmati NabaviF.ArmatM. R.EbadiA.VaismoradiM. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42–55.
2.
BarcelosR. H.DantasD. C.SénécalS. (2018). Watch your tone: How a brand's tone of voice on social media influences consumer responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41(1), 60–80.
3.
BrewerM. B.ChenY. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
4.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93.
5.
ChenG. M.ChungJ. (1994). The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 93–105.
6.
ChenK. J.LinJ. S.ChoiJ. H.HahmJ. M. (2015). Would you be my friend? An examination of global marketers’ brand personification strategies in social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 15(2), 97–110.
7.
ChenZ. F.JiY. G.MenL. R. (2023). Effective social media communication for startups in China: Antecedents and outcomes of organization–public dialogic communication. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3613–3640.
8.
CornelissenJ. P.HaslamS. A.BalmerM. T. (2007). Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management, 18, 1–16.
Downe-WamboldtB. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321.
11.
EloS.KyngäsH. (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
12.
EvansA.TwomeyJ.TalanJ. (2011). Twitter as a public relations tool. Public Relations Journal, 5(1), 1–20.
13.
FeiX. (1941/1992). From the soil. University of California Press.
14.
FengY. L. (2004). 中国哲学简史 [A short history of Chinese philosophy]. New World Press.
15.
GretryA.HorváthC.BeleiN.van RielA. C. (2017). “Don’t pretend to be my friend!” When an informal brand communication style backfires on social media. Journal of Business Research, 74, 77–89.
16.
GrunigJ. E.GrunigL. A. (1992). Models of public relations and communication. In GrunigJ. E. (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 285–326). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
18.
GunawardenaC. N. (2017). Cultural perspectives on social presence. In WhitesideA. L.DikkersA. G.SwanK. (Eds.), Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research (pp. 113–129). Stylus.
19.
HayesJ. L.BrittB. C.ApplequistJ.RamirezA.JrHillJ. (2020). Leveraging textual paralanguage and consumer–brand relationships for more relatable online brand communication: A social presence approach. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(1), 17–30.
20.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
21.
HesterJ. B.DougallE. (2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811–824.
22.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.
23.
HuangM.KiE. J. (2023). Protecting organizational reputation during a para-crisis: The effectiveness of conversational human voice on social media and the roles of construal level, social presence, and organizational listening. Public Relations Review, 49(5), Article 102389.
24.
HuangY. H. (2003). A Chinese perspective of intercultural organization-public relationship. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12(4), 151–176.
25.
HungC. J. (2004). Cultural influence on relationship cultivation strategies: Multinational companies in China. Journal of Communication Management, 8(3), 264–281.
26.
HwangK.-K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30, 155–178. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00124.
27.
JeongH. J.ChungD. S.KimJ. (2022). Brands are human on social media: The effectiveness of human tone-of-voice on consumer engagement and purchase intentions through social presence. International Journal of Communication, 16, 4231–4253.
28.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
KeX. (2018). Succession and the transfer of social capital in Chinese family businesses. V&R unipress.
31.
KelleherT. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172–188.
32.
KelleherT.MillerB. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 395–414.
KentM. L. (2010). Directions in social media for professionals and scholars. In HeathR. (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (2nd ed., pp. 643–656). Sage.
35.
KentM. L.LiC. (2020). Toward a normative social media theory for public relations. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 1–10.
36.
KimM.-S. (2002). Non-western perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice. Sage Publications.
37.
KimN.LeeS. (2021). Cybersecurity breach and crisis response: An analysis of organizations’ official statements in the United States and South Korea. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(4), 560–581.
38.
KreuzbauerR.LinS.ChiuC.-Y. (2009). Relational versus group collectivism and optimal distinctiveness in a consumption context. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, Article 742.
39.
LiC. (2006). The Confucian ideal of harmony. Philosophy East and West, 56(4), 583–603.
40.
LiangQ. C. (2014). 新大陆游记 [Travel notes of the new continent]. The Commercial Press.
41.
LiebrechtC.TsaousiC.van HooijdonkC. (2021). Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: Manipulations and perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 132, 124–135.
42.
LovejoyK.SaxtonG. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353.
43.
MaL. A. (2013) Electronic word-of-mouth on microblogs: A cross-cultural content analysis of Twitter and Weibo. Intercultural Communication Studies, 22(3), 18–42.
44.
MaR. (2007). “The differential mode of Association”: Understanding of traditional Chinese social structure and the behaviors of the Chinese people. Journal of Peking University, 44(2), 131–142.
45.
MayringP. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Art. 20, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
46.
MenL. R.TsaiW. H. S. (2014). Perceptual, attitudinal, and behavioral outcomes of organization–public engagement on corporate social networking sites. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 417–435.
47.
MenL. R.TsaiW. H. S.ChenZ. F.JiY. G. (2018). Social presence and digital dialogic communication: Engagement lessons from top social CEOs. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 83–99.
48.
OhJ.KiE. J. (2019). Factors affecting social presence and word-of-mouth in corporate social responsibility communication: Tone of voice, message framing, and online medium type. Public Relations Review, 45(2), 319–331.
49.
ParkH.CameronG. T. (2014). Keeping it real: Exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 487–507.
50.
ParkH.LeeH. (2013). Show us you are real: The effect of human-versus-organizational presence on online relationship building through social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 265–271.
51.
ParveenF.JaafarN. I.AininS. (2015). Social media usage and organizational performance: Reflections of Malaysian social media managers. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 67–78.
52.
PrattM. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 481–509.
53.
RafaeliS. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In HawkinsR. P.PingreeS.WeimannJ. (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Sage annual review of communication research (Vol.16, pp.110–134). Sage.
SafferA. J.SommerfeldtE. J.TaylorM. (2013). The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 213–215.
56.
SavallH.ZardetV.BonnetM.PeronM. (2008). The emergence of implicit criteria actually utilized by reviewers of qualitative research articles: Case of a European journal. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 510–540.
57.
ShinW.PangA.KimH. J. (2015). Building relationships through integrated online media: Global organizations’ use of brand web sites, Facebook, and Twitter. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(2), 184–220.
58.
ShortJ. A.WilliamsE.ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
SungK. H.KimS. (2021). Do organizational personification and personality matter? The effect of interaction and conversational tone on relationship quality in social media. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(4), 582–606.
61.
TaiH. C. (1989). The oriental alternative: An hypothesis on culture and economy. In TaiH. C. (Ed.), Confucianism and economic development: An oriental alternative? (pp. 6–37). Washington Institute Press.
62.
TangF.WangX.NormanC. S. (2013). An investigation of the impact of media capabilities and extraversion on social presence and user satisfaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(10), 1060–1073.
63.
TarasV.SaralaR.MuchinskyP.KemmelmeierM.SingelisT. M.AvsecA.CoonH. M.DinnelD. L.GardnerW.GraceS.ProbstT. M. (2014). Opposite ends of the same stick? Multi-method test of the dimensionality of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 213–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113509132.
64.
Van NoortG.WillemsenL. M.KerkhofP.VerhoevenJ. W. M. (2015). Webcare as an integrative tool for customer care, reputation management, and online marketing: A literature review. In KitchenP. J.UzunoğluE. (Eds.), Integrated communications in the postmodern era (pp.77–99). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388551_4
65.
YangK. S. (1992). Chinese social orientation: From the social interaction perspective. In YangK. S.YuA. B. (Eds.), Chinese psychology and behavior (pp. 7–142). Taipei.
66.
YeS.LeiS. I.ShenH.XiaoH. (2020). Social presence, telepresence and customers’ intention to purchase online peer-to-peer accommodation: A mediating model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 42, 119–129.
67.
YumJ. O (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in Ease Asia. Communication Monographs, 55(4), 374–388.
68.
ZaharnaR. S. (2016). Beyond the individualism–collectivism divide to relationalism: Explicating cultural assumptions in the concept of “relationships”. Communication Theory, 26(2), 190–211.
69.
ZhangS.GosseltJ. F.de JongM. D. (2020). How large information technology companies use Twitter: Arrangement of corporate accounts and characteristics of tweets. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(4), 364–339.
