Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The study explored tensions that voicers experience when involving their peers in constructive voicing endeavors. Based on in-depth interview data from 23 workers, three tensions were identified: being perceived as strategic versus manipulative, leveraging peers’ strengths to refine ideas versus safeguarding against idea stealing, and amplifying ideas versus maintaining public neutrality. Additionally, participants discussed the strategic ways they responded to these tensions. The study advances constructive voice scholarship by illustrating the complex process marked by tensions that characterize involving peers in voicing endeavors. Further, findings contribute to organizational tensions and paradoxes scholarship by (a) highlighting how responding to tensions can produce additional tensions among voicers, further complicating the process of tension management and (b) demonstrating that effective tension management requires adaptability and collaborative effort. Based on the findings, the study offers practical insights for voicers, peers, and managers.

Keywords

constructive voicing peers tensions response strategies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adungosi

Odollo

(2020). An empirical analysis of innovative strategies and the growth of solar energy companies in Nairobi County, Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 12(30), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/12-30-11

Ashcraft

K. L.

Trethewey

(2004). Special issue synthesis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14795752.2004.10058565

Bain

Kreps

T. A.

Meikle

N. L.

Tenney

E. R.

(2021). Amplifying voice in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1288–1312. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.062

Bartunek

J. M.

(1988). The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In Quinn

Cameron

(Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp.137–162). Cambridge.

Biernacki

Waldorf

(1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205

Burris

E. R.

Detert

J. R.

Romney

A. C.

(2013). Speaking up vs. being heard: The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organization Science, 24(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0732

Butu

Nsafon

Park

S. W.

Huh

J. S.

(2021). Leveraging community-based organizations and fintech to improve small-scale renewable energy financing in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101949

Buzzanell

Liu

(2007). It’s `give and take’. Human Relations, 60(3), 463–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707076688

Chamberlin

Newton

LePine

(2017). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70, 11–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12185

10.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

11.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

12.

Curcuruto

Strauss

Axtell

Griffin

(2020). Voicing for safety in the workplace: A proactive goal- regulation perspective. Safety Science, 131, Article 104902 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104902

13.

Dameron

Torset

(2014). The discursive construction of strategists’ subjectivities: Towards a paradox lens on strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12072

14.

Doerfel

M. L.

Taylor

(2004). Network dynamics of interorganizational cooperation: The Croatian civil society movement. Communication Monographs, 71(4), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000307470

15.

Edmondson

(2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386

16.

Fairhurst

G. T.

Cooren

Cahill

D. J.

(2002). Discursiveness, contradiction, and unintended consequences in successive downsizings. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 501–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902154001

17.

Fairhurst

G. T.

Putnam

(2024a). Performing organizational paradoxes (pp. 67–87). Routledge.

18.

Fairhurst

G. T.

Putnam

(2024b). Analysis of tensions and paradoxes in qualitative organizational communication. In Brummans

Taylor

Sivunen

. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication (pp. 551–568). Sage.

19.

Fairhurst

G. T.

Smith

W. K.

Banghart

S. G.

Lewis

M. W.

Putnam

L. L.

Raisch

Schad

(2016). Diverging and converging: Integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162423

20.

Farjoun

(2017). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes. In Tsoukas

Langley

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies (pp. 87–109). Sage.

21.

Garner

J. T.

(2013). Dissenters, managers, and coworkers: The process of co-constructing organizational dissent and dissent effectiveness. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913488946

22.

Gibbs

J. L.

(2009). Dialectics in a global software team: Negotiating tensions across time, space, and culture. Human Relations, 62(6), 905–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709104547

23.

Gibbs

J. L.

Rozaidi

N. A.

Eisenberg

(2013). Overcoming the “Ideology of Openness”: Probing the affordances of social media for organizational knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12034

24.

Gibbs

J. L.

(2017). Managing tensions in virtual work arrangements. In Ballard

D. I.

McGlone

M. S.

(Eds.), Work pressures: New agendas in communication (pp. 78–91). Routledge.

25.

Jay

(2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772

26.

Kassing

J. W.

(2002). Speaking up: Identifying employees’ upward dissent strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237234

27.

Keller

Wong

S.-S.

Liou

(2020). How social networks facilitate collective responses to organizational paradoxes. Human Relations, 73(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719827846

28.

Kim

Leach

(2020). The role of digitally-enabled employee voice in fostering positive change and affective commitment in centralized organizations. Communication Monographs, 87(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.174585

29.

Kiura

M. W.

(2022). Toward reconceptualizing constructive employee voice: Understanding the process of voicing in the renewable energy industry in Kenya [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University].

30.

Kiura

Kim

(2025). A communicative model of voicing: The processes and strategies of constructive employee voicing in the renewable energy industry in Kenya. Management Communication Quarterly, Advance online Publication January 16, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189251315420

31.

Kiura

Leach

R. B.

(2024). Why employees speak up: Unveiling motives for constructive voice. Journal of Communication Management, 28(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-11-2023-0124

32.

Kram

K. E.

Isabella

L. A.

(1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.5465/256064

33.

Kuhn

Ashcraft

K. L.

Cooren

(2017). The work of communication: Relational perspectives on working and organizing in contemporary capitalism. Routledge.

34.

Lewis

M. W.

(2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760-776. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707712

35.

Liang

Farh

(2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 7–-92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176

36.

Love

M. S.

Dustin

S. L.

(2014). An investigation of coworker relationships and psychological collectivism on employee propensity to take charge. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(9), 1208–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.826712

37.

Mease

J. J.

(2019). Applied tensional analysis: Engaging practitioners and the constitutive shift. Management Learning, 50(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619849604

38.

Miller

K. I.

Considine

Garner

(2007). “Let me tell you about my job”: Exploring the terrain of emotion in the workplace. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(3), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318906293589

39.

Miron-Spektor

Ingram

Keller

Smith

W. K.

Lewis

M. W.

(2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0594

40.

Morrison

E. W.

(2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328

41.

Morrison

E. W.

(2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654

42.

Nderitu

S. M.

Lambaino

(2021). Effect of green supply chain management practices on the performance of solar energy companies in Kenya. International Research Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 2(2), 461–475. Retrieved from https://www.irjp.org/index.php/irjbsm/article/view/54

43.

T.W.

Hsu

D. Y.

Parker

S.K.

(2021). Received respect and constructive voice: The roles of proactive motivation and perspective taking. Journal of Management, 47(2), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319834660

44.

Oliffe

J. L.

Kelly

M. T.

Gonzalez Montaner

Yu Ko

W. F

. (2021). Zoom interviews: Benefits and concessions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211053522

45.

Peroune

D. L.

(2007). Tacit knowledge in the workplace: The facilitating role of peer relationships. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(4), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590710746414

46.

Pfrombeck

Levin

Rucker

D. D.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2022). The hierarchy of voice framework: The dynamic relationship between employee voice and social hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 42, Article 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2022.100179

47.

Piderit

S. K.

Ashford

S. J.

(2003). Breaking silence: Tactical choices women managers make in speaking up about gender-equity issues. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1477–1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00388

48.

Ploeger-Lyons

N. A.

Bisel

R. S.

(2023). Confronting idea stealers in the workplace: The unfortunate moral credentialing granted to power-holders. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(4), 1123-–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211047994

49.

Ploeger-Lyons

N. A.

Butler

J. A.

Modaff

D. P.

(2022). The roles of hierarchy and relational closeness in confrontations about idea stealing. Ohio Communication Journal, 60, 1–15. https://www.ohiocomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Ploeger-Lyons.pdf

50.

Pradies

Aust

Bednarek

Brandl

Carmine

Cheal

Pina

Cunha

Gaim

Keegan

Lê

J. K.

Miron-Spektor

Nielsen

R. K.

Pouthier

Sharma

Sparr

J. L.

Vince

Keller

(2021). The lived experience of paradox: How individuals navigate tensions during the pandemic crisis. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620986874

51.

Putnam

L. L.

Fairhurst

G. T.

Banghart

S. G.

(2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421

52.

Robinson

S. L.

Wang

Kiewitz

(2014). Coworkers behaving badly: The impact of coworker deviant behavior upon individual employees. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091225

53.

Romney

A. C.

(2016). Voice contagion: How employee voice spreads between coworkers [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Utah).

54.

Ryan

Coughlan

Cronin

(2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(6), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.6.42433

55.

Satterstrom

Kerrissey

DiBenigno

(2021). The voice cultivation process: How team members can help upward voice live on to implementation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 380–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220962795

56.

Satterstrom

Vogus

Jung

Kerrissey

(2024). Voice is not enough: A multilevel model of how frontline voice can reach implementation. Health Care Management Review, 49(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000389

57.

Sias

P. M.

Cahill

D. J.

(1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319809374611

58.

Smith

W. K.

Lewis

M. W.

(2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958

59.

Stohl

Cheney

(2001). Participatory practices/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 349–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318901143001

60.

Subhakaran

S. E.

Dyaram

(2018). Interpersonal antecedents to employee upward voice: Mediating role of psychological safety. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1510–1525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2017-0276

61.

Suortti

Sivunen

(2023). Communicative tensions in remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(2), 386–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189231199052

62.

Tracy

S. J.

(2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000210025

63.

Tracy

S. J.

(2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

64.

Trethewey

Ashcraft

K. L.

(2004). Special issue introduction: Practicing disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000210007

65.

Weiss

Morrison

E. W.

(2019). Speaking up and moving up: How voice can enhance employees’ social status. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2262

66.

Wendt

R. F.

(1998). The sound of one hand clapping: Counterintuitive lessons extracted from paradoxes and double binds in a participative organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(3), 323–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318998113001

67.

Whiting

S. W.

Maynes

T. D.

Podsakoff

N. P.

Podsakoff

P. M.

(2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024871

68.

Woo

(2019). Reconceptualizing interorganizational collaborations as tensile structures: Implications of conveners’ proactive tension management. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1526389

69.

Woo

Bertram

(2022). “I value collaboration but won’t get pushed around”: Uncovering tensions in millennials’ vocational anticipatory socialization. Western Journal of Communication, 86(3), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2022.2074088

70.

Woo

Putnam

L. L.

Riforgiate

S. E.

(2017). Identity work and tensions in organizational internships: A comparative analysis. Western Journal of Communication, 81(5), 560–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1312510

The Balancing Act When Engaging Peers in Constructive Voicing: Uncovering Voicing Tensions and Response Strategies

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References