This paper investigates the complex dynamics of Asian business communication through four empirical case studies. A mixed-methods approach combines qualitative and quantitative analyses. Cases 1 and 2 assess direct communication between Chinese and Japanese participants. Case 3 examines mutual link-pin communication in an American multinational corporation. Case 4 explores how Mainland Chinese expatriates navigate Western business environments, highlighting the role of language link pins in intercultural exchanges. The findings highlight (1) the importance of second-language competence in the intercultural context, (2) the necessity of recognizing contextual influences where high-and low-context languages converge, suggesting that high-context and low-context communication “exist along a continuum rather than as mutually exclusive categories,” and (3) the importance of link-pin communication in intercultural organizational settings. The findings contribute to existing literature on business communication and offer practical insights for professionals navigating the multifaceted landscape of Asian business environments.
AritzJ.WalkerR. C. (2010). Cognitive organization and identity maintenance in multicultural teams: A discourse analysis of decision-making meetings. The Journal of Business Communication, 47(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943609340669 (Original work published 2009).
2.
BabcockR.Du-BabcockB. (2001). Language-based communication zones in international business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 372–412.
3.
BabcockB.Du-BabcockB. (2006). Effects of link-pin channels in international business communication. China Media Research, 2(1), 43–54.
4.
BabcockR.Du-BabcockB. (2009). Strategic versus non-strategic organization development in overseas Chinese family firms: A comparison of traditional and progressive firms. In YaegerT. F.SorensenP. F. (Eds.). Strategic organization development: Managing change for success (pp. 279–304). Information Age Publishing.
5.
Du-BabcockB. (1999). Topic management and turn-taking in professional communication: First- versus second-language strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(4), 544–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318999124003
6.
Du-BabcockB. (2005). An analysis of communication behaviors between intra-and inter-cultural decision-making meetings. In Bargiela-ChiappiniF.GottiM. (Eds.), Asian business discourse(s) (pp. 147–168). Peter Lang AG.
7.
Du-BabcockB. (2006). An analysis of topic management strategies and turn-taking behavior in the Hong Kong bilingual environment: The impact of culture and language use. Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 21–42.
8.
Du-BabcockB. (2007). Language-based communication zones and professional genre competence in business and organizational communication: A cross-cultural case approach. Journal of Asian-Pacific Communication, 17(1), 149–171.
9.
Du-BabcockB. (2014). Business communication: A revisiting of theory, research, and teaching. In BhatiaV.BremnerS. (Eds), The Routledge handbook of professional communication (1st ed., pp. 68–87). Routledge.
Du-BabcockB.BabcockR. (2007). Genre patterns in language-based communication zones. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 340–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943607306136
12.
Du-BabcockB.BabcockR. (2024). The art of intercultural business communication: A competency-based approach. Routledge.
13.
Du-BabcockB.TanakaT. (2013). A comparison of the communication behaviors of Hong Kong Chinese and Japanese business professionals in intracultural and intercultural decision-making meetings. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651913479918
14.
Du-BabcockB.FengH.Y. (2015). Language in education policy and its impact on out-of-class language use and preferred communication media: A Hong Kong Case of university education. In TochonF. V. (Ed.), Language education policy unlimited: Global perspectives and local practices (pp. 181–218). Deep University Press.
15.
FleischmannC.FolterL.AritzJ. (2020). The impact of perceived foreign language proficiency on hybrid team culture. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(4), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417710440 (Original work published2017).
16.
FujioM.TanakaH. (2012). Harmonious disagreement in Japanese business discourse. In AritzJ.WalkerR. (Eds.), Discourse perspectives on organizational communication (pp. 81–100). Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
HofstedeG. (1991). Cultures and organization: Software of the mind-intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. McGraw-Hill Book.
19.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.
20.
LikertR. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. McGraw-Hill.
21.
MarcelM. (2022). Communication apprehension across the career span. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(4), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419856803 (Original work published 2019)
22.
RussT. L. (2012). The relationship between communication apprehension and learning preferences in an organizational setting. The Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612456035
23.
TriandisH. (2012). Culture and conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 145–152.
24.
UlijnJ.O’HairD.WeggemanM.LedlowG.HallH. T. (2000). Innovation, corporate strategy, and cultural context: What is the mission for international business communication?The Journal of Business Communication, 37, 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360003700305
25.
UsunierJ. C.RoulinN. (2010). The influence of high and low-context communication styles on the design, content, and language of business-to-business web sites. Journal of Business Communication, 47(2), 189–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610364526
26.
WhorfB. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
27.
YaoY.Du-BabcockB. (2023). English as a Lingua Franca in Mainland China: An analysis of intercultural business communicative competence. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419898221 (Original work published 2020)
