Perceptions of trustworthiness are an established antecedent of interpersonal trust. However, the trust and communication literatures provide fewer insights into possible proactive tools for positively influencing trustworthiness. Interpersonal communication dominance is a skill used to influence another individual in an interpersonal relationship. Using social information processing theory, we hypothesize and test a parallel mediation model specifying that the three dimensions of trustworthiness (i.e., perceived ability, perceived benevolence, and perceived integrity) mediate the relationship between interpersonal communication dominance and interpersonal trust. The results show significant indirect effects for interpersonal communication dominance on interpersonal trust through perceived benevolence and perceived integrity but not through perceived ability. Our findings suggest that using interpersonal communication dominance to increase perceptions of benevolence and integrity may be an important communicative tool for positively influencing interpersonal trust.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295–298.
3.
BecerraM.GuptaA. K. (2003). Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.32.12815
4.
BhaveD. P.KramerA.GlombT. M. (2010). Work–family conflict in work groups: Social information processing, support, and demographic dissimilarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017885
5.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction.
6.
BlickleG.SchütteN. (2017). Trait psychopathy, task performance, and counterproductive work behavior directed toward the organization. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.006
7.
BrassD. J.BurkhardtM. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 441–470. https://doi.org/10.5465/256588
8.
BreuerC.HüffmeierJ.HibbenF.HertelG. (2020). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3–34.
9.
BurgoonJ. K.DunbarN. E. (2000). An interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67, 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376497
10.
BurgoonJ. K.JohnsonM. L.KochP. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communication Monographs, 65, 308–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376456
11.
BurkhardtM. E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 869–898. https://doi.org/10.5465/256603
12.
ChenZ.TakeuchiR.ShumC. (2013). A social information processing perspective of coworker influence on a focal employee. Organization Science, 24(6), 1618–1639. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0820
13.
ColquittJ. A.RodellJ. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.0572
14.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
15.
CreedonP. J.HayesA. F. (2015). Small sample mediation analysis: How far can you push the bootstrap? [Paper presentation]. Annual Conference of the Association for Psychological Science, New York, NY.
16.
DeutschM. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265–279.
17.
DirksK. T.SkarlickiD. P. (2009). The relationship between being perceived as trustworthy by coworkers and individual performance. Journal of Management, 35(1), 136–157.
18.
DunbarN. E.BippusA. M.YoungS. L. (2008). Interpersonal dominance in relational conflict: A view from dyadic power theory. Interpersona an International Journal on Personal Relationships, 2, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v2i1.16
19.
DunbarN. E.BurgoonJ. K. (2005). Measuring nonverbal dominance. In ManusovV. (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 361–374). Earlbaum.
20.
DunbarN. E.JensenM. L.BessarabovaE.BurgoonJ. K.BernardD. R.HarrisonK. J.EcksteinJ. M. (2014). Empowered by persuasive deception: The effects of power and deception on dominance, credibility, and decision making. Communication Research, 41, 852–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447099
21.
EdwardsJ. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144–192.
22.
FerrisG. R.TreadwayD. C.KolodinskyR. W.HochwarterW. A.KacmarC. J.DouglasC.FrinkD. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126–152.
23.
FerrisG. R.TreadwayD. C.PerrewéP. L.BrouerR. L.DouglasC.LuxS. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3), 290–320.
24.
FrenchJ. R. P.JrRavenB. H.Jr. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Institute for Social Research.
25.
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38, 1167–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312439327
26.
GabarroJ. J. (1978). The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In AthosA. G.GabarroJ. J. (Eds.), Interpersonal behaviors: Communication and understanding in relationships (pp. 290–303). Prentice Hall.
27.
GómezL. F. (2018). Just paying attention: Communication for organizational attention. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(4), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415600862
28.
GrothM.GoldmanB. M.GillilandS. W.BiesR. J. (2002). Commitment to legal claiming: Influences of attributions, social guidance and organizational tenure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.781
29.
GroysbergB.AbrahamsR. (2006). Lift outs: How to acquire a high-functioning team. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 133–164.
30.
HaleblianJ.FinkelsteinS. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/256761
31.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Publications.
32.
HeynsM.RothmannS. (2015). Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), 01–12.
33.
JonesD. A.SkarlickiD. P. (2005). The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority’s fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.363
34.
JonesS. L.ShahP. P. (2016). Diagnosing the locus of trust: A temporal perspective for trustor, trustee, and dyadic influences on perceived trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000041
35.
KodishS. (2017). Communicating organizational trust: An exploration of the link between discourse and action. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(4), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525464
36.
LauD. C.LidenR. C. (2008). Antecedents of coworker trust: Leaders’ blessings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1130–1138.
37.
LawK. S.WongC. S. (1999). Multidimensional constructs M structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs. Journal of Management, 25(2), 143–160.
38.
LawK. S.WongC. S.MobleyW. M. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 741–755.
39.
LewickiR. J. (2018). Preface. In SearleR. H.NienaberA. I.SitkinS. B. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to trust (pp. xxv–xxvii). Routledge.
40.
LewisJ. D.WeigertA. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985.
41.
LingB.GuoY. (2020). Affective and cognitive trust as mediators in the influence of leader motivating language on personal initiative. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420915503
42.
MalhotraN. K.KimS. S.PatilA. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883.
43.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136.
44.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
45.
MayerR. C.GavinM. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874–888.
46.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.
47.
McWorthyL.HenningsenD. D. (2014). Looking at favorable and unfavorable superior-subordinate relationships through dominance and affiliation lenses. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525195
48.
MechanicD. (1962). Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 349–364.
49.
MoskowitzD. S. (1994). Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 921.
50.
ParkerS. K.WilliamsH. M.TurnerN. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.
51.
PfefferJ. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business Press.
52.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Assessing mediation in communication research. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research.
53.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
54.
RusmanE.van BruggenJ.SloepP.KoperR. (2010). Fostering trust in virtual project teams: Towards a design framework grounded in a TrustWorthiness ANtecedents (TWAN) schema. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(11), 834–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.07.003
55.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
56.
SchilkeO.HuangL. (2018). Worthy of swift trust? How brief interpersonal contact affects trust accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(11), 1181–1197.
57.
SchütteN.BlickleG.FriederR. E.WihlerA.SchnitzlerF.HeupelJ.ZettlerI. (2018). The role of interpersonal influence in counterbalancing psychopathic personality trait facets at work. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1338–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315607967
58.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9, 2, 221–232.
59.
SturmR. E.AntonakisJ. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314555769
ThomasG. F.ZolinR.HartmanJ. L. (2009). The central role of communication in developing trust and its effect on employee involvement. Journal of Business Communication, 46(3), 287–310.
62.
TomlinsonE. C.SchnackenbergA. K.DawleyD.AshS. R. (2020). Revisiting the trustworthiness–trust relationship: Exploring the differential predictors of cognition- and affect-based trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41, 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2448
63.
TostL. P.GinoF.LarrickR. P. (2013). When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1465–1486.
64.
WaltherJ. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90.
65.
WheelerA. R.ShanineK. K.LeonM. R.WhitmanM. V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1–26.
66.
WiltermuthS.TiedensL. Z.NealeM. (2015). The benefits of dominance complementarity in negotiations. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(3), 194–209.
