This study examined links between employee interaction with their organization’s official Facebook page, social capital, and employee identification with the organization. Results indicate employee interaction with their company’s Facebook page was positively related to organizational identification and bridging and bonding social capital. Moreover, the relationship between interaction with the company Facebook page and identification was partially mediated by bridging social capital outcomes. Overall, results suggest the company Facebook page is an important communicative bridge between the employee and the larger organization, enhancing the employee-organization relationship. Results contribute to our understanding of social media and organizational identification, as well as our understanding of social capital associated with social media use in organizational settings.
AppelL.DadlaniP.DwyerM.HamptonK.KitzieV.MatniZ. A.. . . TeodoroR. (2014). Testing the validity of social capital measures in the study of information and communication technologies, Information, Communication & Society, 17, 398-416.
2.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
boydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
4.
BurkeK. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
ChaputM.BrummansB. H. J. M.CoorenF. (2011). The role of organizational identification in the communicative constitution of an organization: A study of consubstantialization in a young political party. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 252-282. doi:10.1177/0893318910386719
6.
CheneyG. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 143-158. doi:10.1080/00335638309383643
7.
CheneyG.ChristensenL. T.DaileyS. L. (2014). Communicating identity and identification in and around organizations. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 695-716). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CvijikjI. P.MichahellesF. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3, 843-861. doi:10.1007/s13278-013-0098-8
9.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M.HarquailC. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
10.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
11.
FayM. J.KlineS. L. (2012). The influence of informal communication on organizational identification and commitment in the context of high-intensity telecommuting. Southern Communication Journal, 77, 61-76. doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2011.582921
12.
FoxC. L.BoultonM. J. (2006). Friendship as a moderator of the relationship between social skills and peer vicitimisation. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 110-121. doi: 10.1002/ab.20114
13.
HaighM. M.BrubakerP.WhitesideE. (2013). Facebook: Examining the information presented and its impact on stakeholders, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 52-69.
14.
HamptonK. N. (2011). Comparing bonding and bridging ties for democratic engagement: Everyday use of communication technologies within social networks for civic and civil behaviors. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 510-528.
15.
HannahM. A.LamC. (2017). Drawing from available means: Assessing the rhetorical dimensions of Facebook practice. International Journal of Business Communication, 54, 235-257. doi:10.1177%2F2329488415572788
16.
HayesA. F. (2016). PROCESS procedure for SPSS. Retrieved from www.afhayes.com
17.
HazletonV.KennanW. (2000). Social capital: Reconceptualizing the bottom line. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 5, 81-87. doi:10.1108/13563280010372513
18.
HeH.BrownA. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38, 3-35. doi:10.1177/1059601112473815
19.
HuangL. V.LiuP. L. (2017). Ties that work: Investigating the relationships among coworker connections, work-related Facebook utility, online social capital, and employee outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 512-524.
20.
JiY. G.LiC.NorthM.LiuJ. (2017). Staking reputation on stakeholders: How does stakeholders’ Facebook engagement help or ruin a company’s reputation?Public Relations Review, 43, 201-210. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.12.004
21.
KimH.LeeM.LeeH.KimN. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 557-569. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2
22.
LeeS.ChungJ. E. W.ParkM. (2016). Network environments and well-being: An examination of personal network structure, social capital, and perceived social support. Health Communication. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1242032
23.
MaelF.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
24.
MorianoJ. A.MoleroF.TopaG.ManginJ. L. (2014). The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 103-119. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0196-x
25.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673-690.
26.
OddenC. M.SiasP. M. (1997). Peer communication relationships, psychological climate, and gender. Communication Quarterly, 45, 153-166.
27.
O’ReillyC. A.ChatmanJ. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
30.
QuinnK. (2017). Contextual social capital: Linking the contexts of social media use to its outcomes. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 582-600. doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1139613.
31.
RikettaM. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358-384. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
32.
RyuS. (2015). To bond or to bridge? Contingent effects of managers’ social capital on organizational performance. American Review of Public Administration, 45, 1-22.
33.
ScottC. R.CormanS. R.CheneyG. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00223.x
34.
SheerV. C.RiceR. E. (2017). Mobile instant messaging use and social capita: Direct and indirect associations with employee outcomes. Information & Management, 54, 90-102.
35.
SiasP. M. (2017). Company Facebook and organizational identification. Communication Research Reports, 34, 335-343. doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1350574
36.
SiasP. M.CahillD. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62, 273-299.
TompkinsP. K.CheneyG. (1985). Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organization. In McPheeR. D.TompkinsP. K. (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new dimensions (pp. 179-210). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
van DickR.van KnippenbergD.KerschreiterR.HertelG.WiesekeJ. (2008). Interactive effects of work group and organizational identification on job satisfaction and extra-role behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 388-399. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.009
42.
VaughnM. A. (2009). Organizational identification strategies and values in high technology industries: A rhetorical-organizational approach to the analysis of socialization processes in corporate discourse. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2, 119-139. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902_03
43.
WalumbwaF. O.AvolioB. J.ZhuW. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61, 793-825. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00131.x
44.
WatersR. D.BurnettE.LammA.LucasJ. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35, 102-106. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006
45.
WeberM. S.FulkJ.MongeP. (2016). The emergence and evolution of social networking sites as an organizational form. Management Communication Quarterly, 30, 305-332. doi:10.1177/0893318916629547
46.
WeisekeJ.AhearneM.LamS. K.von DickR. (2008). The role of leaders in internal marketing: A multilevel examination through the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Marketing, 73, 123-146.
47.
WiesenfeldB. M.RaghuramS.GarudG. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27, 212-229.
48.
WilliamsD. (2006). On and off the ‘net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 593-628. doi:10.1111/j.1083-01.2006.00029
