Employees in multinational organizations (MNOs) face differences in accounts provided by other members, yet an inappropriate account could damage the account-giver’s career. This study examines account-giving in the eyes of the manager in an MNO context. A thematic analysis was conducted on the expected account-giving from 23 Japanese and 20 American managers in the United States. The results show that American managers typically view the out-of-control account as appropriate, whereas Japanese managers expect an apology in an untoward situation. In addition, this study gives insights to the apology account expected by Japanese managers. They expect an explicit apology for the lack of immediate communication rather than for the failing project. More interestingly, many Japanese managers expect an implicit form of apologies through self-reflection. Other findings including cultural amalgamation in MNOs and practical implications for MNO members are discussed along with the implications for the existing account taxonomy.
BakarH. A.DilbeckK. E.McCroskeyJ. C. (2010). Mediating role of supervisory communication practices on relations between leader member exchange and perceived employee commitment to workgroup. Communication Monographs, 77, 637-656. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.499104
2.
BarnlundD. C.YoshiokaM. (1990). Apologies: Japanese and Americans. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 193-206. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(90)90005-H
3.
BiselR. S.MessersmithA. S. (2012). Organizational and supervisory apology effectiveness: Apology giving in work settings. Business Communication Quarterly, 75, 425-448. doi:10.1177/1080569912461171
4.
BresnahanJ. B.ShearmanS. M.LeeS. Y.ParkC. Y.MosherD.OhashiR. (2002). Responding to a friend: Social appropriateness and liking in Japan, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 31, 127-145.
5.
BurgoonJ. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129-142.
6.
BurgoonJ. K.HubbardA. S. E. (2005). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory and interaction adaptation theory. In GudykunstW. B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication theory (pp. 149-172). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
ByttnyR. (1987). Sequence and practical reasoning in accounts episodes. Communication Quarterly, 35, 67-83.
8.
CheserR. N. (1998). The effect of Japanese kaizen on employee motivation in U.S. manufacturing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6, 197-217.
9.
CheungF. Y.WuW. P.WongM. L. (2013). Supervisor–subordinate kankei, job satisfaction and work outcomes in Japanese firms. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 13, 265-278. doi:10.1177/1470595813501477
10.
ChoiT. Y.LikerJ. F. (1995). Bringing Japanese continuous improvement approaches to U.S. manufacturing: The roles of process orientation and communications. Decision Sciences, 26, 589-620.
11.
ClarkR. (1979). The Japanese company. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
ColeR. E. (1971). Japanese blue collar: The changing tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
CrossmanJ.NomaH. (2013). Sunao as character: Its implications for trust and intercultural communication within subsidiaries of Japanese multinationals in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 543-555. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1321-7
14.
CupachW. R.ImahoriT. T. (1993). Managing social predicaments created by others: A comparison of Japanese and American facework. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 431-444.
15.
DansereauE.MarkhamS. E. (1987). Superior-subordinate communication: Multiple levels of analysis. In JablinE. M.PutnamL. L.RobertsK. H.PorterL. W. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 343-388). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
FosteE. I.BoteroI. C. (2012). Personal reputation: Effects of upward communication on impressions about new employees. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 48-73. doi:10.1177/0893318911411039
17.
FurusawaM.BrewsterC. (2016). IHRM and expatriation in Japanese MNCs: HRM practices and their impact on adjustment and job performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 54, 396-420. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12106
18.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level, multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
19.
HallE. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.
20.
HamiltonV. L.HagiwaraS. (1992). Roles, responsibility, and accounts across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 157-179.
21.
HamiltonV. L.SandersJ.HosoiY.IshimuraZ.MatsubaraN.NishimuraH.. . .TokoroK. (1983). Universals in judging wrongdoing: Japanese and Americans compared. American Sociological Review, 49, 199-211.
22.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
ItoiR.OhbuchiK.FukunoM. (1996). A cross-cultural study of preference of accounts: Relationship closeness, harm severity, and motives of account making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 913-934.
24.
KimY. S. (2007). Communication experiences of Korean expatriates in the U.S.: A study of cross-cultural adaptation. Human Communication, 10, 213-230.
25.
KimY. S. (2008). Communication experiences of American expatriates in South Korea: A study of cross-cultural adaptation. Human Communication, 11, 511-528.
26.
KongK. C. (2006). Accounts as a politeness strategy in the internal directive documents of a business firm in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 16, 77-101.
27.
LeeH. E.ParkH. S.ImaiT.DolanD. (2012). Cultural differences between Japan and the United States in uses of “apology” and “thank you” in favor asking messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 263-289. doi:10.1177/0261927X12446595
28.
MacphersonW. G.LockhartJ. C.KavanH.IaquintoA. L. (2015). Kaizen: A Japanese philosophy and system for business excellence. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(5), 3-9. doi:10.1108/JBS-07-2014-0083
29.
MadduxW. W.KimP. H.OkumuraT.BrettJ. M. (2011). Cultural differences in the function and meaning of apologies. International Negotiation, 16, 405-425. doi:10.1163/157180611X592932
30.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5, 361-368.
31.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (2000). Applying reciprocity and accomodation theories to supervisor/subordinate communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 278-289. doi: 10.1080/00909880009365575
32.
McLaughlinM. L.CodyM. J.O’HairH. D. (1983). The management of failure events: Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior. Human Communication Research, 9, 208-224.
33.
OnishiJ. (2006). The transferability of Japanese HRM practices to Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44, 260-275.
34.
OwenW. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287. doi: 10.1080/00335638409383697
35.
SandellN.SvenssonP. (2016). The language of failure: The use of accounts in financial reports. International Journal of Business Communication, 53, 5-26. doi:10.1177/2329488414525452
36.
SchlenkerB. R.PontariB. A.ChristopherA. N. (2001). Excuses and character: Personal and social implications of excuses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 15-32.
37.
SchönbachP. (1980). A category system for account phases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 195-200.
38.
ScottM. B.LymanS. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
39.
SheerV. C.ChenL. (2004). Improving media richness theory: A study of interaction goals, message valence, and task complexity in manager-subordinate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 76-93. doi:10.1177/0893318904265803
40.
ShimadaT.ThamelingC. L.TakaiJ. (2015). Everyday experiences of account-giving from victims’ and offenders’ perspectives: A comparison of U.S. American and Japanese students’ perceptions. Intercultural Communication Studies, 24, 82-102.
41.
SitkinS. B.BiesR. J. (1993). Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflicts. Human Relations, 46, 349-370.
42.
SuedaK.WisemanR. L. (1992). Embarrassment remediation in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 159-173.
43.
SugimotoN. (1997). A Japan-U.S. comparison of apology styles. Communication Research, 24, 349-369.
44.
SweeneyE.HuaZ. (2010). Accommodating toward your audience: Do native speakers of English know how to accommodate their communication strategies toward nonnative speakers of English?Journal of Business Communication, 47, 477-504. doi:10.1177/0021943610377308
45.
TakakuS. (2000). Culture and status as influences on account giving: A comparison between the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 371-388.
46.
TataJ. (2000). She said, he said: The influence of remedial accounts on third-party judgments of coworker sexual harassment. Journal of Management, 26, 1133-1156.
47.
TesserA.RosenS. (1972). Similarity of objective fate as a determinant of the reluctance to transmit unpleasant information: The mum effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 46-53.
48.
ThomasD. C.ToyneB. (1995). Subordinates’ responses to cultural adaptation by Japanese expatriate managers. Journal of Business Research, 32, 1-10.
49.
Ting-ToomeyS. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In GudykunstW. B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Ting-ToomeyS.ChungL. C. (2012). Understanding intercultural communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
YamazakiY.KayesD. C. (2010). Learning and work satisfaction in Asia: A comparative study of Japanese, Chinese and Malaysian managers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2271-2289. doi:10.1080/09585192.2010.509628
52.
YanadoriY.KatoT. (2009). Work and family practices in Japanese firms: Their scope, nature and impact on employee turnover. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 439-456. doi:10.1080/09585190802673494
53.
YoshimuraN.AndersonP. (1997). Inside the kaisha: Demystifying Japanese business behavior. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
