Research on organizational mission and vision primarily has approached the concepts from managerial perspectives. This study employed a communicative constitution of organizations perspective to problematize the concepts of mission/vision alignment and assimilation and to focus on employee mission/vision ownership. The study sought to understand how employees construct ownership, that is, their ability to control, change, or contribute to mission and vision. A thematic analysis of 46 in-depth interviews with employees from 22 organizations revealed factors that impede employee ownership and those that facilitate it. The findings have important implications for understanding an employee’s role in the construction of organizational reality.
AhiauzuA.PenielA. S. (2012). Impact of clear and compelling vision on workers’ commitment in Nigerian organizations: An examination of workplace spirituality. Journal of Leadership, Accountability, and Ethics, 9, 113-124.
2.
Attride-StirlingJ. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385-405.
3.
BabnikK.BreznikK.DermolV.ŠircaN. T. (2014). The mission statement: Organizational culture perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114, 612-627.
4.
BartkusB.GlassmanM.McAfeeB. (2006). Mission statement quality and financial performance. European Management Journal, 24, 86-94.
5.
BoltonP.BrunnermeierM. K.VeldkampL. (2013). Leadership, coordination, and corporate culture. Review of Economic Studies, 80, 512-537.
6.
BorgogniL.RussoS. D.LathamG. P. (2011). The relationship of employee perceptions of the immediate supervisor and top management with collective efficacy. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18, 5-13.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
8.
BrummansB. H. J. M.CoorenF.RobichaudD.TaylorJ. R. (2014). Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 173-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
BurkeK. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkley: University of California Press.
10.
CampbellA.YeungS. (1991). Creating a sense of mission. Long Range Planning, 24(4), 10-20.
11.
ChaputM.BrummansB. H. J. M.CoorenF. (2011). The role of organizational identification in the communicative constitution of an organization: A study of consubstantialization in a young political party. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 252-282.
12.
ChristensenL. T.AskegaardS. (2001). Corporate identity and corporate image revisited. A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 292-315.
13.
CollinsJ. C.PorrasJ. I. (1998). Organizational vision and visionary organizations. In HickmanG. R. (Ed.), Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (pp. 234-249). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
ConradC.MalphursR. (2008). Are we there yet? Are we there yet?Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 123-146.
15.
CoorenF.MatteF.ChantalB.BrummansB. H. J. M. (2013). Communication as ventriloquism: A grounded-in-action approach to the study of organizational tensions. Communication Monographs, 80, 255-277.
16.
DesmidtS.HeeneA. (2005). Methodology in mission statement research: An assessment of the research field. In HoqueM. Z. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Business Research Conference (pp. 1-39). Sydney, Australia: World Business Institute.
17.
DixonJ.DoughertyD. S. (2013). A language convergence/meaning divergence analysis exploring how LGBTQ and single employees manage traditional family expectations in the workplace. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 1-19.
18.
DukeC. (2001). Networks and managerialism: Field-testing competing paradigms. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23, 103-118.
19.
DvirT.KassN.ShamirB. (2004). The emotional bond: Vision and organizational commitment among high-tech employees. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 126-143.
20.
FairhurstG. T. (1993). Echoes of the vision: When the rest of the organization talks total quality. Management Communication Quarterly, 6, 331-371.
21.
FairhurstG. T. (2011). The power of framing: Creating the language of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
FairhurstG. T.GrantD. (2010). The social construction of leadership: A sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 171-210.
23.
FairhurstG. T.JordanJ. M.NeuwirthK. (1997). Why are we here? Managing the meaning of an organizational mission statement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 243-263.
FritzJ. H.O’NeilN. B.PoppA. M.WilliamsC.ArnettR. C. (2013). The influence of supervisory behavioral integrity on intent to comply with organizational ethical standards and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 251-263.
26.
GilpinD. R.MillerN. K. (2013). Exploring complex organizational communities: Identity as emergent perceptions, boundaries, and relationships. Communication Theory, 23, 148-169.
27.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
KantabutraS.SaratunM. (2011). Identifying vision realization factors at a Thai state enterprise. Management Research Review, 34, 996-1017.
29.
KeytonJ. (2005). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
KirbyE. L.KroneK. J. (2002). “The policy exists but you can’t really use it”: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.
31.
KopanevaI. (2013). Employee constructions of organizational mission and vision (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Washington State University, Pullman.
32.
KopanevaI.SiasP. M. (2015). Lost in translation: Employee and organizational constructions of mission and vision. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(3), 358-384.
33.
KoschmannM. A. (2013). The communicative constitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 61-89.
34.
KuhnT. (2012). Negotiating the micro-macro divide: Thought leadership from organizational communication for theorizing organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 543-584.
35.
KuhnT.NelsonN. (2002). Reingeneering identity: A case study of multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 5-38.
36.
MargolisS. L. (2011, June). A big-picture view: Define the why, how and what of your organization to provide employees with a big-picture view. HR Magazine, pp. 129-130.
37.
MartinJ. (2001). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain (Foundations for organizational science). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MitraA. (2011). Feminist organizing in India: A study of women in NGOs. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34, 66-75.
40.
MorphewC. C.HartleyM. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 456-471.
41.
NanusB. (1992). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your Organization (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
NicoteraA. M.MahonM. M.ZhaoX. (2010). Conceptualization and measurement of structurational divergence in the healthcare setting. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 362-385.
43.
O’ConnellD.HickersonK.PillutlaA. (2011). Organizational visioning: An integrative review. Group and Organization Management, 36, 103-125.
44.
PandaA.GuptaR. K. (2003). Why mission statements become a show piece? Case of an Indo-American joint venture. VIKALPA, 28, 23-47.
45.
PowellS.DoddC. (2007). Managing vision and the brand within the creative industries. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12, 394-413.
46.
RupprechtE. A.WaldropJ. S.GrawitchM. J. (2013). Initial validation of a new measure of leadership. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65, 128-148.
47.
SchoenebornD.BlaschkeS.CoorenF.McPheeR. D.SeidlD.TaylorJ. R. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 285-316.
48.
ScottC. R.CormanS. R.CheneyG. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336.
49.
SengeP. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
50.
SlackF. J.OrifeJ. N.AndersonF. P. (2010). Effects of commitment to corporate vision on employee satisfaction with their organization: An empirical study in the United States. International Journal of Management, 27, 421-436.
51.
StershicS. F. (1993, February1). Mission statements can be a “field of dreams.”Marketing News, 1, 11-12.
52.
StohlC.CheneyG. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
53.
TaylorJ. R. (2005). Engaging organization through worldview. In MayS.MumbyD. (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 197-221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2011). The situated organization: Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. New York, NY: Rutledge.
56.
TourishD. (2013). The dark side of transformational leadership: A critical perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
TracyS. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
58.
Van den SteenE. (2005). Organizational beliefs and managerial vision. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 21, 256-283.
59.
ZwingmannI.WeggeJ.WolfS.RudolfM.SchmidtM.RichterP. (2014). Is transformational leadership healthy for employees? A multilevel analysis in 16 nations. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 22(1/2), 24-51.
