Studies of constitution, particularly the Communication as Constitutive of Organization (CCO) perspective, currently lacks adequate consideration of how power manifests in ongoing, dynamic, material–symbolic co-constitution. This article aims to locate and understand power in the sociomaterial realities of work. I position democratic work practices as transcendent of symbolic-material dualisms and investigate those practices via a co-constitutive, integrated approach. This critical-interpretive analysis of boundary work illuminates the non-neutral constitutive properties of sociomateriality in action. Findings coalesce around three themes: (a) material objects and notions of success, (b) sites of participation, and (c) bodies and engaged citizenry. The materialities of homelessness, along with those of “non-homelessness,” co-constitute conditions that actively work to maintain homelessness’ existence and restrict the democratic possibilities of work. To understand the complex connections of materiality and symbols in constitutive entanglements, I propose communicative instantiation as a conceptual-practical site for investigations of constitution.
AshcraftK. L.KuhnT. R.CoorenF. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 1-64. doi:10.1080/19416520903047186
2.
AshcraftK. L.MumbyD. K. (2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
BarleyW. C.LeonardiP. M.BaileyD. E. (2012). Engineering objects for collaboration: Strategies of ambiguity and clarity at knowledge boundaries. Human Communication Research, 38, 280-308. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01430.x
4.
BeanH.LemonL.O’ConnellA. (2013). Organizational rhetoric, materiality, and the shape of organizational democracy. Southern Communication Journal, 78, 256-273. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2013.791717
5.
BordoS. (1988). Anorexia nervosa: Psychopathology as the crystallization of culture. In DiamondI.QuimbyL. (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault (pp. 87-117). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
6.
BurkeK. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1950)
7.
ChaputM.BrummansB. H. J. M.CoorenF. (2011). The role of organizational identification in the communicative constitution of an organization: A study of consubstantialization in a young political party. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 252-282. doi:10.1177/0893318910386719
8.
CheneyG. (1995). Democracy in the workplace: Theory and practice from the perspective of communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 167-200. doi:10.1080/00909889509365424
9.
CheneyG.AshcraftK. L. (2007). Considering “the professional” in communication studies: Implications for theory and research within and beyond the boundaries of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 17, 146-175. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00290.x
10.
CheneyG.CloudD. (2006). Doing democracy, engaging the material: Employee participation and labor activity in an age of market globalization. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 501-540. doi:10.1177/0893318905285485
11.
ClairR. P. (1996). The political nature of the colloquialism, “a real job”: Implications for organizational socialization. Communication Monographs, 63, 249-267. doi:10.1080/03637759609376392
12.
CloudD. (1994). The materiality of discourse as oxymoron: A challenge to critical rhetoric. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 141-163. doi:10.1080/10570319409374493
13.
CoorenF. (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In CoorenF.TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81-100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
CoorenF.BrummansB. H. J. M.CharrierasD. (2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Médecins sans Frontières in action. Human Relations, 61, 1339-1370. doi:10.1177/0018726708095707
15.
CoorenF.KuhnT.CornelissenJ. P.ClarkT. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32, 1149-1170. doi:10.1177/0170840611410836
16.
CsordasT. J. (1994). Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self (Vol. 2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DeetzS. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14, 5-26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00301.x
19.
Fausto-SterlingA. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
GillespieS. R. (2001). The politics of breathing: Asthmatic Medicaid patients under managed care. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 97-116. doi:10.1080/00909880128105
21.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
22.
HarterL. M.BerquistC.TitsworthB. S.NovakD.BrokawT. (2005). The structuring of invisibility among the hidden homeless: The politics of space, stigma, and identity construction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 305-327. doi:10.1080/00909880500278079
23.
HarterL. M.KroneK. (2001). The boundary-spanning role of a cooperative support organization: Managing the paradox of stability and change in non-traditional organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 248-277. doi:10.1080/00909880128111
24.
HowleyK. (2003). A poverty of voices: Street papers as communicative democracy. Journalism, 4, 273-292. doi:10.1177/14648849030043002
25.
IsbellM. G. (2012). The role of boundary spanners as the interorganizational link in nonprofit collaborating. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 159-165. doi:10.1177/0893318911423641
26.
KoschmannM. A.McDonaldJ. (2015). Organizational rituals, communication, and the question of agency. Management Communication Quarterly, 29, 229-256. doi:10.1177/0893318915572386
27.
LeonardiP. M. (2009). Why do people reject new technologies and stymie organizational changes of which they are in favor? Exploring misalignments between social interactions and materiality. Human Communication Research, 25, 407-441. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01357.x
28.
LindemannK. (2007). A tough sell: Stigma as souvenir in the contested performances of San Francisco’s homeless Street Sheet vendors. Text and Performance Quarterly, 27, 41-57. doi:10.1080/10462930601046012
29.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2010). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
McKerrowR. E. (1998). Corporeality and cultural rhetoric: A site for rhetoric’s future. Southern Communication Journal, 63, 315-328. doi:10.1080/10417949809373105
31.
MeisenbachR. J. (2008). Working with tensions: Materiality, discourse, and (dis)empowerment in occupational identity negotiation among higher education fund-raisers. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 258-287. doi:10.1177/0893318908323150
32.
MitraR. (2013). From transformational leadership to leadership trans-formations: A critical dialogic perspective. Communication Theory, 23, 395-416. doi:10.1111/comt.12022
33.
NelsonK. (2014, July11). San Jose: Homeless cleaning up downtown as part of new program. San Jose Mercury News. Available from http://www.mercurynews.com/
34.
NovakD. R. (2010). Democratizing qualitative research: Photovoice and the study of human communication. Communication Methods and Measures, 4, 291-310. doi:10.1080/19312458.2010.527870
35.
NovakD. R.HarterL. M. (2008). “Flipping the scripts” of poverty and panhandling: Organizing democracy by creating connections. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 391-414. doi:10.1080/00909880802104890
PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (2009). Communicative constitution of organization is a question: Critical issues for addressing it. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 158-165. doi:10.1177/0893318909351581
40.
ShomeR. (2003). Space matters: The power and practice of space. Communication Theory, 13, 39-56. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00281.x
41.
StohlC.CheneyG. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407. doi:10.1177/0893318901143001
TompkinsP. K. (2009). Who is my neighbor? Communicating and organizing to end homelessness. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
45.
TrippD. H. (1983). Co-authorship and negotiation: The interview as act of creation. Interchange, 14, 32-45. doi:10.1007/BF01810469
46.
VásquezC.CoorenF. (2013). Spacing practices: The communicative configuration of organizing through space-times. Communication Theory, 23, 25-27. doi:10.1111/comt.12003
47.
WassermanH. (2011). Mobile phones, popular media, and everyday African democracy: Transmissions and transgressions. Popular Communication, 9, 146-158. doi:10.1080/15405702.2011.562097
48.
WorthamJ. (2012, March12). Use of homeless as internet hot spots backfires on marketer. The New York Times. Available from www.nytimes.com
49.
ZollerH. M. (2003). Working out: Managerialism in the workplace health promotion. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 171-205. doi:10.1177/0893318903253003
