Using Dialectics to Build Leader-Stakeholder Relationships: An Exploratory Study on Relational Dialectics in Chinese Corporate Leaders’ Web-Based Messages
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2018
Using Dialectics to Build Leader-Stakeholder Relationships: An Exploratory Study on Relational Dialectics in Chinese Corporate Leaders’ Web-Based Messages
In large Chinese corporations operating in the Greater China region, there is an increasing use of web-based bilingual messages by their corporate leaders for fostering relationships with stakeholders. Although frequently presented as literal translations of each other, leaders’ bilingual communication sometimes tends to exhibit nonliteral variations. This study aims to examine the relational dialectics theory in the construction of leader-stakeholder relationships in leaders’ bilingual web-based messages and explores the dialectical oppositions that are embedded in the Chinese and English versions of these messages. The results suggest that leaders’ communication is characterized by the deliberate use of different dialectics that allow them to tailor their communication to the perceived needs of stakeholders from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. In particular, the Chinese version of the message is adapted to exude greater connection, openness, affection, and predictability in content as well as style, which is believed to strengthen relationships with stakeholders.
ApkerJ.ProppK. M.Zabava FordW. S. (2005). Negotiating status and identity tensions in health care team interactions: An exploration of nurse role dialectics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 93-115.
2.
AxielaJ. F. (1996). Culture-specific items in translation. In AlvarezR.VidalM. C. (Eds.), Translation, power, subversion (pp. 52-78). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
3.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (HolquistM., Ed.; EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BaxterL. A. (1988). A dialectical perspective on communication strategies in relationship development. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 257-273). Chichester, England: Wiley.
5.
BaxterL. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69-88.
6.
BaxterL. A. (2004). A tale of two voices: Relational dialectics theory. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 181-192.
7.
BaxterL. A. (2006). Communication as dialogue. In ShepherdG. J.St. JohnJ.StriphasT. (Eds.), Communication as . . . perspectives on theory (pp. 101-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
BaxterL. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
BaxterL. A.BraithwaiteD. O. (2008). Relational dialectics theory. In BaxterL. A.BraithwaiteD. O. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 349-362). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
BaxterL. A.BraithwaiteD. O. (2010). Relational dialectics theory, applied. In SmithS. W.WilsonS. R. (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 48-66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
BaxterL. A.MontgomeryB. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
BergJ. H. (1987). Responsiveness and self-disclosure. In DerlegaV. J.BergJ. H. (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research and therapy (pp. 101-130). New York, NY: Plenum.
13.
BridgeK.BaxterL. A. (1992). Blended friendships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 200-225.
D’AprixR. (2009). The credible company. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
ErbertL. A. (2014). Antagonistic and nonantagonistic dialectical contradictions in organizational conflict. International Journal of Business Communication, 51, 138-158.
17.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
18.
GochecoP. M. (2012). Pronominal choice: A reflection of culture and persuasion in Philippine political campaign discourse. Philippine ESL Journal, 8, 4-25.
19.
HallE. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
20.
HofstedeG. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
HofstedeG. H.HofstedeG. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
22.
HuiC.LeeC.RousseauD. M. (2004). Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people?Organization Science, 15, 232-240.
23.
JohnsonA. (2009). The rise of English: The language of globalization in China and the European Union. Macalester International, 22, 131-168.
24.
KitchenP. J.SchultzD. E. (2001). Raising the corporate umbrella: Corporate communications in the 21st century. New York, NY: Palgrave.
25.
MishraK.BoyntonL.MishraA. (2014). Driving employee engagement: The expanded role of internal communications. International Journal of Business Communication, 51, 183-202.
26.
MontgomeryB. M. (1992). Communication as the interface between couples and culture. In DeetzS. A. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 15 (pp. 475-507). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
NgaiC. S.B.SinghR. G. (2014). Communication with stakeholders through corporate web sites: An exploratory study on the CEO messages of major corporations in Greater China. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28, 352-394.
28.
NganH. Y. W. (2009). Developing biliteracy through studying the bilingual representation phenomenon in translation texts. Babel, 55, 40-57.
29.
O’BoyleN. (2014). Front row friendships: Relational dialectics and identity negotiations by mature students at university. Communication Education, 63, 169-191.
30.
PettigrewJ. (1981). Reminiscences of fieldwork among the Sikhs. In RobertH. (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 62-82). London, England: Routledge.
31.
RawlinsW. K. (1989). A dialectical analysis of the tensions, functions, and strategic directions of communication in young adult friendships. In AndersonJ. A. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 12 (pp.157-189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
SahlsteinE. M. (2004). Relating at a distance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 689-710.
33.
SegarsA. H.KohutG. F. (2001). Strategic communication through the World Wide Web: An empirical model of effectiveness in the CEO’s letter to shareholders. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 535-556.
34.
TrompenaarsF.Hampden-TurnerC. (2012). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35.
WeidenbaumM. L. (1993). Greater China: The next economic superpower?St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University in St. Louis.
36.
WestR.TurnerL. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
37.
YumJ. O. (1997). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. In SamovarL. A.PorterR. E. (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 78-88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38.
ZornT. (1995). Bosses and buddies: Constructing and performing simultaneously hierarchical and close friendship relationships. In WoodJ. T.DuckS. W. (Eds.), Understanding relationship processes (pp.122-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
ZornT. (2001). Talking heads: The CEOs as spokesperson. In KitchenP. J.SchultzD. E. (Eds.), Raising the corporate umbrella: Corporate communication in the 21st century (pp. 23-42). New York, NY: Palgrave.
