BoydJ. (2009). 756*: The legitimacy of a baseball number. In HeathR. L.TothE. L.WaymerD. (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations II (pp. 154-169). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
HeathR. L. (1997). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
HeathR. L.NelsonR. A. (1986). Issues management: Corporate public policy making in an information society. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
4.
HeathR. L.PalencharM. J. (2009). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
HolmstromS. (2004). The reflective paradigm of public relations. In van RulerB.VercicD. (Eds.), Public relations and communication management in Europe (pp. 121-133). Berlin, Germany: Moutonde Gruyter.
6.
HolmstromS. (2010). Reflective management: Seeing the organization as if from outside. In HeathR. L. (Ed.), SAGE handbook of public relations (pp. 261-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
MayS. (2008). Reconsidering strategic corporate social responsibility: Public relations and ethical engagement of employees in a global economy. In ZerfassA.van RulerB.SrirameshK. (Eds.), Public relations research: European and international perspectives and innovations (pp. 365-383). Weisbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
8.
ReichR. B. (2008, August1). The case against corporate responsibility (Working Paper No. GSPP08-003). Berkeley: Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California.
9.
SethiS. P. (1977). Advocacy advertising and large corporations: Social conflict, big business image, the news media, and public policy. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
