This case study provides an illustrative example of how nationalism can be exploited to shift media attention in a crisis involving international organizations. Semantic network analysis is used to explore the relationships among different meanings packaged in a corporation’s value advocacy messages. The semantic network analysis shows the semantic structure of the value advocacy messages and maps the structure of media coverage before and after the advocacy messages were released. The findings indicate that the value advocacy campaign effectively diversified the focus of media coverage. Implications for business communication research and practice are provided.
AnS. K.ParkD. J.ChoS.BergerB. (2010). A cross-cultural study of effective organizational crisis response strategy in the United States and South Korea. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 225-243.
BaughnC. C.YaprakA. (1993). Mapping country-of-origin research: Recent developments and emerging avenues. In Papadopou-losN.HeslopL. (Eds.), Product-country images: Impact and role in international marketing (pp. 89-115). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
4.
BenoitW. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. Albany: State University of New York.
5.
BenoitW. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 45, 251-268.
6.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.FreemanL. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis [computer software]. MA: Harward.
7.
BostdorffD. M.VibbertS. L. (1994). Values advocacy: Enhancing organizational images, deflecting public criticism, and grounding future arguments. Public Relations Review, 20, 141-158.
8.
CallE. (2006). Mending the web of life: Chinese medicine and species conservation. Silver Springs, MD: IFAW/AHPA-ERB Foundation.
9.
CarleyK. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75-126.
10.
CheneyG.DionisopoulosG. N. (1989). Public relations? No, relations with publics: A rhetorical–organizational approach to contemporary corporate communications. In BotanC. H.HazeltonV.Jr. (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 135-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
ChungC. J.ParkH. W. (2010). Textual analysis of a political message: The inaugural addresses of two Korean presidents. Social Science Information, 49, 215-239.
12.
CoombsW. T. (1998). An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 177-191.
13.
CoombsW. T. (2004). Impact of past crises on current crisis communication. Insights from situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 265-289.
14.
CoombsW. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163-176.
15.
CoombsT. W. (2009). Crisis, crisis communication, reputation, and rhetoric. In HeathR. L.TothE. L.WaymerD. (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations II (pp. 237-252). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 279-295.
17.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2001). An extended examination of the crisis situation: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 321-340.
18.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 165-186.
19.
CrableR. E.VibbertS. L. (1983). Mobil’s epideictic advocacy: “Observations” of Prometheus-Bound. Communication Monographs, 50, 380-394.
20.
DoerfelM. L. (1998).What constitutes semantic network analysis? A comparison of research and methodologies. Connections, 21(2), 16-78.
21.
DoerfelM. L.BarnettG. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the international communication association. Human Communication Research, 25, 589-603.
22.
DowlingJ.PfefferJ. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
23.
DreyerJ. T. (1976). China’s forty million: Minority nationalities and national integration in the People’s Republic of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Elbert Technology. (2011). ZIPF [computer software]. New York: Buffalo.
25.
FriedkinN. A. (1983). Horizons of observability and limits of informal control in organizations. Social Forces, 62, 54-77.
26.
GoldmanS. R.SaulE. U.CotéN. (1995). Paragraphing, reader, and task effects on discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 273-305.
27.
GreenfeldL. (1992). Nationalism: Five roads to modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
GrunigJ. E. (1997). Public relations management in government and business. In GarnettJ. L.KouzminA. (Eds.), Handbook of administrative communication (pp. 241-283). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
29.
Guizhentang accused Asian Animal Foundation (AAF) as an illegal organization and lobbied the government to ban AAF’s action in China. (2012, May13). First Business Daily, p. A2.
HeathR. L. (1980). Corporate advocacy: An application of speech communication perspectives and skills—and more. Communication Education, 29, 370-377.
32.
HeathR. L.MillarD. P. (2004). A rhetorical approach to crisis communication: Management, communication processes, and strategic responses. In HeathR. L.MillarD. P. (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 1-18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
HolmströmS.FalkheimerJ.NielsenA. G. (2010). Legitimacy and strategic communication in globalization: The cartoon crisis and other legitimacy conflicts. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 1-18.
34.
HuoY. L. (2012, February28). The blocked way to market? Was Guizhentang Co. sabotaged?Business Review, p. B13.
35.
KentM. L.TaylorM.VeilS. R. (2011). Issues management makeover: A facelift for an aging theory. In GoralskiM.LeBlancH. P.IIIAdamsM. L. (Eds.), Business research yearbook: Balancing profitability and sustainability: Shaping the future of business (pp. 534-541). Beltsville, MD: International Academy of Business Disciplines.
36.
KiE.-J.BrownK. A. (2013). The effects of crisis response strategies on relationship quality outcomes. Journal of Business Communication, 50, 403-420.
37.
KimJ. H. (2012). A hyperlink and semantic network analysis of the triple helix (university-government-industry): The interorganizational communication structure of nanotechnology. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 152-170.
38.
KwonK.BarnettG. A.ChenH. (2009). Assessing cultural differences in translations: A semantic network analysis of the universal declaration of human rights. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2, 170-138. doi:10.1080/17513050902759488
39.
LiP. J. (2006). The evolving animal rights and welfare debate in China: Political and social impact analysis. In D’SilvaJ.TurnerJ. (Eds.), Animals, ethics and trade: The challenge of animal sentience (pp. 111-128). London, England: Earthscan.
MasseyJ. E. (2001). Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organizations in crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 153-183.
42.
MaynardM. L. (1997). Opportunity in paid vs. unpaid public relations internships: A semantic network analysis. Public Relations Review, 23, 377-391.
MillnerA. G.VeilS. R.SellnowT. L. (2011). Proxy communication in crisis response. Public Relations Review, 37, 74-76.
45.
MurphyP. (2010). The intractability of reputation: Media coverage as a complex system in the case of Martha Stewart. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 209-237.
46.
O’ConnorA. (2006). Merchant of mercy, merchant of death: How values advocacy messages influence jury deliberations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 263-284.
47.
OliveiraM. F. (2013). Multicultural environments and their challenges to crisis communication. Journal of Business Communication, 50, 253-277.
48.
PauchantT. C.MitroffI. I. (1992). Transforming the crisis-prone organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
PerlemanC. (1982). The realm of rhetoric [W. Kluback, Trans.]. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
50.
ReganT. (1987). The case for animal rights. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
51.
RheeM.ValdezM. E. (2009). Contextual factors surrounding reputation damage with potential implications for reputation repair. Academy of Management Review, 34, 146-168.
52.
RiceR. E.DanowskiJ. A. (1993). Is it really just a like a fancy answering machine? Comparing semantic networks of different types of voicemail users. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 369-397.
53.
SchuetzJ. (1990). Corporate advocacy as argumentation. In TrappR.SchuetzY. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation (pp. 272-284). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
54.
SchultzF.KleinnijenhuisJ.OegemaD.UtzS.van AtteveldtW. (2012). Strategic framing in the BP crisis: A semantic network analysis of associative framesPublic Relations Review, 38, 97-107.
55.
SchultzF.RauppJ. (2010). The social construction of crises in governmental and corporate communications: An inter-organizational and inter-systemic analysis. Public Relations Review, 36, 112-119. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.11.002
56.
SeegerM. W. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: An expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 234-244.
57.
SheerV. C.ChenL. (2003). Successful Sino-Western business negotiation: Participants’ accounts of national and professional cultures. Journal of Business Communication, 40(1), 50-85.
58.
StibbeA. (2001). Language, power and the social construction of animals. Society & Animals, 9, 145-161.
59.
SvenssonP. (2009). Embracing left and right: Image repair and crisis communication in a polarized ideological milieu. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 555-576.
60.
TaylorM. (2007, November). How the third party effect influences how organizations respond to a product recall crisis. Paper presented at the National Communication Association 93rd Annual Convention, Chicago, IL.
61.
TrujilloN.TothE. L. (1987). Organizational perspectives for public relations research and practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 199-231.
62.
UlmerR. R. (2001). Effective crisis management through established stakeholder relationships: Malden Mills as a case study. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 590-615.
63.
VeilS. R.KentM. (2008). Issues management and inoculation: Tylenol’s responsible dosing advertising. Public Relations Review, 34, 399-402.
64.
WangJ. (2005). Consumer nationalism and corporate reputation management in the global era. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10, 223-239.
65.
WangJ. (2006). The politics of goods: A case study of consumer nationalism and media discourse in contemporary China. Asian Journal of Communication, 16, 187-206.
66.
WareB. L.LinkugelW. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 273-283.
67.
WeiS. (2006). Animal welfare legislation in China: Public understanding and education. In D’SilvaJ.TurnerJ. (Eds.), Animals, ethics and trade: The challenge of animal sentience (pp. 101-110). London, England: Earthscan.
68.
XieL. (2009). Environmental activism in China. Oxon, England: Routledge.
69.
YangA.KlyuevaA.TaylorM. (2012). A relational approach to public diplomacy in a multipolar world: Building public relations theory by analyzing the U.S.-Russia-China relationship. Public Relations Review, 38, 201-224.
70.
YangA.TaylorM. (2010). Relationship-building by Chinese ENGOs’ websites: Education, not activation. Public Relations Review, 36, 342-351.
71.
ZhaoD. (2002). An angle on nationalism in China today: Attitudes among Beijing students after Belgrade1999. China Quarterly, 172, 885-905.
72.
ZhaoJ. J. (2000). The Chinese approach to international business negotiation. Journal of Business Communication, 37, 209-237.
ZollerH. M. (2004). Dialogue as global issue management: Legitimizing corporate influence in the transatlantic business dialogue. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 204-240.
