In this study, we revisit alternative feminist organizing in order to identify the dialectical tensions, paradoxical discourses, and agentic qualities of women’s participation in an online antifeminist space. We engage in text mining, semantic network analysis, and the constant comparative method to identify dialogical tensions and the paradoxical organizing strategies of Red Pill Women, an online community on the social networking platform, Reddit. Through analyzing Red Pill Women as an antifeminist space constituted through postfeminist logics, we identify three paradoxical tensions, begin to disentangle postfeminism from antifeminism, and build on alternative organizing theory with recent work on hidden and invisible organizations to further theorize gendered (in)visibility and (anti)feminist organizing practices.
AdlerP. S.GoldoftasB.LevineD. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization science, 10(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
3.
AllenB. J. (1996). Feminist standpoint theory: A black woman’s (re) view of organizational socialization. Communication Studies, 47(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368482
4.
ArthursJ. (2003). Sex and the City and consumer culture: Remediating postfeminist drama. Feminist Media Studies, 3(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/146877032000080149
5.
AshcraftK. L. (2001). Feminist organizing and the construction of “alternative” community. In ShepherdG.J.RothenbuhlerE.W. (Eds.), Communication and community (pp. 79–110). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
6.
AshcraftK. L.TretheweyA. (2004). Special issue synthesis: Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14795752.2004.10058565
7.
Banet-WeiserS.GillR.RottenbergC. (2020). Postfeminism, popular feminism, and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Benet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill, and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation. Feminist Theory, 21(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700119842555
8.
Banet-WeiserS.Portwood-StacerL. (2006). ‘I just want to be me again!’ Beauty pageants, reality television, and post-feminism. Feminist Theory, 7(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1464700106064423
BergstromK. (2015). Feminism is for angry white women: Exploring images of feminism on Reddit.com [Conference presentation]. The 16th Annual Meeting of the Association of Internet Researchers, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
BleeK. M. (2008). Women of the Klan: Racism and gender in the 1920s. University of California Press.
13.
BoeijeH. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
14.
ButlerJ. (2013). For white girls only? Postfeminism and the politics of inclusion. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 35–58. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43860666
15.
BuzzanellP. M. (1994). Gaining a voice: Feminist organizational communication theorizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 7(4), 339–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318994007004001
16.
BuzzanellP. M. (1995). Reframing the glass ceiling as a socially constructed process: Implications for understanding and change. Communications Monographs, 62(4), 327–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376366
17.
BuzzanellP.M. (2000). Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives. Sage.
18.
BuzzanellP. M.EllingsonL.SilvioC.PaschV.DaleB.MauroG.SmithE.WeirN.MartinC. (1997). Leadership processes in alternative organizations: Invitational and dramaturgical leadership. Communication Studies, 48(4), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368509
CheneyG. (1995). Democracy in the workplace: Theory and practice from the perspective of communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23(3), 167–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889509365424
ChoiS. Y.LaiR. Y.PangJ. C. (2020). Gender irrelevance: How women and men rationalize their support for the right. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 45(2), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/705006
24.
CoorenF.KuhnT.CornelissenJ.ClarkT. (2011). Communication, organizing, and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organizational Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170. http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410836
25.
CruzJ. M. (2017). Invisibility and visibility in alternative organizing: A communicative and cultural model. Managmnet Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 614–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917725202
26.
DenisonD. R.HooijbergR.QuinnR. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization science, 6(5), 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
27.
DignamP. A.RohlingerD. A. (2019). Misogynistic men online: How the red pill helped elect trump. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(3), 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1086/701155
28.
DuffyB. E. (2010). Empowerment through endorsement? Polysemic meaning in Dove’s user-generated advertising. Communication, Culture, & Critique, 3, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01056.x
EddingtonS. M. (2018). The communicative constitution of hate organizations online: A semantic network analysis of “Make America Great Again”. Social Media+ Society, 4(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/2056305118790763.
32.
EddingtonS. M. (2020). Alt-resilience: A semantic network analysis of identity (re)construction in an online men’s rights community. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.176099
33.
FaludiS. (2006). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. Three Rivers Press.
34.
FaulknerW. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1(3), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620903225059
35.
FinnemanT. (2020). A countermovement on the verge of defeat: Antisuffragist arguments in 1917 press coverage. In SteinerL.KitchC.KroegerB. (Eds.), Front pages, front lines: Media and the fight for women’s suffrage (pp. 134–152). University of Illinois Press.
GeeJ. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Routledge.
38.
GenzS. (2009). Postfemininities in popular culture. Springer.
39.
GenzS. (2015). My job is me: Postfeminist celebrity culture and the gendering of authenticity. Feminist Media Studies, 15(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.952758
40.
GillR. (2003). From sexual objectification to sexual subjectification: The resexualisation of women’s bodies in the media. Feminist Media Studies, 3(1), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468077032000080158
41.
GingD. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
42.
GlaserB. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
43.
GrecoM.StennerP. (2017). From paradox to pattern shift: Conceptualising liminal hotspots and their affective dynamics. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317692120
44.
GrimmerJ. (2017). Measuring representational style in the house. In AlvarezR.M. (Ed.), Computational Social Science (pp. 225–245). Cambridge University Press.
JensenP. R.MeisenbachR. J. (2015). Alternative organizing and (in)visibility: Managing tensions of transparency and autonomy in a nonprofit organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 564–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915600577
50.
JordanA. (2016). Conceptualizing backlash: (UK) men’s rights groups, anti-feminism, and postfeminism. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 28(1), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.28.1.18
51.
KrämerB. (2017). Populist online practices: the function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520
52.
Lagorio-ChafkinC. (2018). We are the nerds: The birth and tumultuous life of Reddit, the internet’s culture laboratory. Hachette UK.
53.
LambertN. J. (2017). Text mining tutorial. In. PilnyA.PooleM. S. (Eds.), Group processes: Computational and data driven approaches. (pp. 93–118). Springer.
54.
LammersJ. C.LambertN. J.AbendscheinB.Reynolds-TylusT.VaravaK. A. (2016). Expertise in context. In TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M. (Eds.), Expertise, communication, and organizing (pp. 145–167). Oxford University Press.
55.
LinJ. L. (2017). Antifeminism online: MGTOW (men going their own way). In FrömmingU. U.KöhnS.FoxS.TerryM. (Eds.), Digital environments: Ethnographic perspectives across global online and offline spaces (pp. 77–96). Bielefeld.
56.
LinabaryJ. R.CorpleD. J.CookyC. (2020). Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed. New Media & Society, 22(10), 1827–1848. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819884635.
57.
LünenborgM. (2020). Affective publics: Understanding the dynamic formation of public articulations beyond the public sphere. In FleigA.von ScheveC. (Eds.), Public spheres of resonance: Constellations of affect and language (pp. 30–48). Routledge.
58.
MarshallS. E. (1991). Who speaks for American women? The future of antifeminism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 515(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716291515001005
59.
MarwickA. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.
60.
MarwickA. E.CaplanR. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568
61.
MarwickA. E.LewisR. (2018). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.
62.
MassanariA. L. (2015). Participatory culture, community, and play: Learning from Reddit. Peter Lang.
63.
MassanariA. L. (2017). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807
64.
MatiasJ. N. (2016). Going dark: Social factors in collective action against platform operators in the Reddit blackout. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1138–1151). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858391
McRobbieA. (2004). Notes on postfeminism and popular culture: Bridget Jones and the new gender regime. In HarrisA. (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power, and identity (pp. 3–14). Routledge.
67.
MessnerM. (2016). Forks in the road of men’s gender politics: Men’s rights vs feminist allies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i2.301
68.
MurnighanJ. K.ConlonD. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393352
69.
NagleA. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. Zero Book.
PruchniewskaU. (2019). “A group that’s just women for women”: Feminist affordances of private Facebook groups for professionals. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1362–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818822490
75.
PutnamL. L. (1986). Contradictions and paradoxes in organizations. In ThayerL. (Ed.), Organization-communication: Emerging Perspective 1 (pp. 151–167). Ablex.
76.
PutnamL. L.AshcraftK. L. (2017). Gender and organizational paradox. In SmithW. K.LewisM. W.JarzabkowskiJ.LangleyA. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational paradox: Approaches to plurality, tensions and contradictions (pp. 333–352). Oxford.
77.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
SchmitzR. M.KazyakE. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences, 5(18), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5020018
80.
SchreiberR. (2002). Injecting a woman’s voice: Conservative women’s organizations, gender consciousness, and the expression of women’s policy preferences. Sex Roles, 47(7–8), 331–342. https://doi.org/0360-0025/1000-0331/0
81.
SchreiberR. (2012). Dilemmas in representation: Conservative and feminist women’s organizations react to Sarah Palin. In BleeK. M.DeutschS. M. (Eds.), Women of the right: Comparisons and interplay across borders (pp. 273–290). The Pennsylvania State University Press.
82.
SchreiberR. (2014). Understanding the future of feminism requires understanding conservative women. Politics & Gender, 10(20), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000087
ScottC. R. (2013). Anonymous agencies, backstreet businesses, and covert collectives: Rethinking organizations in the 21st century. Stanford University Press.
85.
ScottC. R. (2015). Bringing hidden organizations out of the shadows: Introduction to the special issue. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915596205
86.
SingerP.FlöckF.MeinhartC.ZeitfogelE.StrohmaierM. (2014, April). Evolution of Reddit: From the front page of the internet to a self-referential community?Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, Seoul, (pp. 517–522). https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2576943
87.
SmithB. G.SmithS. B.KnightonD. (2018). Social media dialogues in a crisis: A mixed-methods approach to identifying publics on social media. Public Relations Review, 44(4), 562–573. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.005
88.
SmithM.CeniA.Milic-FraylingN.ShneidermanB.Mendes RodriguesE.LeskovecJ.DunneC. (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016. Retrieved from http://nodexl.codeplex.com/
89.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
SowaJ.F. (1984). Conceptual structures: Information processioning in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley.
94.
StohlC.CheneyG. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 349–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318901143001
95.
StohlC.StohlM. (2011). Secret agencies: The communicative constitution of a clandestine organization. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1197–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348535
96.
StohlC.StohlM. (2017). Clandestine/hidden organizations. In ScottC.LewisL. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–9). Wiley Blackwell.
97.
StuartA. (1990). Feminism dead or alive? In RutherfordJ. (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 28–42). Lawrence & Wishart.
ThwaitesR. (2017). Making a choice or taking a stand? Choice feminism, political engagement and the contemporary feminist movement. Feminist Theory, 18(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700116683657
100.
TurnerV. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Cornell University Press.
101.
Van ValkenburghS. (2018). Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and neolilberalism in the manosphere. Men and Masculinities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18816118
WebbT.CheneyG. (2014). Worker-owned-and-governed co-operatives and the wider co-operative movement: Challenges and opportunities within and beyond the global economic crisis. In ParkerM.CheneyG.FournierV.LandC. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to alternative organization (pp. 88–112). Routledge.
