Many conversations involve sending or receiving “bad news.” These conversations are often dreaded, poorly executed, or avoided altogether. Ways need to be found to make them less difficult and more productive. We explored these issues through three methodologically diverse studies. Study 1 comprised in-depth interviews with 24 nurse managers. Interviews shed light on the characteristics of difficult conversations and strategies for making them less awkward and more successful. Study 2 was a survey investigating relationships between six dimensions of supportive communication and participant satisfaction with a difficult superior-subordinate conversation. Study 3 experimentally manipulated two supportive communication behaviors, plus a third variable, face-work. Together, these studies show that successful outcomes from difficult workplace conversations require the parties to balance task and relational goals, with the latter particularly dependent on acts of empathy and face-giving.
AdlerR. B.RodmanG. (2009). Understanding human communication (10th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlexanderJ. F. (1979). The reduction of cognitive conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 23, 120–138.
3.
BaronR. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 199–207.
4.
BaronR. A. (1990). Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 235–245.
5.
BiselR. S.MessersmithA. S.KelleyK. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication: hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. Journal of Business Communication, 49, 128–147. doi: 10.1177/0021943612436972
6.
BjorkmanI.LuY. (1999). The management of human resources in Chinese-Western joint ventures. Journal of World Business, 34, 306–324.
7.
BradleyG. L.SparksB. A.ZapfD.McColl-KennedyJ. R.JimmiesonN. L. (2013). Task-Relationship-Self: A framework for understanding service encounter behaviours. Psychology and Marketing, 30, 512-528. doi:10.1002/mar.20624.
8.
BrehmS. S.BrehmJ. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
9.
BrownM.HyattD.BensonJ. (2010). Consequences of the performance appraisal experience. Personnel Review, 39, 375–396. doi: 10.1108/0043481011030557
10.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CarsonC. L.CupachW. R. (2000). Facing corrections in the workplace: The influence of perceived face threat on the consequences of managerial reproaches. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 215–234.
12.
CialdiniR. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
CliftonJ. (2012). Conversation analysis in dialogue with stocks of interactional knowledge: Facework and appraisal interviews. Journal of Business Communication, 49, 283–311. doi: 10.1177/0021943612436974
14.
CloudH.TownsendJ. (2005). How to have that difficult conversation you’ve been avoiding. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
15.
CostiganJ. L.SchmeidlerM. A. (1984). Exploring supportive and defensive communication climates. In PfeifferJ. W.GoodsteinL. D. (Eds.), The 1984 handbook for group facilitators (pp. 112–114). San Diego, CA: University Associates.
16.
De DreuC. K. W.GelfandM. J. (2008). Conflict in the workplace: Sources, functions, and dynamics across multiple levels of analysis. In De DreuC. K. W.GelfandM. J. (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 3–54). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
DeutschM. (1994). Constructive conflict resolution: Principles, training, and research. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 13–32.
18.
DicksonA. (2006). Difficult conversations: What to say in tricky situations without ruining the relationship. London: Piatkus Books.
19.
ForwardG. L.CzechK.LeeC. M. (2011). Assessing Gibb’s supportive and defensive communication climate: An examination of measurement and construct validity. Communication Research Reports, 28, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.541360
20.
GeddesD.BaronR. A. (1997). Workplace aggression as a consequence of negative performance feedback. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 433–454.
21.
GibbJ. R. (1961). Defensive communication. The Journal of Communication, 11, 141–148.
22.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
IlgenD. R.DavisC. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 550–565.
25.
Kerssen-GriepJ.TreesA. R.HessJ. A. (2008). Attentive facework during instructional feedback: Key to perceiving mentorship and an optimal learning environment. Communication Education, 57, 312–332. doi: 10.1080/03634520802027347
26.
KlugerA. N.DeNisiA. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.
27.
KosmoskiG. J.PollackD. R. (2005). Managing difficult, frustrating, and hostile conversations: Strategies for Savvy administrators (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
LehmanW. E. K.SimpsonD. D. (1992). Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 309–321.
29.
LizzioA.WilsonK.MacKayL. (2008). Manager’ and subordinates’ evaluations of feedback strategies: The critical contribution of voice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 919–946.
30.
MacDonaldE. (2004). Difficult conversations in medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MadlockP. E.Kennedy-LightseyC. (2010). The effects of supervisors’ verbal aggressiveness and mentoring on their subordinates. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 42–62. doi: 10.1177/0021943609353511
32.
MeyerE. C.SellersD. E.BrowningD. M.McGuffieK.SolomonM. Z.TruogR. D. (2009). Difficult conversations: Improving communication skills and relational abilities in health care. Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, 10, 352–359. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181a3183a
33.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
NeumanW. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
35.
PruittD. G. (1983). Strategic choice in negotiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 167–194.
36.
StampG. H.VangelistiA. L.DalyJ. A. (1992). The creation of defensiveness in social interaction. Communication Quarterly, 40, 177–190.
37.
TataJ. (2002). The influence of managerial accounts on employees’ reactions to negative feedback. Group & Organization Management, 27, 480–503.
38.
TesserA.RosenS. (1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 193–232). New York, NY: Academic Press.
39.
TreesA. R.Kerssen-GriepJ.HessJ. A. (2009). Earning influence by communicating respect: Facework’s contributions to effective instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 397–416. doi: 10.1080/03634520802613419
40.
TriandisH. C. (1994). Culture and social behaviour. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
41.
TynanR. (2005). The effects of threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological safety & upward communication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 223–247.
42.
WangC. L.LinX.ChanA. K. K.ShiY. (2005). Conflict handling styles in international joint ventures: A cross-cultural and cross-national comparison. Management International Review, 45, 3–21.
WillsonP.McNamaraJ. R. (1982). How perceptions of a simulated physician-patient interaction influence intended satisfaction and compliance. Social Science & Medicine, 16, 1699–1704.
45.
WinerS.MajorsR. E. (1981). A research note on supportive and defensive communication: An empirical study of three verbal interpersonal communication variables. Communication Quarterly, 29, 166–172.
