This study examined strange experiences in the workplace from an interpretive-empirical framework. The goal of this study was to examine employee interpretation of strange, unusual, and unexpected workplace experiences. Interviews were conducted with 22 employees of a large national insurance firm in the Midwest that were intended to capture the story theme, employee response, attributions or assignments of causes, and degree of organizational change. Results indicated that the most common strangeness experience themes were lapse or lack of professionalism, general uncertainty, threat to the internal organizational environment, and embarrassment. Employee responses to strange experiences included greater efforts toward information seeking, assistance giving, use of humor, and accommodation to others in the organization. Causal attributions revolved around themes of communication, organizational change, and the nature of personal problems in the workplace. Finally, change themes included “no changes,” consequences for employee actions, and improvements (improved communication, teamwork, problem-solving, conflict management).
BarkerR. T.GowerK. (2010). Strategic application in storytelling in organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 295–312.
2.
BirdS. (2007). Sensemaking and identity. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 311–339.
3.
BojeD. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106–126.
4.
BojeD. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BojeD. M.BurnesB.HassardJ. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge companion to organizational change. London, UK: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
6.
BrownM. H. (1985). That reminds me of a story: Speech action in organizational socialization. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49, 27–42.
7.
BrownM. H. (1990). Defining stories in organizations: Characteristics and functions. Communication Yearbook, 13, 162–190.
8.
BrowningL. D. (1992). Lists and stories as organizational communication. Communication Theory, 24, 281–302.
9.
BurgoonJ. D. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129–142.
10.
BurgoonJ. D.HaleJ. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancies violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58–79.
11.
BurkeK. (1984). Permanence and change (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
12.
BurkeK. (1985). Dramatism and logology. Communication Quarterly, 33, 89–93.
13.
ChristiansonM. K.FarkasM. T.SutcliffeK. M.WeickK. E. (2009). Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. Organization Science, 20, 846–860.
14.
ColvilleI.BrownA. D.PyeA. (2012). Simplexity: Sensemaking, organizing and storytelling for our time. Human Relations, 65, 5–15.
15.
CotterCMarschall, 2006). The persistance of workplace ideology and identity across communicative contexts. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 1-24.
16.
FisherW. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1–22.
17.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradictions in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
GiddensA. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
20.
GurevitchZ. D. (1988). The other side of dialogue: On making the other strange and the experience of otherness. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 1179–1199.
21.
JeongH. S.BrowerR. S. (2008). Extending the present understanding of organizational sensemaking: Three stages and three contexts. Administration & Society, 40, 223–252.
22.
KellyG. A. (1955). A theory of personality. New York: Norton.
23.
KellyG. A. (1970). A brief introduction to personal construct theory. In BannisterD. (Ed.), Perspectives in personal construct psychology (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Academic Press. (Original work published 1966)
24.
KellyJ. W. (1985). Storytelling in high tech organizations: A medium for sharing culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 13, 45–58.
25.
KirbyE. L.WielandS. M. B.McBrideM. C. (2013). Work-life conflict. In OetzelJ. G.Ting-ToomeyS. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of conflict communication (2nd ed., pp. 377–402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Le PoireB. A.BurgoonJ. K. (1994). Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: Expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory. Human Communication Research, 20, 560–591.
27.
LuhmanJ. T. (2005). Narrative processes in organizational discourse. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 7, 15–22.
28.
MartinJ.FeldmanM. S.HatchM. J.SitkinS. B. (1983). The uniqueness paradox of organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 438–453.
29.
MeyerJ. C. (1995). Tell me a story: Eliciting organizational values from narratives. Communication Quarterly, 43, 210–224.
30.
OrrJ. (1987). Narratives at work. Field Service Manager, 47–60.
31.
PacanowskyM. E.O’Donnell-TrujilloN. (1983). Organizational communication as cultural performance. Communication Monographs, 50, 126–148.
32.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
WeickK. E. (2001). Sensemaking in organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
WeickK. E. (2012). Organized sensemaking: A commentary on processes of interpretive work. Human Relations, 65, 141–153.
35.
WeickK. E.BrowningL. D (1986). Argument and narration in organizational communication. Journal of Management, 12, 243–259.
36.
WhiteH. (1981). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In MitchellW. J. T. (Ed.), On Narrativity (pp. 1–23). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
