The present article deals with decision making as a communicative process taking place in organizations as social systems. We will investigate the process whereby decisions are produced, before being announced, by looking at turn design and sequence organization in the interaction, and by considering cultural presuppositions, which are specific patterns of expectations about interlocutors’ expectations. In so doing, we will try to combine theories and methodologies deriving from Conversation Analysis and Social Systems Theory. The article deals with interactionally achieved patterns of expectations concerning participants’ positioning in decision making and analyzes two different forms of decision making, namely, gatekeeping and coordination of participative decision making. These are analyzed within the framework of organizational meetings in which educational activities for children’s camps are planned. The analysis of videotaped and transcribed interactions taking place during these meetings highlights the ways in which different forms of decision making are socially constructed.
AlbyF.ZucchermaglioC. (2006). “Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let’s fix it”: How situated work practices shape groups decision making. Organization Studies, 27, 943-966.
2.
AsmussB.SvennevigJ. (2009). Meeting talk. An introduction. Journal of Business Communication, 46(1), 3-22.
3.
Auer-RizziW.BerryM. (2000). Business vs. cultural frames of reference in group decision-making: Interactions among Austrian, Finnish, and Swedish business students. Journal of Business Communication, 37, 264-292.
4.
BaraldiC. (ed.) (2009) Dialogue in intercultural communities. From an educational point of view. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
5.
BaraldiC. (2012). The function of formulations in polyphonic dialogue. In LordaC.-U.ZabalbeascoaP. (Eds.), Spaces of Polyphony (pp. 73-85). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
6.
BaraldiC.FariniF. (2011). Dialogic mediation in international groups of adolescents. Language and Dialogue, 1(2), 207-232.
7.
BarnesR. (2007). Formulation and the facilitation of agreement in meetings talk. Text & Talk, 27, 273-296.
8.
BarskeT. (2009). Same token, different actions. A conversation analytic study of social roles, embodied actions, and ok in German meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 120-149.
9.
BeachW. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for “casual” “okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325-352.
10.
BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London, England: Sage.
11.
BerryG. R. (2006). Can computer-mediated asynchronous communication improve team processes and decision making? Learning from the management Literature. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 344-366.
12.
BlackL. (2008). Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments. Communication Theory, 18, 93-116.
13.
BohmD. (1996). On dialogue. London, England: Routledge.
14.
CampbellK. S.WhiteC. D.JohnsonD. E. (2003). Leader-member relations as a function of rapport management. Journal of Business Communication, 40, 170-194.
15.
CarbaughD. (1999). Positioning as display of cultural identity. In HarréR.van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 160-177). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
16.
CastorT. (2007). Language use during school board meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 111-136.
17.
CISV. (2008). Building global friendship. Retrieved from http://www.cisv.org
CliftonJ. (2006). A conversation analytical approach to business communication. The case of leadership. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 202-219.
20.
CliftonJ. (2009). Beyond taxonomies of influence. “Doing” influence and making decisions in management team meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 57-79.
21.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In HarréR.van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 32-52). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
22.
DesivilyaS. D.SomechA.LidgosterH. (2010). Innovation and conflict management in work teams: The effects of team identification and task and relationship conflict. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3(1), 28-48.
23.
FrancisD. (1995). Negotiation, decision making and formalism: The problem of form and substance in negotiation analysis. In WagnerJ.EhlichK. (Eds.), The discourse of business negotiation (pp. 37-63). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
24.
GergenK.McNameeS.BarrettF. (2001). Toward transformative dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 697-707.
25.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
HeritageJ. (1985). Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Van DijkT. (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 3. Discourse and dialogue (pp. 95-117). London, England: Academic Press.
28.
HeritageJ.RaymondG. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15-38.
29.
HeritageJ.WatsonR. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In PsathasG. (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 123-162). New York, NY: Irvington.
30.
HernesT.BakkenT. (2003). Implications of self-reference: Niklas Luhmann’s autopoiesis and organization theory. Organization Studies, 24, 1511-1535.
31.
HolmesJ. (2005). Leadership talk: Ho do leaders “do mentoring,” and is gender relevant?Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1779-1800.
32.
HolmesJ. (2007). Monitoring organizational boundaries: Diverse discourse strategies used in gatekeeping. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1993-2016.
33.
HolmesJ.MarraM. (2004). Leadership and managing conflict in meetings. Pragmatics, 14, 439-462.
34.
HolmesJ.SchnurrS.MarraM. (2007). Leadership and communication: Discursive evidence of a workplace culture change. Discourse & Communication, 1, 433-451.
35.
HuismanM. (2001). Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 69-90.
36.
HutchbyI. (2005). Active listening: Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 303-329.
37.
HutchbyI. (2007). The discourse of child counseling. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
38.
JabsL. B. (2005). Communicative rules and organizational decision making. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 265-288.
39.
KangasharjuH. (2002). Alignment in disagreement: Forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1447-1471.
40.
KangasharjuH.NikkoT. (2009). Emotions in organizations. Joint laughter in workplace meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 100-119.
41.
KangaslathiJ.KangaslathiA. (2003). The facilitator: Building constructive experiences for learning. Interspective, 19, 17-19.
42.
LeydesdorffL. (2010). The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens’ “structuration theory” and Luhmann’s “self-organization.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2138-2150.
LuhmannN. (2000). Organization und Entscheidung [Organization and decision]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
45.
MehanH. (1983). The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making. Language in Society, 12, 187-211.
46.
MorgenthalerL. (1990). A study of group process: Who’s got WHAT floor?Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 537-557.
47.
MurrellA. J.StewartA. C.EngelB. T. (1993). Consensus versus devil’s advocacy: The influence of decision process and task structure on strategic decision making. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 399-414.
48.
NielsenM. F. (2009). Interpretative management in business meetings. Understanding managers’ interactional strategies through conversation analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 23-56.
49.
PomerantzA.DenvirP. (2007). Enacting the institutional role of chairperson in upper management meetings: The interactional realization of provisional authority. In CoorenF. (Ed.), Interacting and organizing. Analyses of a management meeting (pp. 31-52). London, England: Erlbaum.
50.
PonciniG. (2007). Discursive strategies in multicultural business meetings. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
51.
PsathasG.AndersonT. (1990). The practices of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica, 78(1/2), 75-99.
52.
SchippersM. C.Den HartogD. N.KoopmanP. L.Van KnippenbergD. (2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 61, 1593-1616.
53.
SchmittR. (2006). Interaction in work meetings. Revue francaise de linguistique appliqué, 11(2), 69-84.
54.
SchnurrS.ChanA. (2011). Exploring another side of co-leadership: Negotiating professional identities through face-work in disagreements. Language in Society, 40, 187-209.
55.
SvennevigJ. (2008). Exploring leadership conversations. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 529-536.
56.
TracyK.DimockA. (2004). Meetings: Discursive sides for building and fragmenting community. In KalbfleischP. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 28 (pp. 127-164). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57.
Van PraetE. (2009). Staging a team performance. A linguistic ethnographic analysis of weekly meetings at a British embassy. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 80-99.
58.
Virkkula-RäisänenT. (2010). Linguistic repertoires and semiotic resources in interaction. A Finnish manager as a mediator in a multilingual meeting. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 505-531.
59.
WadensjöC. (1998). Interpreting as interaction. London, England: Longman.
60.
Wasson, (2000). Caution and consensus in American business meetings. Pragmatics, 10, 457-481.
61.
WinsladeJ.MonkG. (2008). Practicing narrative mediation: Loosening the grip of conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
YeungL. (2004a). The paradox of control in participative decision-making: Facilitative discourse in banks. Text, 24(1), 113-146.
63.
YeungL. (2004b). The paradox of control in participative decision-making: Gatekeeping discourse in banks. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 166, 83-104.
