Development of a New Reusable and User-Centric General-Use Mask for Averting Respirator Supply Crisis in the Healthcare Sector

Abstract

Healthcare workforce implements general-use masks for low and/or moderate barrier protection in sterile environments. However, these masks are often unavailable in pandemic situations due to a strain on supply/demand logistics. In such cases, establishing development of respiratory protection within the organization may be beneficial. Our work presents one such novel method of designing customized masks by considering facial anthropometrics of the specific sample population. In fact, such a design may provide a more efficient fit with the users as compared to currently available masks, which are often designed for a much wider range of people. The protocol followed a fast-paced method of obtaining facial data (~2.8 mins/participant), and a data-driven approach for extracting design profiles. We have demonstrated the same through a pilot study, which involved recruiting a group of 7 participants with ethnic and gender variation. A total of 7 landmarks representing zygomatic process of the temporal, angle of mandible, zygomatic arch, nasal-maxillary region, and apex of nose, mid-lips and the chin were selected. Analysis included determining closest, mid-points, and farthest points for each landmark among the entire datasets. Results indicated that the landmarks: Apex of Nose, Midlips and Chin represented a straight-line path with a lateral shift of ~4.58 inches between the closest and farthest dimensions from the nose point, based on which the facepiece was designed. Meanwhile, geometric transformations consisting of several construction lines and bisectors were used along with obtained data from zygomatic arch, process of temporal, and angle of mandible landmarks to determine the contours of the straps for securing the mask. Our design addresses common issues in masks like discomfort around the ear, humidity, and reuse, by provision of a novel mounting method, fabric-based materials, and sleeve for replacement of filters, respectively. The proposed concept of the mask and the methods followed could also be applied in broader applications including manufacturing/construction and also daily-life activities besides hospital environments.

Keywords

Design Ergonomics Anthropometry Respiratory Protection Mask Comfort Usability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bhattacharjee

Bahl

Chughtai

A. A.

Macintyre

C. R.

(2020). Last-resort strategies during mask shortages: optimal design features of cloth masks and decontamination of disposable masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ OPEN Respiratory Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000698

Chao

(2020). Face mask designs following novel Coronavirus. Journal of Public Health Research, 9, 31–35.

Chen

Wang

(2015). The human factors / ergonomics studies for respirators: a review and future work. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 51305077. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-06-2014-0077

Chen

Yang

Wang

Gong

(2016). Physiological and subjective responses to breathing resistance of N95 filtering facepiece respirators in still-sitting and walking. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 53, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.002

Chua

M. H.

Cheng

Goh

S. S.

Kong

Lim

J. Y. C.

Mao

Wang

Xue

Yang

Zhang

Chet

Cheong

Tan

B. H.

(2020). Review Article Face Masks in the New COVID-19 Normal: Materials , Testing , and Perspectives. AAAS, 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/7286735 Review

Fenlon

(2007). Facial Respirator Shape Analysis using 3D Anthropometric Data. In Nistir 7460.

Kuber

P. M.

Rashedi

(2021). Designing a New Forklift Backrest: Role of Adjustability in Improving Operator Comfort. Ergonomics in Design. https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211002378

Kuber

P. M.

Rashedi

(2020). Preparing Future Human Factors Engineers for Developing Ergonomic Products using Computer Aided Design and Prototyping. 2020 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference Proceedings, April, 220–221.

Lee

Yang

Jung

Park

Kim

You

(2018). Ergonomic evaluation of pilot oxygen mask designs. Applied Ergonomics, 67(October 2017), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.003

10.

Lorusso

Bruno

L’Abbate

(2007). A review of low back pain and musculoskeletal disorders among Italian nursing personnel. Industrial Health, 45(5), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.45.637

11.

O Kelly

Arora

Pirog

Ward

Clarkson

P. J

. (2021). Comparing the fit of N95, KN95, surgical, and cloth face masks and assessing the accuracy of fit checking. PLOS ONE, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245688

12.

Suen

L. K. P.

Guo

Y. P.

S. S. K.

Lam

S. C.

(2020). Comparing mask fit and usability of traditional and nanofibre N95 filtering facepiece respirators before and after nursing procedures. 104, 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.014

13.

Uniyal

(2020). VA-U: Addressing the gaps in respiratory protection through a holistic open-sourced design alternative. Rochester Institute of Technology.

14.

Zhuang

Landsittel

Benson

Roberge

Shaffer

(2010). Facial anthropometric differences among gender, ethnicity, and age groups. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 54(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq007