Mentoring literature is skewed towards positive experiences, and we have limited knowledge about negative mentoring experiences (NMEs) and the value such experiences bring to protégés. Hence, scholars have sought more research on the case of NMEs including their outcomes for protégés.
This qualitative study, conducted with 12 protégés in India, bridges the above gaps and makes significant contributions. First, it pioneers in informing us about the strategies adopted by protégés in handling NMEs and extends the literature by discovering relational outcomes from NMEs for protégés. Second, it suggests a new expanded model of mentoring, with dimensions beyond the classical phases of mentorship postulated by Kram (1985, Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organisational Life). Third, it extends the NME literature beyond the Western models and introduces Indian values in handling NMEs. This article suggests avenues for further research on the new models of mentoring and the applicability of Indian management principles in mentorship practice.
AgarwalaT. (2008). Mentoring relationships. In Strategic human resource management. Oxford University Press.
2.
AllenT. D., Eby L.T., O’Brien K.E., & LentzE. (2008). The state of mentoring research: A qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 73, 343–357.
3.
AllenT. D., PoteetM. L., & BurroughsS. M. (1997). The mentors’ perspective: A qualitative enquiry, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 51, 70–89.
4.
BarkemaH. G., ChenX. P., GeorgeG., LuoY., & TsuiA. S. (2015). West meets east: New concepts and theories. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 460–479.
5.
BecherA., & Orland-BarakL. (2018). Context matters: Contextual factors informing mentoring in art initial teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 477–492.
6.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
7.
ClutterbuckD. (2005). Establishing and maintaining mentoring relationships: An overview of mentor and mentee competencies, SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(3), 2–9.
8.
DashperK. (2019). Challenging the gendered rhetoric of success? The limitations of women-only mentoring for tackling gender inequality in the workplace. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(4), 541–557.
9.
DehejiaV., & SubramanyaR. (2012). Mythical or modern. In Indianomix: Making sense of modern India. Vintage Books.
10.
DeJongM. (2016). Tell us what you need. In Continued momentum: Teaching as mentoring. Hague: Sense Brill.
11.
DuckS. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Sage Publications, Inc.
12.
EbbeckM., & WaniganayakeM. (2003). Early childhood professionals: Learning today and tomorrow. MacLennan and Petty.
13.
EbyL. T., & AllenT. D. (2002). Further investigation of protégés’ negative mentoring experiences: Patterns and outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 27(4), 456–479.
14.
EbyL. T., ButtsM. M., DurleyJ., & RaginsB. R. (2010). Are bad experiences stronger than good ones in mentoring relationships? Evidence from the protégé and mentor perspective. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 77(1), 81–92.
15.
EbyL. T., & LockwoodA. (2005). Protégés and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 67, 441–458.
16.
EbyL. T., & McManusS. E. (2004). The protégés role in negative mentoring experiences. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 65, 255–275.
17.
EbyL. T., McManusS. E., SimonS. A., & RussellJ. E. (2000). The protégé’s perspective regarding negative mentoring experiences: The development of a taxonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(1), 1–21.
18.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Advances in the methodology of grounded theory: Theoretical sensitivity. University of California.
19.
GlaserB. & Strauss, A (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, Aldine Pub. Co.
20.
GopalanS., & StahlA. (1998). Application of American management theories and practices to the Indian business environment: Understanding the impact of national culture. American Business Review, 16(2), 30.
21.
GottmanJ. M., & KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47.
22.
HigginsM. C., & KramK. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264–288.
23.
HoltorfC. (2018). Embracing change: How cultural resilience is increased through cultural heritage. World Archaeology, 50(4), 639–650.
24.
HuZ., LiJ., & KwanH. K. (2022). The effects of negative mentoring experiences on mentor creativity: The roles of mentor ego depletion and traditionality. Human Resource Management, 61(1), 39–54.
25.
HuangC. Y., & WengR. H. (2017). Negative mentoring experience questionnaire design and testing. 19th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development, Melbourne: Book of Proceedings, 318.
26.
HurstC. S., & EbyL. T. (2012). Mentoring in organizations: Mentor or tormentor? In ReillyN. P., SirgyM. J., & GormanC. A. (Eds.), Work and quality of life: Ethical practices in organizations (pp. 81–94). Springer.
27.
IveyG. W., & DupréK. E. (2022). Workplace mentorship: A critical review. Journal of Career Development, 49(3), 714–729.
28.
JarvisP. (1994). Learning practical knowledge, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 18, 31–43.
29.
KarcherM. J., & HansenK. (2014). Mentoring activities and interactions. In Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 63–82). Sage Publications.
30.
KramK. (1996). A relational approach to career development. In HallD. T. (Ed.), The career is dead—long live the career: a relational approach to careers (pp. 132–157). Jossey-Bass.
31.
KramK. E. (1983). Phases of the mentoring relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625.
32.
KramK. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organisational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman as cited in Santos, J. C., Goulart, L. F., Giansante, L., Lin, Y. H., Sirico, A. C. A., Ng, A. H., & Ng, K. H. (2020). Leadership and mentoring in medical physics: The experience of a medical physics international mentoring program. Physica Medica, 76, 337–344.
33.
KumarP. (2018). Exploring incongruence in mentoring dyads in Indian firms: The protégé perspective. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 5(2), 216–233.
34.
KumarP., & Blake-BeardS. (2012). What good is bad mentorship? Protégé’s perception of negative mentoring experiences. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(1), 79–93.
35.
KumarP., & BudhwarP. (Eds.). (2020). Mentorship-driven talent management: The Asian experience. Emerald Publishing Limited.
36.
KumarP., & KumarS. (2018). Mentoring in a start-up company with millennium roots. In KumarP. (Ed.), Exploring dynamic mentoring models in India (pp. 49–65). Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
LapointeÉ., & VandenbergheC. (2017). Supervisory mentoring and employee affective commitment and turnover: The critical role of contextual factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 98–107.
38.
LevinsonD. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. Random House Digital, Inc.
39.
LockeE. A. (2007). The case for inductive theory building. Journal of Management, 33(6), 867–890.
40.
MannK. J., RoachK. N., & O’BrienK. E. (2023). Mentoring as an investment: A quantitative review of mentoring and well-being for the protégé. Journal of Career Development, 50(2), 465–481.
41.
MegginsonD., ClutterbuckD., GarveyB., StokesP., & Garrett-HarrisR. (2006). Mentoring in action: A practical guide. London: Kogan (p. 19).
42.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
43.
ModiN. (2020). Prime Minister’s address to nation, DD National, March20, 2020.
44.
MohapatraR. K., & GuptaA. (2021). India inspires: incarnations of a leader (lessons from Indian epic Gita Govinda). International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 22(2), 233–255.
45.
NahavandiA., & KrishnanH. A. (2017). Indo-European Leadership (IEL): A Non-Western Leadership Perspective. In Global and culturally diverse leaders and leadership: New dimensions and challenges for business, education and society (pp. 105–123). Emerald Publishing Limited.
46.
OlianJ. D., CarrollS. J., GiannantonioC. M., & FerenD. B. (1988). What do protégés look for in a mentor? Results of three experimental studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(88)90031-0
47.
RaginsB. R., CottonJ. L., & MillerJ. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177–1194.
48.
RaginsB. R., & ScanduraT. A. (1997). The way we were: Gender and the termination of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied psychology, 82(6), 945.
49.
RaginsB. R., & VerbosA. K. (2017). Positive relationships in action: Relational mentoring and mentoring schemas in the workplace. In Exploring positive relationships at work (pp. 91–116). Psychology Press.
50.
RainaM. K. (2002). Guru-shishya relationship in Indian culture: The possibility of a creative resilient framework. Psychology and Developing Societies, 14(1), 167–198.
51.
RaithelhuberE. (2018). How “godparents” are made for “unaccompanied refugee minors”: An ethnographic view into the training of future youth mentors. Child & Youth Services, 39(4), 250–283.
52.
RamaswamiA., & DreherG. F. (2010). Dynamics of mentoring relationships in India: A qualitative, exploratory study. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 501–530.
53.
RobnettR. D., NelsonP. A., ZurbriggenE. L., CrosbyF. J., & ChemersM. M. (2018). Research mentoring and scientist identity: Insights from undergraduates and their mentors. International Journal on STEM Education, 5(41). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0139-y
54.
SadeghiM. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80–88.
55.
ScanduraT. A. (1998). Dysfunctional mentoring relationships and outcomes. Journal of Management, 24(3), 449–467.
56.
SharmaJ. K. (2017). ‘Relevance of ancient Indian scriptures – business wisdom drawn from Ramayana, Gita and Thirukkural’. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 15(3), 278–298.
57.
SimonS. A., & EbyL. T. (2003). A typology of negative mentoring experiences: A multidimensional scaling study. Human Relations, 56(9), 1083–1106.
58.
SrikanthP. B., & JomonM. G. (2015). Perception of managerial competency needs: An Indian perspective. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 2(2),139–170.
59.
SsemataA. S., GladdingS., JohnC. C., & KiguliS. (2017). Developing mentorship in a resource-limited context: A qualitative research study of the experiences and perceptions of the Makerere University student and faculty mentorship programme. BMC Medical Education, 17(123). doi 10.1186/s12909-017-0962-8
60.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
61.
TumaT. T., AdamsJ. D., HultquistB. C., & DolanE. L. (2021). The dark side of development: A systems characterization of the negative mentoring experiences of doctoral students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(2), ar16.
62.
WashingtonR., & CoxE. (2016). How an evolution view of workplace mentoring relationships helps avoid negative experiences: The developmental relationship mentoring model in action. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(4), 318–340.
63.
Young IlliesM., & Reiter-PalmonR. (2020). The effect of perceived values on negative mentoring, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and perceived career success. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 18(1), 20–30.
