In the era of technology, along with friendly leader-member exchange (LMX), employees’ intrinsic work motivation (IWM) and technological turbulence (TT) as external factors are also associated with organisational innovation (OI). This study looks at the mediation effect of IWM and the moderation impact of TT between LMX and OI. The hypotheses were tested with data (N = 217) collected from the employees of various service and manufacturing firms using convenient and snowball sampling approaches. The result shows that IWM has full mediation and TT has no moderation influence on the association between LMX and OI. However, TT has a significant negative, moderated influence on the relationship between IWM and OI. While, TT has a significant negative, moderated influence on the relationship between IWM and OI. This study builds on social exchange theory and the resource-based view (RBV), demonstrating how LMX, reciprocity, and trust motivate employees to participate in OI. In practice, managers should be aware of TT in the presence of relevant internal constructs that substantially affect OI. This study concludes by highlighting its key limitations and pinpointing directions for future research.
AhmedA., KhuwajaF. M., BrohiN. A., OthmanI., & BinL. (2018). Organizational factors and organizational performance: A resource-based view and social exchange theory viewpoint. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(3), 579–599.
2.
AmabileT. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
3.
AmabileT. M., & PrattM. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
4.
AmabileT. M., ContiR., CoonH., LazenbyJ., & HerronM. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
5.
AmabileT. M., HillK. G., HennesseyB. A., & TigheE. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.66.5.950
6.
AndersonJ. C., & GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
7.
Appiah-AduK. (1998). Market orientation and performance: Empirical tests in a transition economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/096525498346685
8.
AradS., HansonM. A., & SchneiderR. J. (1997). A Framework for the study of relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00780.x
9.
BagozziR. P., & YiY. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
10.
BasuR., & GreenS. G. (1997). Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: an empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1559-1816.1997.tb00643.x
11.
BibiA., & AfsarB. (2018). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation, psychological empowerment, and creative process engagement. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business, PIEB, 18(1), 25–43.
12.
BockG.-W., NgW.-L., & ShinY. (2008). The effect of a perceived leader’s influence on the motivation of the members of nonwork-related virtual communities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.919679
13.
BrowneM. W., & CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
14.
CalantoneR., GarciaR., & DrögeC. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.2002003
15.
CerasoliC. P., NicklinJ. M., & FordM. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008
16.
ÇetinF., & AşkunD. (2018). The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation. Management Research Review, 41(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062
17.
ChavezR., YuW., JacobsM., FynesB., WiengartenF., & LecunaA. (2015). Internal lean practices and performance: The role of technological turbulence. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.005
18.
ChesbroughH. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
19.
ChoiJ., & ShimY. (2024). From adoption to innovation: State-dependent technology policy in developing countries(SSRN Scholarly Paper 4904572). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400283284.001
20.
ChowdhuryM. S., & KangD. (2022). Person–organization fit and occupation selection in Bangladesh: A study on Bangladesh Civil Service applicants. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 9(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 23220937221087022
21.
ChowdhuryM. S., MoniruzzamanH. M., LipyN. S., & KangD. (2023). Modeling corporate social responsibility and organizational attractiveness: The underlying mechanism of organizational trust. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-05-2021-0187
22.
CiborraC. U. (1996). The platform organization: recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. InAvgerouC., LanzaraG. F., & WillcocksL. P. (Eds.), Bricolage, care and information: Claudio Ciborra’s legacy in information systems research (pp. 134–158). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250611_7
23.
CrossanM. M., & ApaydinM. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
24.
CunhaM. P. E, RegoA., OliveiraP., RosadoP., & HabibN. (2014). Product innovation in resource-poor environments: Three research streams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12090
25.
DansereauF., GraenG., & HagaW. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
26.
De JesusS. N., RusC. L., LensW., & ImaginárioS. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: A meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752235
27.
DessG. G., & PickenJ. C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-8
28.
DuttaS., LanvinB., & Wunsch-VincentS. (2021). Global innovation index 2020: who will finance innovations. In Law and innovations (Issue 1 (33). https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2021-1(33)-1.
29.
FischerC., Malycha C.P., & SchafmannE. (2019). The influence of intrinsic motivation and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137
30.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
31.
FuN., FloodP. C., BosakJ., MorrisT., & O’ReganP. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms?Employee Relations, 37(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10- 2013-0155
32.
GassmannO. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. R & D Management, 36(3), 223–228.
33.
GraenG. B., & CashmanJ. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organization: A development approach. Leadership Frontier, 8, 143–165.
34.
GraenG. B., & CashmanJ. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 38, 46–78.
35.
GraenG. B., & ScanduraT. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
36.
GraenG. B., & Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
37.
GrantA. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
38.
GrantA. M., & BerryJ. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
39.
GrayD. B. J., GreenleyP. G. E., MatearD. S. M., & MathesonM. P. K. (1999). Thriving on turbulence. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4(3), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009827103329
40.
GreenleyG. E. (1995). Market orientation and company performance: Empirical evidence from UK companies. British Journal of Management, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1995.tb00082.x
41.
GumusluogluL., & IlsevA. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
42.
GundayG., UlusoyG., KilicK., & AlpkanL. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
43.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). Prentice Hall.
44.
HallB. H., & KhanB. (2003). Adoption of new technology[Working Paper 9730]. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9730
45.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
46.
HomansG. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms, Revised ed(pp. xi, 386). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
47.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
48.
HuqM. T., & IchihashiM. (2023). Prospective accelerating sectors to attain sustainable development in Bangladesh economy: Findings from a sectoral approach using input-output analysis. Sustainability, 15(3), 2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032651
49.
IsaksenS. G., & AkkermansH. J. (2011). Creative climate: A leadership lever for innovation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/j. 2162-6057.2011.tb01425.x
50.
JanssenO., van de VliertE., & WestM. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.242
51.
JooB.-K. (Brian), JeungC.-W., & YoonH. J. (2010). Investigating the influences of core self-evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in-role job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(4), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20053
52.
KandemirD., YaprakA., & CavusgilS. T. (2006). Alliance orientation: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305285953
53.
KanterR. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005001
54.
KanterR. M. (1996). Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Knowledge Management and Organisational Design. JAI Press.
55.
KassaA. G., & TsiguG. T. (2022). Corporate entrepreneurship, employee engagement and innovation: A resource-based view and a social exchange theory perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(6), 1694–1711.
56.
KhaliliA. (2018). Creativity and innovation through LMX and personal initiative. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0183
57.
KhengY. K., JuneS., & MahmoodR. (2013). The determinants of innovative work behavior in the knowledge intensive business services sector in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 47–59. http://dx.doi.org/ass.v9n15p47
58.
KohliA. K., & JaworskiB. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
59.
KumarK., SubramanianR., & YaugerC. (1998). Examining the market orientation-performance relationship: A context-specific study. Journal of Management, 24(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80060-9
60.
LiuD., JiangK., ShalleyC. E., KeemS., & ZhouJ. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001
61.
MacCallumR. C., BrowneM. W., & SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
62.
MartinsE. C., & TerblancheF. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456337
63.
MascareñoJ., RietzschelE., & WisseB. (2020). Leader‐member exchange (LMX) and innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(3), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12390
64.
MavondoF. T., ChimhanziJ., & StewartJ. (2005). Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. European Journal of Marketing, 39(11/12), 1235–1263. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510623244
65.
McGrawK. O., & FialaJ. (1982). Undermining the Zeigarnik effect: Another hidden cost of reward. Journal of Personality, 50(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494. 1982.tb00745.x
66.
McGrawK. O., & McCullersJ. C. (1979). Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(79)90039-8
67.
Mercer-BlackmanV., ForondaA. S., & MariasinghamM. (2017). Using input–output analysis framework to explain economic diversification and structural transformation in Bangladesh[SSRN Scholarly Paper 2982886]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2982886
68.
MollahM., ShinJ., & ChoiJ.-H. (2022). Effect of social media on organizational innovations through leader-member exchange: An organizational communication perspective. Korean Association of Industrial Business Administration, 37(4), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.22903/jbr.2022.37.4.107
69.
NunnallyJ. C., & BernsteinI. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.
70.
OldhamG. R., & CummingsA. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.5465/256657
71.
ParkS., & JoS. J. (2018). The impact of proactivity, leader-member exchange, and climate for innovation on innovative behavior in the Korean government sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2016-0216
72.
PierceJ. L., & DelbecqA. L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409154
73.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ.-Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0021-9010.88.5.879
74.
RoseG. M., & ShohamA. (2002). Export performance and market orientation: Establishing an empirical link. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00139-9
75.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
76.
SalamS., HafeezM., MahmoodM. T., & AkbarK. (2019). The dynamic relation between technology adoption, technology innovation, human capital and economy: Comparison of lower-middle-income countries. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 17(1–B), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.17.1.15
77.
ScottS. G., & BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
78.
ShalleyC. E., & GilsonL. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
79.
ShinS. J., & ZhouJ. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040662
80.
SlaterS. F., & NarverJ. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship?Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800104
81.
SparroweR. T., & LidenR. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522–552. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707154068
82.
SubramanianR., & GopalakrishnaP. (2001). The market orientation–performance relationship in the context of a developing economy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Research, 53(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00109-5
83.
TierneyP., FarmerS. M., & GraenG. B. (1999). an examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
84.
TrkmanP., & McCormackK. (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.002
85.
TruxilloD., BauerT., & ErdoganB. (2016). Psychology and work: Perspectives on industrial and organizational psychology. Routledge.
86.
TushmanM. L., & O’ReillyC. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
87.
UllahA., IqbalS., & ShamsS. M. R. (2020). Impact of CRM adoption on organizational performance: Moderating role of technological turbulence. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 30(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2019-0128
88.
UtterbackJ. M., & AfuahA. N. (1998). The dynamic ‘diamond’: A technological innovation perspective. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6(2–3), 183–200.
89.
VasaganV. T. (2022). Trend of gross domestic product and per capita income of Bangladesh: Past, present, and future. Talaa: Journal of Islamic Finance, 2(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.54045/talaa.v2i2.698
90.
Von HippelE. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal Für Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8
91.
WangC.-H., ChenK.-Y., & ChenS.-C. (2012). Total quality management, market orientation and hotel performance: The moderating effects of external environmental factors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.013
92.
WarrP., CookJ., & WallT. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1979.tb00448.x
93.
WayneS. J., ShoreL. M., & LidenR. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.5465/257021
94.
XerriM., BenF.-W., BrunettoY., CrossanF., & BeattieR. (2019). Comparing the impact of management on public and private nurses in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(7), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2019-0023
95.
YinH., IslamM. S., & JuM. (2021). Urban river pollution in the densely populated city of Dhaka, Bangladesh: Big picture and rehabilitation experience from other developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 129040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129040
96.
ZahoorN., & Al-TabbaaO. (2020). Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(2), 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101109
97.
ZhangZ., WaldmanD. A., & WangZ. (2012). A multilevel investigation of leader–member exchange, informal leader emergence, and individual and team performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 49–78.
98.
ZhouJ., & OldhamG. R. (2001). Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01044.x
99.
ZhouK. Z., GaoG. Y., YangZ., & ZhouN. (2005). Developing strategic orientation in China: Antecedents and consequences of market and innovation orientations. Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
