Workplaces today are more technologically pervasive than ever before, and communication devices such as smartphones have blurred traditional boundaries between work and non-work spheres of people. In fact, employers need to be mindful about this phenomenon when they have technology-based work expectations from their employees. Within this backdrop, this study attempts to reveal how the technological intensity at workplaces affects work–life conflict of employees who have different boundary preferences. The analysis based on 225 respondents shows that technological intensity is a significant mediator between work–life boundary preferences and work–life conflict of employees. Further, this study validates the findings of prior research based on Western samples on non-Western countries, followed by a discussion on the implications to practice and avenues for future research.
AdikaramA. S. (2018). Being sensitive to the culture: Challenges in researching sensitive topics in an Asian culture. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(3), 287–299. doi:10.1108/QRJ-D-17-0004.
2.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.
3.
AyentimiD. T.BurgessJ.DayaramK. (2017). Do multinational subsidiaries demonstrate a convergence across their HRM practices in a less developed host-country? Employee Relations, 39(7) , 1066–1082.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
5.
BeigiM.ShirmohammadiM. (2017). Qualitative research on work-family in the management field: A review. Applied Psychology, 66(3), 382–433. doi:doi:10.1111/apps.1209.
6.
BittmanM.BrownJ. E.WajcmanJ. (2009). The mobile phone, perpetual contact and time pressure. Work, Employment and Society, 23(4), 673–691. doi:10.1177/095001700934491.
7.
BoswellW. R.Olson-BuchananJ. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work–life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592–610.
8.
BulgerC. A.MatthewsR. A.HoffmanM. E. (2007). Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4), 365–375. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.36.
9.
ChenA.KarahannaE. (2014). Boundaryless technology: Understanding the effects of technology-mediated interruptions across the boundaries between work and personal life. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(2), 16–36.
10.
ChenF.CurranP. J.BollenK. A.KirbyJ.PaxtonP. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494.
11.
ChenZ.PowellG. N.GreenhausJ. H. (2009). Work-to-family conflict, positive spillover, and boundary management: A person-environment fit approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 82–93.
12.
ChesleyN. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1237–1248. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213..
13.
ClarkS. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770.
14.
CoxA. L.BirdJ.MauthnerN.DrayS.PetersA.CollinsE. (2014). Socio-technical practices and work-home boundaries. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices & services, Toronto, ON, Canada.
15.
DaviesO.RiachK. (2018). Sociomateriality and qualitative research: method, matter and meaning. In CassellC.CunliffeA. L.GrandyG. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: Methods and challenges (pp. 133–149). SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-business-and-management-research-methods-v2. doi:10.4135/978152643023.
16.
Department of Census and Statistics Sri Lanka. (2018). Computer literacy statistics—2018 (annual). Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.lk/education/ComputerLiteracy/Annual%20BuletinComputerLiteracy-2018.pdf
17.
DerksD.BakkerA. B.PetersP.van WingerdenP. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work–family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045–1068. doi:10.1177/001872671560189.
18.
DuxburyL.HigginsC.SmartR.StevensonM. (2014). Mobile technology and boundary permeability. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 570–588.
19.
DuxburyL.SmartR. (2011). The “myth of separate worlds”: An exploration of how mobile technology has redefined work-life balance. In KaiserS.RinglstetterM. J.EikhofD. R.Pina e CunhaM. (Eds.), Creating balance? International perspectives on the work-life integration of professionals (pp. 269–284). Springer.
20.
EbyL. T.CasperW. J.LockwoodA.BordeauxC.BrinleyA. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 124–197.
21.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.
22.
FenderC. M. (2010). Electronic tethering: Perpetual wireless connectivity to the organization. PhD thesis, Drexel University.
23.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
24.
GaskinJ.LimJ. (2017). CFA tool, AMOS plugin. Retrieved from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/index.php?title=Confirmatory_Factor_Analysis#Common_Method_Bias_.28CMB.29
25.
GhislieriC.EmanuelF.MolinoM.CorteseC. G.ColomboL. (2017). New technologies smart, or harm work-family boundaries management? Gender differences in conflict and enrichment using the JD-R theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1070. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0107.
26.
GoldenA. G.GeislerC. (2007). Work-life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations, 60(3), 519–551. doi:10.1177/001872670707669.
27.
GreenhausJ. H.BeutellN. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. doi:10.2307/25821.
28.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective: Pearson Education.
29.
HellemansC.FlandrinP.van de LeemputC. (2019). ICT use as mediator between job demands and work-life balance satisfaction. Paper presented at the HCI in business, government and organizations. Information systems and analytics, Cham.
30.
JayatillekeB. G.GunawardenaC. (2016). Cultural perceptions of online learning: transnational faculty perspectives. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 50–63. doi:10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-001.
31.
KailasapathyP.MetzI. (2012). Work-family conflict in Sri Lanka: Negotiations of exchange relationships in family and at work. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 790–813. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01776..
32.
KeeneyJ.BoydE. M.SinhaR.WestringA. F.RyanA. M. (2013). From “work-family” to “work-life”: Broadening our conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 221–237.
33.
KöfferS.AnlaufL.OrtbachK.NiehavesB. (2015). The intensified blurring of boundaries between work and private life through IT consumerisation. Paper presented at the. ECIS 2015 completed research papers.
34.
KreinerG. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485–507. doi:10.1002/job.38.
35.
KreinerG. E.HollensbeE. C.SheepM. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.4366991.
36.
LaiK.GreenS. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 220–239. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.113430.
37.
LapierreL. M.McMullanA. D. (2015). A review of methodological and measurement approaches to the study of work and family. In AllenT. D.EbyL. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family. Oxford University Press.
38.
LeeD.-J.SirgyM. J. (2019). Work-life balance in the digital workplace: The impact of schedule flexibility and telecommuting on work-life balance and overall life satisfaction. In CoetzeeM. (Ed.), Thriving in digital workspaces: Emerging issues for research and practice (pp. 355–384). Springer International Publishing.
39.
LeonardiP. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59–76.
40.
MarklandD. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851–858.
41.
MellnerC. (2016). After-hours availability expectations, work-related smartphone use during leisure, and psychological detachment: The moderating role of boundary control. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 9(2), 146–164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-07-2015-005.
42.
MiddletonC.ScheepersH.CukierW. (2005). Exploring the contradictions of mobility: A case study of BlackBerry users in Canada. In ThongJ. Y. L.TamK. Y. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Hong Kong mobility roundtable (pp. 299–309).
43.
MikalsenM. (2014). Methodological considerations in the study of sociomateriality. Paper presented at the European conference on information systems (ECIS), Tel Aviv, Israel.
44.
NamT. (2014). Technology use and work-life balance. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(4), 1017–1040. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9283-.
45.
NetemeyerR. G.BolesJ. S.McMurrianR. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400.
46.
Nippert-EngC. E. (1996). Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. University of Chicago Press.
47.
Ollier-MalaterreA.JacobsJ. A.RothbardN. P. (2019). Technology, work, and family: Digital cultural capital and boundary management. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 425–447. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-02243.
48.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. doi:10.1177/017084060708113.
49.
OrlikowskiW. J.ScottS. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. doi:10.1080/1941652080221164.
50.
ParkY.FritzC.JexS. M. (2011). Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: The role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 457.
51.
ParkY.JexS. M. (2011). Work-home boundary management using communication and information technology. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(2), 133.
52.
PiszczekM. M. (2017). Boundary control and controlled boundaries: Organizational expectations for technology use at the work–family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 592–611.
53.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
54.
PosterM. (1995). The second media age: Wiley.
55.
RoedingK.WeigelA.JahnK.NiehavesB. (2019). Individualized design: The role of individual boundary preferences on technology acceptance and work-life conflict. Paper presented at the Pacific Asia conference on information systems 2019, China.
56.
RothbardN. P.Ollier-MalaterreA. (2015). Boundary management. In AllenT. D.EbyL. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family. Oxford University Press.
57.
SaternusZ.StaabK.HinzO. (2019). Challenges for a smart availability assistant–availability preferences. Paper presented at the Americas conference on information systems (Amcis), Cancun.
58.
SchalowP. R.WinklerT.RepschlaegerJ.ZarnekowR. (2013). The blurring boundaries of work-related and personal media use: A grounded theory study on the employee’s perspective. ECIS 2013 proceedings (pp. Paper 212). Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
59.
Senarathne TennakoonK. L. U.da SilveiraG. J. C.TarasD. G. (2013). Drivers of context-specific ICT use across work and nonwork domains: A boundary theory perspective. Information and Organization, 23(2), 107–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.03.00.
60.
StonerC. R.StephensP.McGowanM. K. (2009). Connectivity and work dominance: Panacea or pariah. Business Horizons, 52(1), 67–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.08.00.
61.
Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka. (2019). Statistics 2019. Retrieved from http://www.trc.gov.lk/2014-05-13-03-56-46/statistics.html#home
62.
TennakoonU. S. (2018). Crossing the work/life boundary with ICT: Moderating effect of ICT perception on the relationship between cross-domain ICT use and work/life conflict. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 5(2), 194–215.
63.
VirickM.LillyJ. D.CasperW. J. (2007). Doing more with less: An analysis of work life balance among layoff survivors. Career Development International, 12(5), 463–480.
YeowJ. (2014). Boundary management in an ICT-enabled project-based organising context. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(3), 237–252.
66.
YuS. (2014). Work–life balance – Work intensification and job insecurity as job stressors. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 24(3), 203–216. doi:10.1080/10301763.2014.96168.
67.
YunH.KettingerW. J.LeeC. C. (2012). A new open door: the smartphone’s impact on work-to-life conflict, stress, and resistance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(4), 121–152.
68.
ZerubavelE. (1991). The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. Free Press.
