This article analyses the environmental politics of Hindu nationalism in India after 2014, which is deeply enmeshed with aggressive nationalism. Taking as its case study articles, newspaper reports and visuals published in the Organiser, a leading magazine of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), it focuses on four ubiquitous environmental themes—imagination of a great Hindu motherland; icons of mother embodied in river and animal; climate change and renewable energy and the idealization of Prime Minister Modi as an environmental saviour—that are visible in its pages. Through these themes, India is projected as a great ancient ecological Hindu nation while hatred and violence are directed against ‘polluted’ Muslims. The ascendancy of Hindu nationalists to power since 2014 has indeed resulted in radical changes which have signalled multiple governmental ‘green’ initiatives and brought climate change and renewable energy to the centre stage. However, and as this article illustrates, these are couched in an optic of purity and pollution, as well as caste and religion, on the one hand, and mobilization of corporations and mega ‘clean’ industrial projects, on the other, which are propagated in the name of people, development and environment.
FrawleyD. (2019, Feburary24). Future Bharat. Organiser, pp. 21–22.
13.
ForchtnerB. (Ed.). (2019a). The far right and the environment. Routledge.
14.
ForchtnerB. (2019b). Nation, nature, purity: Extreme-right biodiversity in Germany. Patterns of Prejudice, 53(9), 285–301.
15.
GopalakrishnanS. (2006). Defining, constructing and policing a ‘New India’: Relationship between neoliberalism and Hindutva. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(26), 2810–2813.
16.
GrewalI., & KaplanC. (Eds.). (1994). Scattered hegemonies: Postmodernity and transnational feminist practices. University of Minnesota Press.
17.
GudavarthyA. (2019). India after Modi: Populism and the right. Bloomsbury.
18.
GuptaC. (2001). The icon of mother in late colonial North India: ‘Bharat Mata,’ ‘Matri Bhasha’ and ‘Gau Mata.’Economic and Political Weekly, 36(45), 4291–4299.
19.
HarrisM. (1966). The cultural ecology of India’s sacred cattle. Current Anthropology, 7(1), 51–66.
20.
JainK. (2021). Gods in the time of democracy. Duke University Press.
KaurR. (2007). Spectacles of nationalism in the Ganapati Utsav of Maharashtra. In DavisR. (Ed.), Picturing the nation: Iconographies of modern India (pp. 206–241). Orient Longman.
23.
KaurR. (2020). Brand new nation: Capitalist dreams and nationalist designs in twenty-first-century India. Stanford University Press.
24.
KumarP. (2015, March8). A return to India’s glorious scientific past. Organiser, pp. 22–23.
25.
KumarP. (2017, February26). Turning the tide. Organiser, pp. 24–27.
26.
MalmA., & the Zetkin Collective. (2021). White skin, black fuel. Verso.
27.
ManekarS. (2017, May23). Confluence in science. Organiser, pp. 34–35.
28.
MawdsleyE. (2005). The abuse of religion and ecology: The Vishva Hindu Parishad and Tehri Dam. Worldviews, 9(1), 1–24.
29.
McCrightA. M., & DunlopR. E. (2011). The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172.
30.
MisraN. (2019, February24). The mother of all rivers. Organiser, pp. 43–45.
31.
MuralivallabhanTV. (2016, April10). Sustainable Development Mantra. Organiser, pp. 56–57.
32.
NairR. J., & DanielF. J. (2015). Battling for India’s soul, state by state. Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-rss-specialreport/special-report-battling-for-indias-soul-state-by-state-idUSKCN0S700A20151013
33.
OlsenJ. (1999). Nature and nationalism: Right-wing ecology and the politics of identity in contemporary India. Macmillan.
34.
OmarM. (2021). The Muslim ‘Threat’ in right wing narratives: A critical discourse analysis. SSAI Working Paper Series. https://www.soas.ac.uk/south-asia-institute/publications/working-papers/file152729.pdf
OswaldM. T., FrommM., & BrodaE. (2021). Strategic clustering in right-wing-populism? ‘Green policies’ in Germany and France. Zeitschirft für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15, 185–205.
37.
PinneyC. (1997). The nation (un)pictured? Chromolithography and “popular” politics in India, 1878–1995. Critical Inquiry, 23(4), 834–867.
38.
RamaswamyS. (2001). Maps and mother goddesses in modern India. Imago Mundi, 53, 97–114.
39.
RangarajanS. V. (2016). Bharat Mata Ki Jai: Bharat as the ‘Motherland.’Organiser, May1, 22–23.
40.
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. (1988). Desh ki Chinta. RSS.
41.
SarkarT. (1991). The woman as communal subject: Rashtrasevika Samiti and Ram Janmabhoomi Movement. Economic and Political Weekly, 26(35), 2057–2062.
42.
SharmaI. (2018). Cow as a sacred national symbol: (Un)Making of the idea of India. Unpublished manuscript.
43.
SharmaM. (2001). Nature and Nationalism. Frontline, pp. 94–96. https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30249823.ece
44.
SharmaM. (2012). Green and Saffron: Hindu nationalism and Indian environmental politics. Permanent Black.
45.
ShuklaS. P. (2018, March18). Being Hindu: Bonded naturally. Organiser, pp. 59–61.
46.
SinghS. (2016, July31). The electrifying effect. Organiser, pp. 24–26.
47.
SirohiS. (2017, April30). Hey Gange. Organiser, pp. 42–43.
48.
TurnerJ., & BaileyD. (2021). ‘Ecobordering’: Casting immigration control as environmental protection. Environmental Politics, 31(1), 110–131. 10.1080/09644016.2021.1916197
49.
VaidyarajP. (2018, April19). Decolonising the village ecosystem, Organiser, pp. 72–73.
50.
VeerP. van der. (1994). Religious nationalism: Hindus and Muslims in India. University of California Press.
51.
WodakR. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
52.
YangA. A. (1980). Sacred symbol and sacred space in rural India: Community mobilization in the “anti-cow killing” riot of 1893. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(4), 576–596.
