In the first half of 2020, primary and secondary school teaching was transformed into online teaching in China, and the teaching effects have attracted considerable attention. This article collects relevant data on the effects of online learning among primary and middle school students through questionnaire surveys to study the impact of parents and teachers on learning effects, provide an experience for future online education and improve the quality of online education for primary and secondary school students in the future. Through empirical analysis, this article draws three main conclusions. First, parents improve students’ offline social presence, while teachers or classmates improve their online presence. Both changes have a significant positive impact on students’ subjective learning effects. Second, parents are more helpful with regard to the improvement of students’ objective learning effects. Third, in terms of age, parents have a greater influence on younger students. The innovation of this article is that the object of the study is primary and secondary school students. The article considers not only the role of teachers but also the role of parents, thereby filling gaps in the previous literature.
AndelS. A., de VreedeT., SpectorP. E., PadmanabhanB., SinghV. K., & de VreedeG.-J. (2020). Do social features help in video-centric online learning platforms? A presence perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106505
2.
Agudo-PeregrinaÁ. F., Iglesias-PradasS., Conde-GonzálezM. Á., & Hernández-GarcíaA. (2014). Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 542–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.031
3.
BrinsonJ. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers and Education, 87, 218–237.
ChenC., & GuX. (2017). Does the internet expand the inequality of education outcome: An empirical study based on the programme for international student assessment (In Chinese). Peking University Education Review, 15(1), 140–153.
6.
DasguptaU., JhaC. K., & SarangiS. (2020). Procedural rationality in the time of COVID-19. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(25). https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/25/commentary/procedural-rationality-time-covid-19.html
7.
DasguptaU., JhaC. K., & SarangiS. (2021). Persistent patterns of behavior: Two infectious disease outbreaks 350 years apart. Economic Inquiry, 59(2), 848–857.
8.
De WeverB., Van KeerH., SchellensT., & ValckeM. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516–523.
9.
DuVallJ. B., PowellM. R., HodgeE., & EllisM. (2007). Text messaging to improve social presence in online learning. Educause Quarterly, 30(3), 24.
10.
FioreL., & RattiG. (2007). Remote laboratory and animal behavior: An interactive open field system. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1299–1307.
11.
HadwinA., JärveläS., & MillerM. (2017) Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. InSchunkD. & GreeneJ.(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). Routledge.
12.
HamiltonL. A., SudaK. J., HeidelR. E., McDonoughS. L. K., HuntM. E., & FranksA. S. (2020). The role of online learning in pharmacy education: A nationwide survey of student pharmacists. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 26(1), 614–625.
13.
HasanN., & BaoY. (2020). Impact of ‘e-learning crack-up’ perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of ‘fear of academic year loss’. Children and Youth Services Review, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355
14.
HeradioR., De La TorreL., GalanD., CabrerizoF. J., Herrera-ViedmaE., & DormidoS. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers and Education, 98, 14–38.
15.
HirumiA. (2002). A framework for analyzing, designing, and sequencing planned e-learning interactions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 141–60.
16.
HomerB. D., PlassJ. L., & BlakeL. (2008). The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 786–797.
17.
HuangR., ZhangM., ShenY, TianY, & ZengH. (2020). Research on the core elements of running a huge scale of cyber-learning: A case study of “disrupted class, undisrupted learning” supported effectively by online education (In Chinese). E-education Research, 41(03), 10–19.
18.
KuoY. C., WalkerA. E., SchroderK. E. E., & BellandB. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.
19.
LangD., MengelkampC., JaegerR. S., GeoffroyD., BillaudM., & ZimmerT. (2007). Pedagogical evaluation of remote laboratories in eMerge project. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 57–72.
20.
Littenberg-TobiasJ., & ReichJ. (2020). Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100759
21.
LowenthalP. R. (2009). Encyclopedia of distance learning. IGI Global.
22.
LyonsA., ReysenS., & PierceL. (2012). Video lecture format, student technological efficacy, and social presence in online courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 181–186.
23.
MooreM. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.
24.
OffirB., BarthI., LevY., & ShteinbokA. (2003). Teacher-student interactions and learning outcomes in a distance learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 65–75.
25.
RichardsonJ. C., & LowenthalP. (2017). Instructor social presence: a neglected component of the community of inquiry (Vol. 2, p. 531). The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education. ‘Carol I’ National Defence University.
26.
RichardsonJ., & SwanK. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.
27.
RichardsonJ. C., MaedaY., LvJ., & CaskurluS. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417.
28.
RobinsonJ., ManturukK., Çetinkaya-RundelM., & CanelasD. (2018). Analysis of adult learner sense of community in online classes. Digital Universities: International Best Practices and Applications, (1–2), 163. https://digitaluniversities.guideassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/DU_2018_1_2_14_Canelas.pdf
29.
RusliR., RahmanA., & AbdullahH. (2020). Student perception data on online learning using heutagogy approach in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. Data in Brief, 29, 105152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105152
30.
SkadbergY. X., & KimmelJ. R. (2004). Visitors’ flow experience while browsing a web site: Its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(3), 403–422.
31.
StickneyL. T., BentoR. F., AggarwalA., & AdlakhaV. (2019). Online higher education: Faculty satisfaction and its antecedents. Journal of Management Education, 43(5), 509–542.
32.
SueyoshiA., & HardisonD. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661–699.
33.
ValenzenoL., AlibaliM. W., & KlatzkyR. (2003). Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 187–204.
34.
van GogT., & ScheiterK. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009
35.
van GogT., VerveerI., & VerveerL. (2014). Learning from video modeling examples: Effects of seeing the human model’s face. Computers and Education, 72, 323–327.
36.
WangZ. (2020). How should education be transformed into the post-pandemic era?E-education Research, 41(04), 13–20. In Chinese.
37.
XieY., QiuY., HuangY, & WangQ (2020). Characteristics, problems and innovations of online teaching of “no suspension of classes” during the period of pandemic prevention and control. E-education Research, 41(3), 20–28. In Chinese.
38.
YorkC. S., & RichardsonJ. C. (2012). Interpersonal interaction in online learning: Experienced online instructors’ perceptions of influencing factors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 83–98.
