Increased demands to lower carbon emissions and conserve natural resources have heightened attention on circular supply chains (CSCs). This article aims to examine how digitalization improves the effectiveness of CSCs. It systematically employs the scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR 4–SLR) and the POWER frameworks. Following the framework protocol, 60 peer-reviewed articles from the Scopus database were included for a detailed review. Four overarching themes emerged: (a) the use of digital technologies such as IoT, blockchain, AI and big data to optimize CSC processes; (b) key industries adopting circular economy (CE) principles; (c) links between CSC innovations and some Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); and (d) measurable impacts on operational, environmental and economic performance. Notably, digital technologies enhance traceability, resource efficiency and stakeholder collaboration within CSCs. Industries such as manufacturing, electronics and motor vehicles lead in practising CE. Theoretically, this contributes systematic insights into how digital transformation influences CSC performance. Practically, it provides policymakers and practitioners with insights to develop digital strategies aligned with sustainability objectives to advance the SDGs.
Abolfazl MostafaviM., Rabiei-DastjerdiH., & ZamanA. (2022). Waste management 4.0: An application of a machine learning model to identify and measure household waste contamination: A case study in Australia. Sustainability, 14(5), 3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14053061
2.
AdaN., KazancogluY., SezerM. D., Ede-SenturkC., OzerI., & RamM. (2021). Analyzing barriers of circular food supply chains and proposing industry 4.0 solutions. Sustainability, 13(12), 6812. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13126812
3.
AgrawalR., WankhedeV. A., KumarA., UpadhyayA., & Garza-ReyesJ. A. (2021). Nexus of circular economy and sustainable business performance in the era of digitalization. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0676
4.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
5.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0076477
6.
AldrighettiR., BattiniD., DasA., & SimonettoM. (2023). The performance impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on closed-loop supply chains: Insights from an Italy based survey. International Journal of Production Research, 61(9), 3004–3029.
7.
Amoozad MahdirajiH., YaftiyanF., Abbasi-KamardiA., & Garza-ReyesJ. A. (2022). Investigating potential interventions on disruptive impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies in circular supply chains: Evidence from SMEs of an emerging economy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 174, 108753. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2022.108753
8.
AnastasiadisF., ManikasI., ApostolidouI., & WahbehS. (2022). The role of traceability in end-to-end circular agri-food supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2022.04.021
9.
BagS., & PretoriusJ. H. C. (2022). Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: Proposal of a research framework. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4), 864–898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2120/FULL/PDF
10.
BagS., & RahmanM. S. (2024). Navigating circular economy: Unleashing the potential of political and supply chain analytics skills among top supply chain executives for environmental orientation, regenerative supply chain practices, and supply chain viability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 504–528.
11.
BagS., SrivastavaG., CherrafiA., AliA., & SinghR. K. (2024). Data-driven insights for circular and sustainable food supply chains: An empirical exploration of big data and predictive analytics in enhancing social sustainability performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1369–1396. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.3554
12.
BarallaG., PinnaA., TonelliR., & MarchesiM. (2023). Waste management: A comprehensive state of the art about the rise of blockchain technology. Computers in Industry, 145, 103812.
13.
BeraI., ModgilS., ShrivastavaA. K., SinghR. K., & SharmaR. (2025). Data-driven sustainability: Advancing supply chain pricing models in B2B. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-025-00521-0
14.
CentobelliP., CerchioneR., EspositoE., PassaroR., & Shashi. (2021). Determinants of the transition towards circular economy in SMEs: A sustainable supply chain management perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 242, 108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2021.108297
15.
ChauhanC., ParidaV., & DhirA. (2022). Linking circular economy and digitalisation technologies: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121508. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121508
16.
ChoiT. M., & ChenY. (2021). Circular supply chain management with large scale group decision making in the big data era: The macro-micro model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120791.
17.
ClarC., & SteurerR. (2018). Why popular support tools on climate change adaptation have difficulties in reaching local policy-makers: Qualitative insights from the UK and Germany. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/EET.1802
18.
CorsiniF., GusmerottiN. M., & FreyM. (2023). Fostering the circular economy with blockchain technology: Insights from a bibliometric approach. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(4), 1819–1839.
19.
Cortes-MurciaD. L., GuerreroW. J., & Montoya-TorresJ. R. (2022). Supply chain management, game-changing technologies, and physical internet: A systematic meta-review of literature. IEEE Access, 10, 61721–61743.
20.
DavisF. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). https://doi.org/oclc/56932490
21.
de Camargo FioriniP., Roman Pais SelesB. M., Chiappetta JabbourC. J., Barberio MarianoE., & de Sousa JabbourA. B. L. (2018). Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.005
22.
De GiovanniP. (2022). Leveraging the circular economy with a closed-loop supply chain and a reverse omnichannel using blockchain technology and incentives. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(7), 959–994.
23.
Del GiudiceM., ChiericiR., MazzucchelliA., & FianoF. (2021). Supply chain management in the era of circular economy: The moderating effect of big data. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 337–356.
24.
DevN. K., ShankarR., & QaiserF. H. (2020). Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Operational excellence for sustainable reverse supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104583. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.104583
25.
DingS., TukkerA., & WardH. (2023). Opportunities and risks of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for circular business models: A literature review. Journal of environmental management, 336, 117662.
26.
DixitV. K., MalviyaR. K., KumarV., & ShankarR. (2024). An analysis of the strategies for overcoming digital supply chain implementation barriers. Decision Analytics Journal, 10, 100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DAJOUR.2023.100389
27.
DonthuN., KumarS., MukherjeeD., PandeyN., & LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070
28.
FangM., YuY., ParkK., LiuF., XiaoS. S., & ShiY. (2024). Supply chain relationship dependencies and circular economy performance: The contingency role of digitalization capability. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 30(4), 100902.
29.
FormentiniM., SecondiL., RuiniL., GuidiM., & PrincipatoL. (2022). Enablers and barriers to circular supply chain management: A decision-support tool in soft wheat bread production. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(3), 796–816.
30.
GiovanardiM., KonstantinouT., PolloR., & KleinT. (2023). Internet of Things for building façade traceability: A theoretical framework to enable circular economy through life-cycle information flows. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135261.
31.
GongY., XieS., ArunachalamD., DuanJ., & LuoJ. (2022). Blockchain-based recycling and its impact on recycling performance: A network theory perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(8), 3717–3741. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.3028
32.
GovindanK. (2022). Tunneling the barriers of blockchain technology in remanufacturing for achieving sustainable development goals: A circular manufacturing perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(8), 3769–3785. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.3031
33.
HerjantoH., AminM., & KarmagatriM. (2023). A systematic review on halal cosmetic consumption: Application of theory method context–attributes decision outcome framework. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 148–163.
34.
HettiarachchiB. D., SeuringS., & BrandenburgM. (2022). Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: A bibliometric analysis. Operations Management Research, 15(3), 858–878.
35.
HuynhP. H. (2022). Enabling circular business models in the fashion industry: The role of digital innovation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 870–895. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0683/FULL/PDF
36.
IqbalM. W., & KangY. (2024). Circular economy of food: A secondary supply chain model on food waste management incorporating IoT based technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140566. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.140566
37.
IslamM. T., Iyer-RanigaU., & TrewickS. (2022). Recycling perspectives of circular business models: A review. Recycling, 7(5), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/RECYCLING7050079/S1
38.
Jum’aL., IkramM., & Jose Chiappetta JabbourC. (2024). Towards circular economy: A IoT enabled framework for circular supply chain integration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 192, 110194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2024.110194
39.
KhanS. A. R., Zia-ul-haqH. M., UmarM., & YuZ. (2021). Digital technology and circular economy practices: An strategy to improve organizational performance. Business Strategy & Development, 4(4), 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSD2.176
40.
KiranF., & SahinB. (2024). Circular supply chain practices, big data implementation and firm performance: Mediating role of digital technology. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 90(1), e12290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ISD2.12290
41.
KouhizadehM., ZhuQ., & SarkisJ. (2022). Circular economy performance measurements and blockchain technology: an examination of relationships. International Journal of Logistics Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2022-0145/FULL/PDF
42.
KrausS., BreierM., LimW. M., DabićM., KumarS., KanbachD., MukherjeeD., CorvelloV., Piñeiro-ChousaJ., LiguoriE., Palacios-MarquésD., SchiavoneF., FerrarisA., FernandesC., & FerreiraJ. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11846-022-00588-8
43.
KrstićM., AgnusdeiG. P., MigliettaP. P., & TadićS. (2022). Evaluation of the smart reverse logistics development scenarios using a novel MCDM model. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 7, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CESYS.2022.100099
44.
KumarS., RautR. D., NayalK., KrausS., YadavV. S., & NarkhedeB. E. (2021). To identify industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM-ANP. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.126023
45.
KumarA., ShrivastavS. K., ShrivastavaA. K., PanigrahiR. R., MardaniA., & CavallaroF. (2023). Sustainable supply chain management, performance measurement, and management: A review. Sustainability, 15(6), 5290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065290
46.
LeT. T. (2023). Linking big data, sustainable supply chain management and corporate performance: The moderating role of circular economy thinking. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(3), 744–771.
47.
Leal FilhoW., MorganE. A., GodoyE. S., AzeiteiroU. M., Bacelar-NicolauP., Veiga ÁvilaL., Mac-LeanC., & HugéJ. (2018). Implementing climate change research at universities: Barriers, potential and actions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.09.105
48.
LiuJ., QuddoosM. U., AkhtarM. H., AminM. S., TariqM., & LamarA. (2022). Digital technologies and circular economy in supply chain management: In the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Operations Management Research, 15(1), 326–341.
49.
MathaR., MukherjeeS., PanigrahiR. R., & ShrivastavaA. K. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of industry 5.0 and healthcare supply chain research: Emerging opportunities and future challenges. Supply Chain Analytics, 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100125
50.
MeierO., GruchmannT., & IvanovD. (2023). Circular supply chain management with blockchain technology: A dynamic capabilities view. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 176, 103177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRE.2023.103177
51.
MishraR., SinghR., & GovindanK. (2022). Net-zero economy research in the field of supply chain management: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2022-0016
52.
MishraV., & MishraM. P. (2023). Prisma for review of management literature: Method, merits, and limitations—An academic review. Review of Management Literature, 2, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2754-586520230000002007/FULL/EPUB
53.
MoherD., LiberatiA., TetzlaffJ., AltmanD. G., AltmanD., AntesG., AtkinsD., BarbourV., BarrowmanN., BerlinJ. A., ClarkJ., ClarkeM., CookD., D’AmicoR., DeeksJ. J., DevereauxP. J., DickersinK., EggerM., ErnstE., … TugwellP. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The Prisma statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135/SUPPL_FILE/PRISMA_FIGURE-S1.DOC
54.
MoherD., ShamseerL., ClarkeM., GhersiD., LiberatiA., PetticrewM., ShekelleP., StewartL. A., EstarliM., BarreraE. S. A., Martínez-RodríguezR., BaladiaE., AgüeroS. D., CamachoS., BuhringK., Herrero-LópezA., Gil-GonzálezD. M., AltmanD. G., BoothA., … WhitlockE. (2016). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica, 20(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1/TABLES/4
55.
MukherjeeD., LimW. M., KumarS., & DonthuN. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2022.04.042
56.
MukherjeeS., PanigrahiR. R., SharmaR., & ShrivastavaA. K. (2025). Advancing circular economy performance through blockchain adoption: A study using institutional and resource-based frameworks. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100521
57.
NandiS., HervaniA. A., HelmsM. M., & SarkisJ. (2023). Conceptualising circular economy performance with non-traditional valuation methods: Lessons for a post-pandemic recovery. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 26(6), 662–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1974365
58.
NayalK., KumarS., RautR. D., QueirozM. M., PriyadarshineeP., & NarkhedeB. E. (2022). Supply chain firm performance in circular economy and digital era to achieve sustainable development goals. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1058–1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2935
59.
NiksereshtA., GolmohammadiD., & ZandiehM. (2024). Sustainable green logistics and remanufacturing: A bibliometric analysis and future research directions. International Journal of Logistics Management, 35(3), 755–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2023-0085/FULL/PDF
60.
OkorieO., RussellJ., CherringtonR., FisherO., & CharnleyF. (2023). Digital transformation and the circular economy: Creating a competitive advantage from the transition towards net zero manufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 189, 106756. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.106756
61.
OkorieO., RussellJ., JinY., TurnerC., WangY., & CharnleyF. (2022). Removing barriers to blockchain use in circular food supply chains: Practitioner views on achieving operational effectiveness. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 5, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSCN.2022.100087
62.
OwenG. (2020). What makes climate change adaptation effective? A systematic review of the literature. Global Environmental Change, 62, 102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2020.102071
63.
PaksereshtA., YavariA., KalijiS. A., & HakeliusK. (2023). The intersection of blockchain technology and circular economy in the agri-food sector. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 260–274.
64.
PanigrahiR. R., JenaD., MeherJ. R., & ShrivastavaA. K. (2023). Assessing the impact of supply chain agility on operational performances-a PLS-SEM approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 27(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2021-0073
65.
PanigrahiR. R., & ShrivastavaA. K. (2025). Inventory automation and sustainable supply chain performances: a systematic review on emerging countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06978-8
66.
PanigrahiR. R., ShrivastavaA. K., SarkarB. D., & KaliyanM. (2025). Inventory knowledge, industry 5.0 and performances: Review and future research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70002
67.
PatilA., DwivediA., Abdul MoktadirM., & Lakshay. (2023). Big data-industry 4.0 readiness factors for sustainable supply chain management: Towards circularity. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 178, 109109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2023.109109
68.
PerçinS. (2022). Evaluating the circular economy–based big data analytics capabilities of circular agri-food supply chains: The context of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(55), 83220–83233.
69.
PfajfarG., MitręgaM., & ShohamA. (2024). Systematic review of international marketing capabilities in dynamic capabilities view: Calibrating research on international dynamic marketing capabilities. International Marketing Review, 41(1), 237–272.
70.
PrasharA., & ChaudhuriA. (2025). Digitalization for circular economy and operational excellence practices: A paradox theory perspective on performance improvement in manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 1154–1170. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.4031
71.
RamanR., SreenivasanA., MaS., PatwardhanA., & NedungadiP. (2023). Green supply chain management research trends and linkages to UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 15(22), 15848.
72.
RanaJ., DaultaniY., GoswamiM., & KumarS. (2025). Exploring the impact of supply chain digital transformation on supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 3497–3521.
73.
RanaS., KathuriaS., & SinghJ. (2022). Presenting the POWER framework of conducting literature review. Review of management literature, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2754-586520220000001001
74.
RanaS., SinghJ., & KathuriaS. (2023). Parameters and decision elements of writing effective literature review papers: Empirical evidence from multiple stakeholders on power framework. Review of Management Literature, 2, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2754-586520230000002001
75.
RejebA., & AppolloniA. (2022). The nexus of industry 4.0 and circular procurement: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Sustainability, 14(23), 15633.
76.
RiggsR., RoldánJ. L., RealJ. C., & FelipeC. M. (2023). Opening the black box of big data sustainable value creation: The mediating role of supply chain management capabilities and circular economy practices. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53(7/8), 762–788.
77.
RogersE. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. InDie diffusion von innovationen in der Telekommunikation (pp. 25–38). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79868-9_2
78.
RomagnoliS., TarabuC., Maleki VishkaeiB., & De GiovanniP. (2023). The impact of digital technologies and sustainable practices on circular supply chain management. Logistics, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/LOGISTICS7010001
79.
SahuA., AgrawalS., & KumarG. (2022). Integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy: A review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(3), 885–917.
80.
SamadhiyaA., AgrawalR., KumarA., & Garza-ReyesJ. A. (2023). Blockchain technology and circular economy in the environment of total productive maintenance: A natural resource-based view perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(2), 293–314.
81.
Sánchez-GarcíaE., Martínez-FalcóJ., Marco-LajaraB., & Manresa-MarhuendaE. (2024). Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: A new era of sustainable progress. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 33, 103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ETI.2023.103509
82.
SchmidtJ. L., SehnemS., & SpuldaroJ. D. (2024). Blockchain and the transition to the circular economy: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2010–2032. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2674
83.
SchögglJ. P., RuschM., StumpfL., & BaumgartnerR. J. (2023). Implementation of digital technologies for a circular economy and sustainability management in the manufacturing sector. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2022.11.012
84.
ShangC., SaeidiP., & GohC. F. (2022). Evaluation of circular supply chains barriers in the era of Industry 4.0 transition using an extended decision-making approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(4–5), 1100–1128.
85.
SinghR. K. (2025). Exploring the impact of green supply chain strategies and sustainable practices on circular supply chains. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(4), 1387–1409.
86.
SinghR. K., MathiyazhaganK., ScuottoV., & PirontiM. (2024). Green open innovation and circular economy: Investigating the role of big data management and sustainable supply chain. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 8417–8429.
87.
TaddeiE., SassanelliC., RosaP., & TerziS. (2022). Circular supply chains in the era of industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 170, 108268.
88.
TamF. Y., & LungJ. W. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 and innovative ideas for a sustainable fashion supply chain in the future. Foresight, 25(2), 225–248.
89.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
90.
TrivediS. D., TaparA. V., & DharmaniP. (2024). A systematic literature review of the relationship between consumer ethnocentrism and product evaluation. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 36(1), 41–61.
91.
TsengM. L., HaH. M., TranT. P. T., BuiT. D., ChenC. C., & LinC. W. (2022). Building a data‐driven circular supply chain hierarchical structure: Resource recovery implementation drives circular business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2082–2106.
92.
VenkateshV., MorrisM. G., DavisG. B., & DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
93.
WangL., ZhangJ., LiJ., YuH., & LiJ. (2023). An ISM-DEMATEL analysis of blockchain adoption decision in the circular supply chain finance context. Management Decision. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2023-0302/FULL/XML
94.
WeberG.-W., Babaee TirkolaeeE., GoliA., Samar AliS., & Khusro ChishtyS. (2023). Economic and environmental efficiencies of organizations: Role of technological advancements and circular economy practices. Sustainability, 15(22), 15935. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU152215935
95.
WohlinC., RunesonP., HöstM., OhlssonM. C., RegnellB., & WesslénA. (2012). Systematic literature reviews. Experimentation in Software Engineering, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2_4
96.
XinL., LangS., & MishraA. R. (2022). Evaluate the challenges of sustainable supply chain 4.0 implementation under the circular economy concept using new decision making approach. Operations Management Research, 15(3), 773–792.
97.
YuZ., KhanS. A. R., & UmarM. (2022). Circular economy practices and industry 4.0 technologies: A strategic move of automobile industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2918
98.
ZaidM., & FarooqiR. (2024). Exploring the internet of things-marketing connection: A bibliometric review and directions for future research. Review of Management Literature, 3, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2754-586520240000003014/FULL/XML
99.
ZhouX., JiangJ., ZhouC., LiX., & YinM. (2024). Circular supply chain management: Antecedent effect of social capital and big data analysis capability and their impact on sustainable performance. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5311–5330.
100.
ZhuJ., & LiuW. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335.
