Abstract
Work addiction is an obsession with work distinguished by a compulsive mindset, whereas work engagement reflects a positive, fulfilling work-related state. This study examines the distinctions between work addiction and work engagement and their relationship with job performance among 168 bank employees in Egypt. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing a 4-point Likert-scale survey measuring work addiction (Dutch Workaholism Scale), work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale) and job performance. Data analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-tests and regression analysis. Findings revealed that work addiction significantly influences job performance (F(2, 47) = 4.27, p = .020), whereas work engagement does not have a significant direct impact (F(2, 47) = 0.19, p = .827). Additionally, the interaction between work addiction and work engagement was not significant (F(4, 47) = 1.57, p = .197), suggesting that engagement does not amplify or mitigate the effects of addiction on performance. One-way ANOVA results indicated no significant differences in job performance based on work experience (F(4, 51) = 1.91, p = .124), and t-tests showed no gender-based differences (t(53) = 0.59, p = .555). These findings challenge the assumption that engagement universally enhances performance, highlighting the dominant role of work addiction in driving short-term job outcomes. The study provides managerial insights into balancing productivity with employee well-being and suggests future research on workplace interventions to mitigate the risks of compulsive work behaviours while fostering sustainable engagement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
