Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership,Talent Management,Social Media,Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technology on Business Performance in Handicraft Industry: An Analysis of Innovation as Moderating Construct
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership,Talent Management,Social Media,Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technology on Business Performance in Handicraft Industry: An Analysis of Innovation as Moderating Construct
This article aims to analyse the impact of digital technology (DT), entrepreneurial leadership (EL), social media (SM) and artificial intelligence (AI) on business performance (BP). This study also analyses the mediating impact of talent management (TM), strategic resilience (SR) and entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and the moderating impact of innovation (INO) for TM and BP. We used the SMART partial least square method (SMART PLS-SEM) software to analyse the valid data. Data were collected by the survey method through a random sampling procedure from 410 related handicraft artisans. The study’s findings prove EL, TM and DT and that SM significantly impacts BP, but AI has an insignificant effect on BP. This study explores artisans’ formal EL style, but the role of AI, DT, SM and TM has remained unexplored. This research shows that craft business owners and managers must allocate more resources to talent management. The most effective business methods in the arts and crafts sector can be implemented with excellent talent management. This study is unique because the dynamic capability theory and resource-based view used for supporting variables will be extended.
Al HakmaniF., Al-TammamiN., NazarudeenM., Al-RawahiM., Al-FahdiO., & SharmaA. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on organisation restructuring in Orient Insurance in Oman. Authorea Preprints.
2.
AljanabiA. R. A. (2018). The mediating role of absorptive capacity on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and technological innovation capabilities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(4), 818–841.
3.
Anning-DorsonT. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership as antecedents organizational flexibility: Implications for SME competitiveness. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1309–1325.
4.
AvolioB. J., & BassB. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ): Third edition manual and sampler set. Mind Garden.
5.
BascoR., Hernández-PerlinesF., & Rodríguez-GarcíaM. (2020). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance: A multigroup analysis comparing China, Mexico, and Spain. Journal of Business Research, 113, 409–421.
6.
BrozovicD. (2018). Strategic flexibility: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3–31.
7.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
8.
BarneyJ., WrightM., & KetchenD. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625–641.
BinghamC. B., EisenhardtK. M., & FurrN. R. (2007). What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 27–47.
11.
CarpenterM. A., GeletkanczM. A., & SandersW. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.
12.
CheahJ. H., MemonM. A., ChuahF., TingH., & RamayahT. (2018). Assessing reflective models in marketing research: A comparison between pls and pls estimates. International Journal of Business Society, 19(1), 139–160.
13.
ChoY. H., & LeeJ.-H. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial education, and performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 21(2), 34–45.
14.
ChoiJ. H., KimS., & YangD. H. (2018). Small and medium enterprises and the relation between social and financial performance: empirical evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(6), 15–19.
15.
CogliserC. C., & BrighamK. H. (2004). The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: Mutual lessons to be learned. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 771–799.
16.
ColemanR. O., & AdimC. V. (2019). Entrepreneurial proactiveness and organizational resilience in mobile telecommunication firms in Rivers State, Nigeria. Strategic Journal of Business and Change Management, 6(3), 454–465. https://doi.org.10.61426/sjbcm.v6i3.1329
17.
CollingsD. G., & MellahiK. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), pp. 304–313.
18.
D’AngeloA., & PresuttiM. (2019). SMEs international growth: The moderating role of experience on entrepreneurial and learning orientations. International Business Review, 28(3), 613–624.
19.
DeyP. K., ChowdhuryS., AbadieA., Vann YarosonE., & SarkarS. (2023). Artificial intelligence-driven supply chain resilience in Vietnamese manufacturing small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Research, 62(15), 5417–5456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859
20.
DubeyR., BrydeD. J., DwivediY. K., GrahamG., ForoponC., & PapadopoulosT. (2023). Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 258, 108790.
21.
EngelenA., SchmidtS., StrengerL., & BrettelM. (2014). Top management’s transformational leader behaviors and innovation orientation: A cross-cultural perspective in eight countries. Journal of International Management, 20(2), 124–136.
22.
EnsleyM. D., HmieleskiK. M., & PearceC. L. (2006a). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 217–231.
23.
Escrig-TenaA. B., Bou-LlusarJ. C., Beltran-MartınI., & Roca-PuigV. (2011). Modelling the implications of quality management elements on strategic flexibility. Advances in Decision Sciences, 20(3), 1–27.
24.
FachrunnisaO., AdhiatmaA., & TjahjonoH. K. (2020). Cognitive collective engagement: Relating knowledge-based practices and innovation performance. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(2), 743–765.
25.
Fernandez-PerezV., García-MoralesV. J., & PullesD. C. (2016). Entrepreneurial decision-making, external social networks, and strategic flexibility: The role of CEOs’ cognition. European Management Journal, 34, 296–309.
26.
FerreiraJ. J., FernandesC. I., & RaposoM. L. (2018). Measuring and understanding the psychological effects of entrepreneurial intentions: Multigroup analysis. In Tur PorcarA. & Ribeiro SorianoD. (Eds.), Inside the mind of the entrepreneur: Cognition, personality traits, intention, and gender behavior (pp. 17–31). Springer.
27.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable constructs and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 382–388. https://doi.org.10.1177/002224378101800313
28.
GhoshS., MahapatraM. S., TandonN., & TandonD. (2024). Achieving sustainable development goal of women empowerment: A study among self-help groups in India. FIIB Business Review, 13(4), 477–491. https://doi.org.10.1177/23197145231169074
29.
GiritliH., & OrazG. T. (2004). Leadership styles: Some evidence from the Turkish construction industry. Construct Management Economy, 22(3), 253–262.
30.
GligorN., HolcombM., & BozkurtS. (2019). Distinguishing between the concepts of supply chain agility and resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 467–487. https://doi.org.10.1108/IJLM-10-2017-0259
31.
GuptaV., MacMillanI. C., & SurieG. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Ventures, 19(2), 241–260.
32.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB., AndersonR. E., & TathamR. L. (2012). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education.
33.
HairJ. F., SarstedtM., RingleC. M., & MenaJ. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414–433.
34.
HammadiH. A., & NoorN. B. M. (2020). The role of leadership in the talent management and employee retention of education in Abu Dhabi. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 68–71.
35.
HarmanS. (1967). Psychological aspects of the theory of syntax. Journal of Philosophy, 64(2), 75. https://doi.org.10.2307/2023773
36.
HarriganK. R. (2001). Strategic resilience in the old and new economies. In HittsM. A., FreemanR. E., & HarrisonJ. S. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 97–123). Blackwell.
37.
HerhausenD., MorganR. E., BrozovicD., & VolberdaH. W. (2021). Re-examining strategic flexibility: A meta-analysis of its antecedents, consequences and contingencies. British Journal of Management, 32(2), 435–455.
38.
HessJ., & FlattenT. (2019). Strategic flexibility in turbulent times: Impact of CEO’s willingness and permission to change. AndersenT. J., TorpS., & LinderS. (Eds.), Strategic responsiveness and adaptive organizations: New research frontiers in international strategic management (Emerald studies in global strategic responsiveness) (pp. 9–24). Emerald Publishing Limited.
39.
HuangS., DingD., & ChenZ. (2014). Entrepreneurial leadership and performance in Chinese new ventures: A moderated mediation model of exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and environmental dynamism. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 453–471.
40.
IqbalQ., HazlinaN., NasimA. A., & KhanS. A. R. (2020). A moderated-mediation analysis of psychological empowerment: Sustainable leadership and sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121429.
41.
IqbalS., Ul HassanM., & HabibahU. (2018). Impact of self-service technology (SST) service quality on customer loyalty and behavioral intention: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1.
42.
IrtaimehH. J., Al-AzzamZ. F., & KhaddamA. A. (2016). Exploring the impact of talent management strategies and service quality on beneficiaries satisfaction in Jordan healthcare sector: Provider point of view. International Journal of Management, 7(7), 23–38.
43.
JansenJ. J. P., VeraD., & CrossanM. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18.
44.
JhaS., & VenkateshV. (2023). Entrepreneurial satisfaction for women micro-entrepreneurs: A network perspective. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 13(5), 31–49. https://doi.org.10.1007/s40497-023-00351-7
45.
KabraS., & DassS. (2024). Licious’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A step towards crisis communication?FIIB Business Review, 13(1), 18–26. https://doi.org.10.1177/23197145221081916
46.
KafetzopoulosD., & GotzamaniK. (2019). Investigating the role of EFQM enablers in innovation performance. The TQM Journal, 31(2), 239–256.
47.
KafetzopoulosD., & GotzamaniK. (2022). The effect of talent management and leadership styles on firms’ sustainable performance. European Business Review, 34(6), 837–857. https://doi.org.10.1108/EBR-07-2021-0148
48.
KanwalI., LodhiR. N., & KashifM. (2019). Leadership styles and workplace ostracism among frontline employees. Management Research Review, 42(8), 991–1013.
49.
KaraD., UysalM., SirgyM. J., & LeeG. (2013). The effects of leadership style on employee wellbeing in hospitality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 9–18.
50.
KatsarosK., TsirikasA., & KostaG. (2020). The impact of leadership on firm financial performance: The mediating role of employees’ readiness to change. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 333–347.
51.
KaurH., SodhiD., AggarwalR., & YadavU. S. (2023). Managing human resources in digital marketing (vol. 111, pp. 155–162). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
52.
KaurH., SoodK., YadavU. S., & GrimaS. (2023). Sustainable solutions for insurance and risk management. In SoodK., GrimaS., YoungP., OzenE. & BalusamyB. (Eds.), The impact of climate change and sustainability standards on the insurance market (pp. 359–372). Scrivener Publishing LLC.
53.
KhanE. A., & QuaddusM. (2015). Development and validation of a scale for measuring sustainability factors of informal microenterprises: A qualitative and quantitative approach. Entrepreneurial Research Journal, 5(4), 347–372.
54.
KhanS., & GoelA. (2024). A perspective on digital transformation among Indian exporting firms. FIIB Business Review, 13(1), 7–17. https://doi.org.10.1177/23197145221093499
55.
KumarA., MandalM., & YadavU. S. (2022a). Business and entrepreneurial strategies for development of Indian small industries (MSME) during post-pandemic COVID-19 Indian artisans as entrepreneurs. Empirical Economics Letters, 21(4), 153–162.
56.
KumarA., MandalM., & YadavU. S. (2022b). Motivation and challenges in career choice and well being of women entrepreneurs: Experiences of small businesses of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 10890–10906.
57.
KumarA, YadavU. S., YadavG. P., & TripathiR. (2023). New sustainable ideas for materialistic solutions of smart city in India: A review from Allahabad city. Materials Today: Proceedings.
58.
KumarA., YadavU. S., MandalM., & YadavS. K. (2024). Impact of corporate innovation, technological innovation and ESG on environmental performance: Moderation test of entrepreneurial orientation and technological innovation as mediator using Sobel test. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(7), 2635–2650.
59.
KumarM., RautR. D., ManglaS. K., FerrarisA., & ChoubeyV. K. (2022). The adoption of artificial intelligence-powered workforce management for effective revenue growth of micro, small, and medium scale enterprises (MSMEs). Production Planning & Control, 35(13), 1639–1655. https://doi.org.10.1080/09537287.2022.2131620
60.
KumarS., & BhatiaM. S. (2021). Environmental dynamism, industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating role of organizational and technological factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 95, 54–64.
KuratkoD. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: Guest editor’s perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1–11.
63.
LatanH., & NoonanR. (2017). Partial least squares path modelling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. In LatanH. & NoonanR. (Eds.), Methodological issues and applications (pp. 1–14). Springer.
64.
LiY.-H., HuangJ.-W., & TsaiM.-T. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Indian Marketing Management, 38(4), 440–449.
65.
LumpkinG. T., & DessG. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 58–73.
66.
Luna-ArocasR., & TangT. L. P. (2015). Are you satisfied with your pay when you compare? It depends on your love of money, pay comparison standards and culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 279–289.
67.
MandersB., de VriesH., & BlindK. (2016). ISO 9001 and product innovation: A literature review and research framework. Technovation, 48–49(1), 41–55.
68.
MathewV., Santhosh KumarP. K., & SanjeevM. A. (2024). Financial well-being and its psychological determinants—An emerging country perspective. FIIB Business Review, 13(1), 42–55. https://doi.org.10.1177/23197145221121080
69.
MathivathananD., GovindanK., & HaqA. N. (2017). We are exploring the impact of dynamic capabilities on a sustainable supply chain firm’s performance using the grey-analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 637–653.
70.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
71.
MillerD., & Le Breton–MillerI. (2011). Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 1051–1076.
72.
MorganT., AnokhinS., KretininA., & FrishammarJ. (2015). The dark side of the entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation interplay: A new product development perspective. International Small Business Journal, 33(7), 731–751.
73.
NadkarniS., & HerrmannP. (2010). CEO personality, strategic resilience, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073.
74.
NeumannO., GuirguisK., & SteinerR. (2022). Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: A comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(1), 114–141. https://doi.org.10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685
75.
NowakR. (2021). Strategic resilience and performance: Effects of potential and realized absorptive capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(7), 1–22.
76.
NuaimiΒ., KumarS., RenS., BudhwarP., & VorobyevD. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636–648.
77.
OkparaF. O. (2007). The value of creativity and innovation in entrepreneurship. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 3(2), 1.
78.
O’ReillyC., CaldwellD., ChatmanJ., LapizM., & SelfW. (2010). How leadership matters: The effects of leaders’ alignment on strategy implementation. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 104–113.
79.
Otero-NeiraC., AriasM. J. F., & LindmanM. T. (2013). Market orientation and entrepreneurial proclivity: Antecedents of innovation. Global Business Review, 14(3), 385–395.
80.
PantouvakisA., & VlachosI. (2020). Talent and leadership effects on sustainable performance in the maritime industry. Transportation Research Part D, 86, 102440.
81.
ParkG., ShinS. R., & ChoyM. (2020). Early mover (dis)advantages and knowledge spillover effects on blockchain startups’ funding and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 109, 64–75.
82.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ. Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
83.
PrakashG. (2014). QoS in the internal supply chain: The next lever of competitive advantage and business performance. Production Planning & Control, 25(7), 572–591.
84.
RanaS. (2020). Business practices and lessons from emerging markets. FIIB Business Review, 9(3), 149–151.
85.
RanaS. (2021). A review on research during COVID 19 and call for research on marketing during the pandemic. FIIB Business Review, 10(4), 309–314.
86.
RanaS., PrasharS., BaraiM. K., & HamidA. B. A. (2021). Determinants of international marketing strategy for emerging market multinationals. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(2), 154–178.
87.
RanaS., VermaS., HaqueM. M., & AhmedG. (2022). Conceptualizing international positioning strategies for Indian higher education institutions. Review of International Business and Strategy, 32(4), 503–519.
88.
RattenS, & UsmaniM. A. (2021). Global pandemic and entrepreneurial intention: How adversity leads to entrepreneurship. Sage Open, 12(3), 21582440221123421.
89.
RauchA., WiklundJ., LumpkinG. T., & FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.
90.
RosenheadJ., FrancoL. A., GrintK., & FriedlandB. (2021). Complexity theory and leadership practice: A review, a critique, and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101304.
91.
RushitaD., SoodK., & YadavU. S. (2023). Cryptocurrency and digital money in the new era. InDigital transformation, strategic resilience, cyber security and risk management (vol. 111, pp. 179–190). Emerald Publishing Limited.
92.
SadeliJ. (2012). The influence of leadership, talent management organizational culture and organizational support on employee engagement. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 5(3), 1–21.
93.
SchulerR. S., JacksonS. E., & TariqueI. (2011). Global talent management and global talent challenges: Strategic opportunities for IHRM. Journal of World Business, 46(4), 506–516.
94.
SchwaekeJ., PetersA., KanbachD. K., KrausS., & JonesP. (2024). The new normal: The status quo of AI adoption in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–35. https://doi.org.10.1080/00472778.2024.2379999
95.
ShirokovaG., BogatyrevaK., BeliaevaT., & PufferS. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in different environmental settings. Journal of Small Business Enterprise Development, 42(2), 34–49.
96.
ShirokovaG., OsiyevskyyO., & BogatyrevaK. (2016). Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 34(4), 386–399.
97.
SinghN. (2024). Framework of goal-driven risk management in software development projects using the socio-technical systems approach. FIIB Business Review, 13(4), 437–451. https://doi.org.10.1177/23197145211032412
98.
SinglaN., SoodK., GrimaS., & YadavU. S. (2023). Target 8.8: Protect labor rights and promote a safe working environment. In SoodK., GrimaS., YoungP., OzenE. & BalusamyB. (Eds.), The impact of climate change and sustainability standards on the insurance market (pp. 373–392). Scrivener Publishing LLC.
99.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. https://doi/org.10.2307/270723
100.
SonJ., ParkO., BaeJ., & OkC. (2020). Double-edged effect of TMbusiness performance: The moderating role of HRM investments. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(17), 2188–2216.
101.
SongZ., & GuQ. (2020). Exchange ideology and employee creativity: A moderated mediation analysis. Management Decision, 58(7), 1375–1395.
102.
StahlG.K., BjörkmanI., FarndaleE., MorrisS. S., PaauweJ., StilesP., TrevorJ., & WrightP. M. (2012). Six principles of effective global talent management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 24–32.
103.
SuárezE., CalvoA., & RoldánJ. L. (2016). The role of strategic planning in excellence management systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 532–542.
104.
TeeceD. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations, of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
TripathiM. A., TripathiR., YadavU. S., & ShastriR. K. (2022). Gig economy: A paradigm shift towards digital HRM practices. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 5609–5617.
107.
TripathiM. A., TripathiR., & YadavU. S. (2022a). Prospects of impending digital platform economy: Rise of gig work. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(3), 4879–4887.
108.
TripathiM. A., TripathiR., & YadavU. S. (2022b). The gig economy: Workers, work, and platform perspective. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 3434–3450.
109.
Uhl-BienM., & ArenaM. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104.
110.
WadstromP. (2019). Aligning corporate and business strategy: Managing the balance. Journal of Business Strategy, 40(4), 44–52.
111.
WalesW. J., GuptaV. K., & MousaF.-T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Internation Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357–383.
112.
WalumbwaF. O., & HartnellC. A. (2011). Understanding transformational leadership employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 153–172.
113.
WangW., AroraR., LivescuK., & BilmesJ. (2015, June). On deep multi-view representation learning, International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1083–1092, PMLR.
114.
WuL.Y. (2010). Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 27–31.
115.
YadavU. S., GhosalI., PareekA., KhandelwalK., YadavA. K., & ChakrabortyC. (2024). Impact of entrepreneurial orientation and ESG on environmental performance: Moderating impact of digital transformation and technological innovation as a mediating construct using Sobel test. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 86.
116.
YadavU. S., & TripathiR. (2024). Impact of innovation, entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial leadership on supply chain resilience in handicraft industry: Moderating role of supply chain orientation. Benchmarking: An International Journal. (Ahead in Press).
117.
YadavU. S., TripathiR., KumarA., & ShastriR. K. (2024a). Evaluation of factors affecting women artisans as entrepreneurs in the handicraft sector: A study on financial, digital technology factors and developmental strategies about ODOP in Uttar Pradesh to boost economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1),1–54.
118.
YadavU. S., VyasS., Kanchan, GhosalI., & YadavA. K. (2024b). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership, social media, digital technology, entrepreneurial orientation and innovation on business performance in the handicraft sector: Talent management as mediating construct. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 72.
119.
ZawislakP. A., AlvesA. C., Tello-GamarraJ., BarbieuxD., & ReichertF. M. (2012). Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(2), 14–25.
