Innovation plays a critical role in the growth of developing economies like India. The primary purpose of the current study is to investigate the role of research and development (R&D) and Information and communication technology (ICT) in firms’ innovation outcomes. The study uses data from firm-level surveys in India to examine the linkages of R&D and ICT on innovation outcomes and establishes linkages with policy elements to develop innovation ecosystems. The study uses a set of tobit regression models, generalized structural equations model and explorative content analysis to examine innovation outcomes of firms. The results indicate that both R&D and ICT parameters play a significant role in influencing innovation outcomes though they are moderated by the size of the firm and sector. The study adds to the existing literature on the resource-based view of the firm and also the literature on innovation management in the context of emerging economies. The authors examine the role of capabilities around R&D and ICT in influencing firm-level innovations.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
2.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277.
3.
AlmeidaP., & PheneA. (2012). Managing knowledge within and outside the multinational corporation. In AnderssonM., JohanssonB., KarlssonC., & LoofH. (Eds.), Innovation and growth (pp. 21–37). Oxford University Press.
4.
ArendtL., & GrabowskiW. (2018). Impact of ICT utilization on innovations and on labor productivity: Micro-level analysis for Poland. In DiasA., SalmelinB., PereiraD., & DiasM. S. (Eds.), Modeling innovation sustainability and technologies. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer.
5.
BarneyJ., WrightM., & KetchenD. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.
6.
BaumC. F., LoofH., NabaviP., & StephanA. (2015). A new approach to estimation of the R&D-innovation-productivity relationship. Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation, Studies (CESIS), The Royal Institute of technology.
7.
BeersC. V., & ZandF. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292–312.
8.
BhagavatulaS., MudambiR., & MurmannJ. P. (2019). Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: An overview. Management and Organization Review, 15(3), 467–493.
9.
BroadstockD. C., MatousekR., MeyerM., & TzeremesN. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99–110.
10.
CerqueraD., & KleinG. J. (2008). Endogenous firm heterogeneity, ICT and R&D incentives (Endogenous firm heterogeneity, ICT and R&D incentives ed.). Centre for European Economic Research.
11.
CréponB., DuguetE., & MairesseJ. (1998). Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115–58.
12.
DahlmanC. J., & UtzA. (2005). India and the knowledge economy: Leveraging strengths and opportunities. World Bank Publications.
13.
DavisF. D., BagozziR. P., & WarshawP. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
14.
DavisF. D., & VenkateshV. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19–45.
15.
DruckerP. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practices and principles. Harper & Row.
16.
DruckerP. F. (2002). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review (August), 5–11.
17.
DuttaS., LanvinB., LeónL. R., & Wunsch-VincentS. (2021). Global innovation index 2021: Tracking innovation through the COVID-19 crisis. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2021.pdf
18.
Garcia MartínezM., ZouaghiF., & Garcia MarcoT. (2017). Diversity is strategy: The effect of R&D team diversity on innovative performance. R&D Management, 47(2), 311–329.
19.
HaiderS., & MishraP. P. (2021). Does innovative capability enhance the energy efficiency of Indian Iron and Steel firms? A Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis. Energy Economics, 95, 105128.
20.
HallB. H., LottiF., & MairesseJ. (2012). Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(3), 1–29.
21.
HameedW. U., BasheerM. F., IqbalJ., AnwarA., & AhmadH. K. (2018). Determinants of firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R&D department: An empirical evidence from Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8, 1–20.
22.
HanayshaJ. R., Al-ShaikhM. E., JogheeS., & AlzoubiH. M. (2022). Impact of innovation capabilities on business sustainability in small and medium enterprises. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 67–78.
23.
KanterR. M. (2006). Innovation: The classic traps. Harvard Business Review, 84(11), 72–83.
24.
Luedde-NeurathR. (1988). State intervention and export-oriented development in South Korea. Developmental States in East Asia, 68–112.
25.
ManognaR. L., & MishraA. K. (2021). Does investment in innovation impact firm performance in emerging economies? An empirical investigation of the Indian food and agricultural manufacturing industry. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(2), 233–248. 10.1108/ijis-07-2020-0104
26.
MardaniA., NikoosokhanS., MoradiM., & DoustarM. (2018). The relationship between knowledge management and innovation performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12–26.
27.
McGahanA. M., & PorterM. E. (1997). How much does industry matter, really?Strategic Management Journal, 18, 15–30.
28.
PakesA., & GrilichesZ. (1984). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. In GrilichesZ. (Ed.), R&D, patents, and productivity. University of Chicago Press.
29.
PenroseE. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley.
30.
PolderM., LeeuwenG. V., MohnenP., & RaymondW. (2009). Productivity effects of innovation modes (Discussion Paper No. 09033 ed.). Statistics Netherlands.
31.
PrabhuJ., & JainS. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: Understanding jugaad. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 843–868.
32.
RumeltR. P. (1991). How much does industry matter?Strategic Management Journal, 12, 167–185.
33.
SainiS., & GiriJ. N. (2022). Infrastructure development in India: The way ahead. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 14(1), 37–44.
34.
SantoroG., BrescianiS., & PapaA. (2020). Collaborative modes with cultural and creative industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity. Technovation, 92, 102040.
35.
SareenA., & PandeyS. (2022). Organizational innovation in knowledge intensive business services: The role of networks, culture and resources for innovation. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 107–118.
36.
SimmondsK. (1986). Marketing as innovation; the eight paradigm. Journal of Management Studies, 5(23), 151–156.
37.
SteinbergP. J., ProcherV. D., & UrbigD. (2017). Too much or too little of R&D offshoring: The impact of captive offshoring and contract offshoring on innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(10), 1810–1823.
UsaiA., FianoF., PetruzzelliA. M., PaoloniP., BriamonteM. F., & OrlandoB. (2021). Unveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 133, 327–336.
40.
WangC., & HuQ. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94, 102010.
41.
WuS., DingX., LiuR., & GaoH. (2021). How does IT capability affect open innovation performance? The mediating effect of absorptive capacity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 43–65.
42.
WangJ. (2018). Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong. Research Policy, 47(2), 399–412.
43.
WhiteG., & WadeR. (1988). Developmental states and markets in East Asia: An introduction. Developmental States in East Asia, 1–29.
44.
YiJ., HongJ., chung HsuW., & WangC. (2017). The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation, 62, 4–13.
45.
ZhuJ., WangY., & WangC. (2019). A comparative study of the effects of different factors on firm technological innovation performance in different high-tech industries. Chinese Management Studies, 13(1), 2–25.
46.
ZouaghiF., SánchezM., & MartínezM. G. (2018). Did the global financial crisis impact firms’ innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high- and low-tech industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 92–104.
