The purpose of this article is to review and systematize prior work on technological innovation in family firms and to open up an agenda to guide future research into this promising area. The study shows that family involvement has direct effects on innovation inputs (e.g., R&D expenditures), activities (e.g., leadership in new product development projects), and outputs (e.g., number of new products), as well as moderating effects on the relationships between these steps of technological innovation. The article uses theories applied in family business research (e.g., agency theory) to discuss opportunities for extending technological innovation frameworks by considering family involvement.
BergfeldM.-M. H.WeberF.-M. (2011). Dynasties of innovation: Highly performing German family firms and the owners’ role for innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(1), 80-94.
7.
BlockJ. H. (2009). Long-term orientation of family firms. An investigation of R&D investments, downsizing practices, and executive pay. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
8.
BlockJ. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 248-265.
9.
BlundellR.GriffithsR.Van ReenenJ. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic studies, 66, 529-554.
10.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265.
11.
CarneyM.GedajlovicE. (2002). The coupling of ownership and control and the allocation of financial resources: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 123-146.
12.
CassiaL.De MassisA.PizzurnoE. (2011). An exploratory investigation on NPD in small family businesses from Northern Italy. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(2), 1-14.
13.
CassiaL.De MassisA.PizzurnoE. (2012). Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18, 198-232.
14.
ChenH. L.HsuW. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22, 347-362.
15.
ChesbroughH. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
16.
ChiesaV. (2001). R&D strategy and organization: Managing technical change in dynamic contexts. London, England: Imperial College Press.
17.
ChinC. L.ChenY. J.KleinmanG.LeeP. (2009). Corporate ownership structure and innovation: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry. Journal of Accounting Auditing Finance, 24(1), 145-175.
18.
ChiricoF.SirmonD.SciasciaS.MazzolaP. (2011). Resource orchestration in family firms: Investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 307-326.
19.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. J. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of management Journal, 55, 976-997.
20.
ChristensenC. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
21.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
22.
ChurchillN. C.HattenK. J. (1997). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family business. Family Business Review, 10, 53-67.
23.
ClassenN.CarreeM.Van GilsA.PetersB. (2011). The role of family ownership in research, innovation and productivity of SMEs: A stepwise econometric analysis. Paper presented at the IFERA 11th Annual World Family Business Research Conference, Palermo, Italy.
24.
ClassenN.Van GilsA.BammensY.CarreeM. (2012). Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 191-215.
25.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
26.
CooperR. G.KleinschmidtE. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169-184.
27.
CraigJ. B. L.DibrellC. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19, 275-288.
28.
CraigJ. B. L.MooresK. (2006). A 10 year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review, 19, 1-10.
29.
CrossanM. M.ApaydinM. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1154-1191.
30.
CzarnitzkiD.KraftK. (2009). Capital control, debt financing and innovative activity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 372-383.
31.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory ofthe firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
DahlanderL.GannD. M. (2010). How open is innovation?Research Policy, 39, 699-709.
33.
De MassisA. (2012). Family Involvement and Procedural Justice Climate among Non-Family Managers: The Effects of Affect, Social Identities, Trust and Risk of Non-Reciprocity. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(6), 1227-1234.
34.
De MassisA.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183-199.
35.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.KotlarJ.NordqvistM.ChrismanJ. J. (2012). Critical success factors for product innovation in family business: A multiple case-study. Paper presented at the IFERA 11th Annual World Family Business Research Conference, Bordeaux, France.
36.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.PizzurnoE.CassiaL. (2013). Product innovation in family vs. non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management.
37.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.CassiaL. (in press). How do entrepreneurs of family firms perceive their competitive advantages and disadvantages compared to non-family companies? Empirical evidence from the transportation industry. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 51(1).
38.
De MassisKotlarJ.ChuaJ.H.ChrismanJ.J. (in press). Ability and Willingness as Sufficiency Conditions for Family-Oriented Particularistic Behavior: Implications for Theory and Empirical Studies. Journal of Small Business Management.
39.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.FrattiniF. (in press). Is social capital perceived as a source of competitive advantage or disadvantage for family firms? An exploratory analysis of CEO perceptions. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(1).
40.
De MassisA.SharmaP. A.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
41.
DruckerP. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
42.
DunnB. (1996). Family enterprises in the UK: A special sector?Family Business Review, 9, 139-155.
43.
DurandR.VargasV. (2003). Ownership, organization, and private firms’ efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 667-675.
44.
DyerW. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 401-416.
45.
DyerW. G.Jr.DyerW. J. (2009). Putting the family into family business research. Family Business Review, 22, 216-219.
46.
EarleyP. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 565-581.
47.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
48.
ErnstH. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1-40.
49.
FurrerO.ThomasH.GoussevskaiaA. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1-23.
50.
FreemanC. (1976). Economics of industrial innovation. London, England: Pinter.
51.
García-ÁlvarezE.López-SintasJ. (2001). A taxonomy of founders based on values: The root of family business heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14, 209-230.
52.
GedajlovicE.CaoQ.ZhangH. (2012). Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: Evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 652-665.
53.
GedajlovicE.CarneyM. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1145-1172.
54.
GedajlovicE.LubatkinM. H.SchulzeW. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 899-912.
55.
GeroskiP.MachinS.Van ReenenJ. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 198-211.
56.
GersickK. E.DavisJ. A.HamptonM. M.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
57.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
58.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
59.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Nunez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of management Journal, 44(1), 81-95.
60.
GudmundsonD.HartmanE. A.TowerC. B. (1999). Strategic orientation: Differences between family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 12, 27-39.
61.
GudmundsonD.TowerC. B.HartmanE. A. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1-18.
62.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 9, 157-170.
63.
HarrisD.MartinezJ. L.WardJ. L. (1994). Is strategy different for the family-owned businesses?Family Business Review, 7, 159-176.
64.
HatchN. W.DyerJ. H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1155-1178.
65.
HelfatC. E. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
66.
HofstedeG. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
HortonT. (1986). Managing in a family way. Management Review, 75(2), 3.
68.
HoskissonR. E.HittM. A.JohnsonR. A.GrossmanW. (2002). Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 697-716.
69.
HoyF.SharmaP. (2010). Entrepreneurial family firms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70.
HsuL. C.ChangH. C. (2011). The role of behavioral strategic controls in family firm innovation. Industry and Innovation, 18, 709-727.
71.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
72.
KochharR.DavidP. (1996). Institutional investors and firm innovation: a test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 73-84.
73.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FrattiniF.BianchiM.FangH. (2012). Technology acquisition in family-controlled firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Paper presented at the 19th International Product Development Management Conference, Manchester, England.
74.
KleinS. B.AstrachanJ. H.SmyrniosK. X. (2005). The F PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 321-339.
75.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
76.
Le Breton-MillerI. L.MillerD. (2006). Why do some family businesses out compete? governance, long term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731-746.
77.
LichtenthalerU. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 822-846.
78.
LichtenthalerU.MuethelM. (2012). The impact of family involvement on dynamic innovation capabilities: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(6). Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00548.x
79.
LlachJ.NordqvistM. (2010). Innovation in family and non-family businesses: A resource perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2, 381-399.
80.
LumpkinG. T.SteierL.WrightM. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship in family business. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 285-306.
81.
McKelvieA.McKennyA. F.LumpkinG. T.ShortJ. C. (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship in family business: Past contributions and future opportunities. In MelinL.NordqvistM.SharmaP. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business studies. New York, NY: Sage.
82.
McCannJ. E.Leon GuerreroA. Y.HaleyJ. D.Jr. (2001). Strategic goals and practices of innovative family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 50-59.
83.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
84.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78.
85.
MunariF.OrianiR.SobreroM. (2010). The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39, 1093-1104.
86.
Muñoz-BullónF.Sanchez-BuenoM. J. (2011). The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24, 62-70.
87.
NohriaN.GulatiR. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation?Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1245-1264.
88.
NordqvistM.MelinL. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 211-239.
89.
OrdaniniA.RuberaG.DeFillippiR. (2008). The many moods of inter-organizational imitation: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 375-398.
90.
PittinoD.VisintinF. (2009). Innovation and strategic types of family SMEs. A test and extension of Miles and Snow’s configurational model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 17, 257-295.
91.
PodsakoffP.MacKenzieS.BachrachD.PodsakoffN. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 473-488.
92.
PorterM. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London, England: Macmillan.
93.
ReuberA. R. (2010). Strengthening your literature review. Family Business Review, 23, 105-108.
94.
RothaermelF. T.HessA. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18, 898-921.
95.
Sacristán-NavarroM.Gómez-AnsónS.Cabeza-GarcíaL. (2011). Family ownership and control, the presence of other large shareholders, and firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 24, 71-93.
96.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (1996). A review and annotated bibliography of family business studies. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
97.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.GersickK. E. (2012). 25 years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25, 5-15.
98.
SharmaP.NordqvistM. (2008). A classification scheme for family firms: From family values to effective governance to firm performance. In TapiesJ.WardJ. L. (Eds.), Family values and value creation: How do family-owned businesses foster enduring values (pp. 71-101). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
99.
SharmaP.SalvatoC. (2011). Commentary: Exploiting and exploring new opportunities over life cycle stages of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 351199-1205.
100.
SirmonD. G.ArregleJ.HittM. A.WebbJ. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 979-998.
101.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
102.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A.IrelandR. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273-292.
103.
SteijversT.VoordeckersW. (2009). Private family ownership and the agency costs of debt. Family Business Review, 22, 333-346.
104.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-208.
105.
TeeceD. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
ThiemeJ. (2007). Perspective: The world’s top innovation management scholars and their social capital. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 214-229.
108.
ThomsenS.PedersenT. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 689-705.
109.
TiddJ.BessantJ. R. (2009). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. New York, NY: John Wiley.
110.
TiddJ.BessantJ. R.PavittK. (2005). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. New York, NY: John Wiley.
111.
UlrichK. T.EppingerS. D. (2011). Product design and development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
112.
Van De VrandeV.VanhaverbekeW.DuystersG. (2009). External technology sourcing: The effect of uncertainty on governance mode choice. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 62-80.
113.
VergantiR. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
114.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2009). How are US family firms controlled?Review of Financial Studies, 22, 3047-3091.
115.
WagnerM. (2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 581-594.
116.
WestheadP. (1997). Ambitions, external environment and strategic factor differences between family and non-family companies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9, 127-158.
117.
WestheadP.HoworthC. (2007). “Types” of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 405-431.
118.
WuZ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2007). Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 875-895.
119.
YinR. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
120.
ZellwegerT. (2007). Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20, 1-15.
121.
ZellwegerT.NasonR.NordqvistM. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25, 136-155.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
