Section 135 of the Indian Companies Act of 2014 legally mandated large corporates to implement and report on social development work as corporate social responsibility (CSR). The regulatory changes made CSR an integral part of Indian organizations’ business plans and an important metric to assess an organization’s goodwill. However, several barriers have been observed to act as a roadblock to successfully implementing CSR in Indian service organizations. The current study identified and prioritized a set of significant barriers to the implementation of CSR. The study used the MCDM of Fuzzy DEMATEL to prioritize the identified barriers. The findings of the study suggest that ‘lack of financial resources’, ‘support from the top management’ and ‘lack of skills and knowledge’ were the most significant barriers for the Indian services organizations. The study is expected to contribute to the literature on CSR by providing a list of barriers to implementation and their relative influence when regulatory compulsion leads to CSR. For CSR managers, it aids in the decision-making process by understanding and addressing the barriers, easing the process of successfully implementing CSR in Indian service organizations.
Al-KwifiO. S., FarhaA. K. A., & ZaraketW. S. (2020). Competitive dynamics between multinational companies and local rivals in emerging markets. FIIB Business Review, 9(3), 189–204.
2.
AlizadehA. (2022). The drivers and barriers of corporate social responsibility: A comparison of the MENA Region and Western Countries. Sustainability, 14(2), 909.
3.
AlotaibiA., Edum-FotweF., & PriceA. D. (2019). Critical barriers to social responsibility implementation within mega-construction projects: The case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 11, 1755.
4.
AltuntasS., & YilmazM. K. (2016). Fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate the dimensions of marketing resources: An application in SMEs. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(3), 347–364.
5.
AndrevskiG., RichardO. C., FerrierW. J., & ShawJ. D. (2010, August). Managerial racial diversity, competitive aggressiveness and firm performance: A moderated mediation model. Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2010, No. 1, pp. 1–6). Briarcliff Manor.
6.
ArevaloJ. A., & AravindD. (2011). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: Approach, drivers, and barriers. The International Journal of Business in Society, 11(4), 399–414.
7.
ArvidssonS. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 339–354.
8.
AsifM., SearcyC., ZutshiA., & FisscherO. A. (2013). An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 7–17.
9.
BaniyaR., & RajakK. (2020). Attitude, motivation and barriers for CSR engagement among travel and tour operators in Nepal. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Education, 10, 53–70.
10.
BarauskaiteG., & StreimikieneD. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 278–287.
11.
BelloF. G., & KamangaG. (2020). Drivers and barriers of corporate social responsibility in the tourism industry: The case of Malawi. Development Southern Africa, 37(2), 181–196.
12.
BhardwajB. R. (2016). Role of green policy on sustainable supply chain management: A model for implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR). Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(2), 456–468.
13.
BrammallR. (2012). How green are shipping companies? (Working paper Series, XII, PP. 1–15). Southampton Solent University.
14.
BuxH., ZhangZ., & AhmadN. (2020). Promoting sustainability through corporate social responsibility implementation in the manufacturing industry: An empirical analysis of barriers using the ISM-MICMAC approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1729–1748.
15.
Casado-DíazA. B., Nicolau-GonzálbezJ. L., Ruiz-MorenoF., & Sellers-RubioR. (2014). The differentiated effects of CSR actions in the service industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(7), 558–565.
16.
ChangB., ChangC. W., & WuC. H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850–1858.
17.
ChauhanA., SinghA., & JharkhariaS. (2018). An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decision-making trail and evaluation, laboratory (DEMATEL) method approach for the analysis of barriers of waste recycling in India. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 68(2), 100–110.
18.
ChenM. J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalary: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100–134.
19.
ChenT., TribbittM. A., YangY., & LiX. (2017). Does rivals’ innovation matter? A competitive dynamics perspective on firms’ product strategy. Journal of Business Research, 76, 1–7.
20.
ChoiS. B., FengY., LiuJ., & ZhuQ. (2019). Motivating corporate social responsibility practices under customer pressure among small‐and medium‐sized suppliers in China: The role of dynamic capabilities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 213–226.
21.
CostaR., & MenichiniT. (2013). A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(1), 150–161.
22.
CrifoP., DiayeM. A., & PekovicS. (2016). CSR related management practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis of the quantity-quality trade-off on French Data. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(3), 405–416.
23.
DavenportK. (2000). Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it. Business & Society, 39(2), 210–219.
24.
De NeveG. (2009). Power, inequality and corporate social responsibility: The politics of ethical compliance in the South Indian garment industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(22), 63–71.
25.
DixitS. K., & PriyaS.S. (2021). Barriers to corporate social responsibility: An Indian SME perspective. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 10.1108/IJOEM-02-2021-0294
26.
DoaneD. (2005). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Minnows, mammoths and markets. Futures, 37(2–3), 215–229.
27.
DuS., BhattacharyaC. B., & SenS. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Science, 57(9), 1528–1545.
28.
DuarteF. P., & RahmanS. (2010). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility by Bangladeshi managers: An exploratory study. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(5), 119–136.
29.
EndrikatJ., De VilliersC., GuentherT. W., & GuentherE. M. (2021). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic investigation. Business & Society, 60(8), 2099–2135.
30.
EteokleousP. P., LeonidouL. C., & KatsikeasC. S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in international marketing: Review, assessment, and future research. International Marketing Review, 33(4), 580–624.
31.
EvangelinosK., SkouloudisA., JonesN., IsaacD., & SfakianakiE. (2016). Exploring the status of corporate social responsibility disclosure in the UK building and construction industry. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 15(4), 377–399.
32.
FaisalM. N. (2010). Analysing the barriers to corporate social responsibility in supply chains: An interpretive structural modelling approach. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 13(3), 179–195.
33.
GaravanT. N., HeratyN., RockA., & DaltonE. (2010). Conceptualizing the behavioral barriers to CSR and CS in organizations: A typology of HRD interventions. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(5), 587–613.
34.
GoyalP., RahmanZ., & KazmiA. A. (2013). Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: Literature review and future research agenda. Management Decisions, 51(2), 361–379.
35.
GoyalP., & KumarD. (2017). Modeling the CSR barriers in manufacturing industries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(7), 1871–1890.
36.
GraaflandJ., & ZhangL. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in China: Implementation and challenges. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(1), 34–49.
37.
GharakhaniD. (2012). The evaluation of supplier selection criteria by fuzzy DEMATEL method. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(4), 3215–3224.
38.
Investopedia. (2019). Social audit. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/social-audit.asp
39.
IslamT., IslamR., PitafiA. H., XiaobeiL., RehmaniM., IrfanM., & MubarakM. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123–135.
40.
JanssenC., & VanhammeJ. (2015). Theoretical lenses for understanding the CSR–consumer paradox. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 775–787.
41.
JavedA., & KhanZ. (2021). Fostering sustainable relationships in Pakistani cellular service industry through CSR and brand love. South Asian Journal of Business Studies. 10.1108/SAJBS-10-2020-0372
42.
KansalM., JoshiM., BabuS., & SharmaS. (2018). Reporting of corporate social responsibility in central public sector enterprises: A study of post mandatory regime in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(3), 813–831.
43.
KhabaS., & BharC. (2017). Quantifying SWOT analysis for the Indian coal mining industry using Fuzzy DEMATEL. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(4), 882–902.
44.
KhanS., KhanM. I., & HaleemA. (2019). Evaluation of barriers in the adoption of halal certification: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(1), 153–174.
45.
KhatwaniG., SinghS. P., TrivediA., & ChauhanA. (2015). Fuzzy-TISM: A fuzzy extension of TISM for group decision making. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(1), 97–112.
46.
KongL., SialM. S., AhmadN., SehleanuM., LiZ., Zia-Ud-DinM., & BadulescuD. (2021) CSR as a potential motivator to shape employees’ view towards nature for a sustainable workplace environment. Sustainability, 13(3), 1499.
47.
KumarD., GoyalP., & KumarV. (2019a). Prioritizing CSR barriers in the Indian Service Industry: A Fuzzy AHP approach. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66(2), 213–233.
48.
KumarD., GoyalP., & KumarV. (2019b). Modeling and classification of enablers of CSR in Indian firms. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(2), 456–475.
49.
KuoT. C., KremerG. E. O., PhuongN. T., & HsuC. W. (2016). Motivations and barriers for corporate social responsibility reporting: Evidence from the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 57, 184–195.
50.
KuzeyC., UyarA., NizaevaM., & KaramanA. S. (2021). CSR performance and firm performance in the tourism, healthcare, and financial sectors: Do metrics and CSR committees matter?Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128802.
51.
LaudalT. (2011). Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 234–256.
52.
LinR. J. (2013). Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 32–39.
53.
LiuM. T., LiuY., MoZ., ZhaoZ., & ZhuZ. (2019). How CSR influences customer behavioural loyalty in the Chinese hotel industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(1), 1–22
54.
LoosemoreM., & LimB. T. H. (2018). Mapping corporate social responsibility strategies in the construction and engineering industry. Construction Management and Economics, 36(2), 67–82.
55.
LuoJ. M., HuangG. Q., & LamC. F. (2019). Barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility in gaming industry. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 20(5), 528–551.
56.
LuthraS., GargD., & HaleemA. (2016). The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: An empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 142–158.
57.
LumdeN. (2015). Social audit in the context of CSR. https://indiacsr.in/social-audit-in-the-context-of-csr/
MeluboK., LovelockB. & FilepS., (2019). Motivations and barriers for corporate social responsibility engagement: Evidence from the Tanzanian tourism industry. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 19(3), 284–295.
60.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs. (2014). Companies Act, 2013. https://www.mca.gov.in/content/mca/global/en/acts-rules/companies-act/companies-act-2013.html
61.
MoonJ. & ShenX., (2010). CSR in China research: Salience, focus and nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 613–629.
62.
MudgalR. K., ShankarR., TalibP., & RajT. (2010). Modelling the barriers of green supply chain practices: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 7(1), 81–107.
63.
NairN., & SodhiJ. (2012). CSR practices by SMEs in India: Lessons from five case studies. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4), 583–597.
64.
ParmarP. S., & DesaiT. N. (2020). Evaluating sustainable lean six sigma enablers using fuzzy DEMATEL: A case of an Indian manufacturing organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121802.
65.
PorterM. E., & KramerM. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
66.
RayneD., LeckieC., & McDonaldH. (2020). Productive partnerships? Driving consumer awareness to action in CSR partnerships. Journal of Business Research, 118, 49–57.
67.
SahaR., CerchioneR., SinghR., & DahiyaR. (2020). Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 409–429.
68.
SajjadA., EwejeG., & TappinD. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management: Motivators and barriers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(7), 643–655.
69.
SchneiderA., & SchererA. G. (2019). State governance beyond the ‘shadow of hierarchy’: A social mechanisms perspective on governmental CSR policies. Organization Studies, 40(8), 1147–1168.
70.
SeokJ., LeeY., & KimB. D. (2020). Impact of CSR news reports on firm value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(3), 644–663.
71.
ShenL., GovindanK., & ShankarM. (2015). Evaluation of barriers of corporate social responsibility using an analytical hierarchy process under a fuzzy environment—A textile case. Sustainability, 7(3), 3493–3514.
72.
ShirodkarV., BeddewelaE., & RichterU. H. (2018). Firm-level determinants of political CSR in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 673–688.
73.
SiS. L., YouX. Y., LiuH. C., & ZhangP. (2018). DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1–33.
74.
SinghP. K., & SarkarP. (2020). A framework based on fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL for sustainable product development: A case of Indian automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118991.
75.
SodhiM. S., KumarC., & GangulyA. (2022). How mandatory corporate social responsibility can help governments with development goals. Business Strategy & Development, 5(1), 30–43.
76.
SweeneyL. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Ireland: Barriers and opportunities experienced by SMEs when undertaking CSR. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(4), 516–523.
77.
TangZ., HullC. E., & RothenbergS. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274–1303.
78.
VallentinS., 2015. Governmentalities of CSR: Danish government policy as a reflection of political difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 33–47.
79.
ValmohammadiC. (2011). Investigating corporate social responsibility practices in Iranian organizations: An ISO 26000 perspective. Business Strategy Series, 12(5), 257–263.
80.
VolleroA., PalazzoM., SianoA., & SardanelliD. (2018). Managing CSR communication: A study of legitimacy-seeking strategies adopted by service and product companies. The TQM Journal, 30(5), 621–637
81.
WangZ., MathiyazhaganK., XuL., & DiabatA. (2016). A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyze the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, 19–28.
82.
Werther JrW. B., & ChandlerD. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317–324.
83.
WuW. W., & LeeY. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.
84.
YadavM. P., & SinhaN. (2022). Investigating the impact of corporate social responsibility on competitive performance: An empirical study based on panel data analysis. FIIB Business Review, 11(2), 165–173
85.
YinJ., & ZhangY. (2012). Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 301–316.
86.
YoonB., LeeJ. H., & ByunR. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635.
87.
YuenK. F., & LimJ. M. (2016). Barriers to the implementation of strategic corporate social responsibility in shipping. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(1), 49–57.
88.
ZhangQ., OoB. L., & LimB. T. H. (2018). Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 563–584.
89.
ZhangQ., CaoM., ZhangF., LiuJ., & LiX. (2020). Effects of corporate social responsibility on customer satisfaction and organizational attractiveness: A signalling perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(1), 20–34.
