This study examines the communication imperative for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Based on in-depth interviews with CSR managers in large domestic and global corporations in India, the study furthers scholarly efforts to situate communication as central to the enactment of socially responsible behavior. The article begins by explicating the three prominent approaches—instrumental, relational, and constitutive—advanced in CSR scholarship, as a basis for understanding how CSR managers construct or articulate the case for communication in CSR. Participant discourses suggest an important and multi-dimensional role for communication, emphasize the need for subtlety and balance in communicating CSR, and point to the role of the media as a potential (dis)enabler for “getting the word out.” The study also reflects on the intersections and departures between scholarship and practice of CSR communication.
AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149.
2.
AmaladossM. X.ManoharH. L. (2013). Communicating corporate social responsibility—A case of CSR communication in emerging economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 65–80. doi:10.1002/csr.287
3.
ArasG.CrowtherD. (2011). Commentary: The view from management. In IhlenO.BartlettJ.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 516-533). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
ArevaloJ A.AravindD. (2011). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: Approach, drivers, and barriers. Corporate Governance, 11, 399-414.
5.
ArvidssonS. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 339-354.
6.
AxleyS. R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428-437.
7.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS.KorschunD. (2008, January1). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 37-44.
8.
BlowfieldM. E.FrynasJ. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81, 499-513.
9.
BojeD. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106-126.
10.
BojeD. M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-land.”Academy of Management Journal, 38, 997-1035.
11.
BotanC. (1997). Ethics in strategic communication campaigns: The case for a new approach to public relations. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 188–202.
12.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
13.
BroadfootK. J.MunshiD. (2007). Diverse voices and alternative rationalities: Imagining forms of postcolonial organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 249-267.
14.
CappelliP.Singh.H.SinghJ. V.UseemM. (2010). Leadership lessons from India. Harvard Business Review, 88, 90-97.
15.
CapriottiP. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through the Internet and social media. In IhlenO.BartlettJ.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 358-378). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
CarrollA. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48.
17.
CarrollA. B.ShabanaK. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 85-105.
18.
ChaudhriV.WangJ. (2007). Communicating corporate social responsibility on the Internet: A case study of the top 100 IT companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 232-247.
19.
CheneyG.ChristensenL. T. (2001). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In JablinF.M.PutnamL.L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 231-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
CheneyG.McMillanJ. J. (1990). Organizational rhetoric and the practice of criticism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 93-114.
21.
CloudD. L. (2007). Corporate social responsibility as oxymoron: Universalization and exploitation. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 219-231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
ChristensenL. T.MorsingM.ThyssenO. (2011). The polyphony of corporate social responsibility: Deconstructing accountability and transparency in the context of identity and hypocrisy. In CheneyG.MayS.MunshiD. (Eds.) The handbook of communication ethics (pp. 457-474). New York, NY: Routledge Curzon.
CrableR. E. (1990). Organizational rhetoric as the fourth great system: Theoretical, critical, and pragmatic implications. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 115-128.
27.
DeetzS. A. (2007). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and communication. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 267-278). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8-19.
EsrockS. L.LeichtyB. G. (1999). Corporate World Wide Web pages: Serving the news media and other publics. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 456-467.
31.
FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14, 5-26.
32.
FombrunC. J. (2005). A world of reputation research, analysis and thinking—building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: Evolving standards. Reputation Review, 8, 7-12.
33.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
34.
GautamR.SinghA. (2010). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: A study of top 500 companies. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 2, 41-56.
GodfreyP. C. (2005). The relationships between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777-798.
37.
GodfreyP. C.MerrillC. B.HansenJ. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425-445.
38.
GolobU.PodnarK. (2011). Corporate social responsibility communication and dialogue. In In IhlenO.BartlettJ.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 231-251). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
39.
GrantD.NybergD. (2011). The view from organizational studies: A discourse-base understanding of corporate social responsibility and communication. In IhlenO.BartlettJ.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 534-549). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
GreeningD. W.TurbanD. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254-280.
41.
HemingwayC. A.MaclaganP. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33-44.
42.
HooghiemstraR. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management–new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55-68.
43.
IhlenO.BartlettJ.MayS. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
44.
JuholinE. (2004). For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 4, 20–31.
45.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21–37.
46.
LedinghamJ. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15, 181–198.
47.
LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D. (1998). Relationship management and public relations: Dimensions of an organization–public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55–65.
48.
L’EtangJ.Lugo-OcandoJ.AhmadZ. A. (2011). Ethics: Corporate social responsibility, power and strategic communication. In IhlenO.BartlettJ.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 170-187). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
49.
LenssenG. (2007). Foreword. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. v-vi). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
LiveseyS. M.GrahamJ. (2007). Greening of corporations? Eco-talk and the emerging social imaginary of sustainable development. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 336-350). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
MaignanI.FerrellO. C.HultG. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455-469.
52.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424.
53.
MaxwellJ. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-300.
54.
MishraS.SuarD. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies?Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 571–601. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0441-1
55.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
56.
MitraM. (2007). It’s only business! India’s corporate social responsiveness in a globalized world. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
57.
MitraR. (2012). “My country’s future”: A culture-centered interrogation of corporate social responsibility in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 131-147.
58.
MohanA. (2001). Corporate citizenship: Perspectives from India. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2, 107-117.
59.
MongeP. (1988). 1998 ICA presidential address: Communication structures and processes in globalization. Journal of Communication, 48, 142-153.
60.
MorsingM (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 171-182.
61.
MorsingM.SchultzM. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 323-338.
62.
MorsingM.SchultzM.NielsenK. U. (2008). The “Catch 22” of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14, 97–111.
63.
MumbyD. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
64.
NielsenA. E.ThomsenC. (2009). Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18, 83-93.
65.
O’ConnorA.ShumateM. (2010). An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 529-551.
66.
O’ConnorA.ShumateM.MeisterM. (2008). Walk the line: Active moms define corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 34, 343-350.
67.
OkoyeA. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary?Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 613–627.
68.
OwenW. F. (1984). Relational themes in interpersonal communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287.
69.
PalM.DuttaM. J. (2013). “Land is our mother”: Alternative meanings of development in subaltern organizing. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 6, 203-220.
70.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
PedersenE. R. (2006). Making corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: How companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Business and Society Review, 111, 137–163.
72.
PlankenB.SahuS.NickersonC. (2010). Corporate social responsibility communication in the Indian context. Journal of Indian Business Research, 2, 10-22.
73.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-92.
SchoenebornD.TrittinH. (2013). Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 193-211.
76.
SchultzF.WehmeierS. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications. Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15, 9-29.
77.
ScottS. G.LaneV. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 43-62.
78.
SimsR. R.BrinkmanJ. (2003). Enron ethics (Or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243-256.
79.
SrivastavaA. K.NegiG.MishraV.PandeyS. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: A case study of TATA group. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 3, 17-27.
80.
StarckK.KruckebergD. (2003). Ethical obligations of public relations in an era of globalisation. Journal of Communication Management, 8, 29-40.
81.
StohlC. (2001). Globalizing organizational communication. In JablinF.PutnamL. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 323-375). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82.
SundarP. (2000). Beyond business: From merchant charity to corporate citizenship in India. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw Hill.
83.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84.
TenchR.BowdR.JonesB. (2007). Perceptions and perspectives: Corporate social responsibility and the media. Journal of Communication Management, 11, 348-370.
85.
VisserW. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In CraneA.McWilliamsA.MattenD.MoonJ.SiegelD. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 473-499). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
86.
WaddockS.SmithN. (2000). Corporate responsibility audits: Doing well by doing good. Sloan Management Review, 41, 75-83.
87.
WaldmanD. A.. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 823-837.
88.
WehmeierS.SchultzF. (2011). Corporate communication and corporate social responsibility: A storytelling perspective. In IhlenO.BartlettJ.MayS. (Eds.) The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 467-488). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
