The study investigates the phenomenological impact of gender cues in advertisements on the perceived gender identity meanings of the advertised product. The study utilizes a randomly assigned participants design that exposes three separate groups of participants to differently gendered advertisements of the same product and captures the distinction in the participants’ construction of the gender identity meanings of the advertised product under experimental conditions. Results establish the significant influence of gender cues in advertisements on the perceived gender identity meanings of the advertised product. Results also underscore the difference in the perceptions of men and women under the same stimulus. Theoretical contributions and implications for marketers are discussed.
AliA.AliR.KumarD.HafeezM. H.GhufranB. (2012). Gender role portrayal in television advertisement: Evidence from Pakistan. Information Management and Business Review, 4(6), 340–351.
2.
AlreckP. L.SettleR. B.BelchM. A. (1982). Who responds to ‘gendered’ ads and how?Journal of Advertising Research, 22(2), 25–31.
3.
AlvessonM.BillingY. D. (1997). Understanding gender and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.
4.
AveryJ. (2012). Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand gender-bending. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 322–336.
5.
BaileyA. A. (2006). A year in the life of the African–American male in advertising. The Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 83–104.
6.
BelkR. W. (2004). Men and their machines. Advances in Consumer Research, 31(1), 273–278.
7.
BellizziJ. A.MilnerL. (1991). Gender positioning of a traditionally male-dominant product. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(3), 72–79.
8.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.
9.
BrannonR. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint of manhood and what it’s done for us lately. In DavidD.BrannonR. (Eds.), The forty-nine per cent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Random House.
10.
BretlD. J.CantorJ. (1988). The portrayal of men and women in U.S. television commercials: A recent content analysis and trends over 15 years. Sex Roles, 18(9/10), 595–609.
11.
BrowneB. A. (1998). Gender stereotypes in advertising on children’s television in the 1990s: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 83–96.
12.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
13.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
14.
ChildsN. M.MaherJ. K. (2003). Gender in food advertising to children: Boys eat first. British Food Journal, 105(7), 408–419.
15.
CollinsonD. L.HearnJ. (1994). Naming men as men: Implications for work, organizations and management. Gender, Work & Organization, 1(1), 2–22.
16.
CraigR. (1990). A content analysis comparing gender images in network television commercials aired in daytime, evening and weekend telecasts. Retrieved 23 January 2017, from www.theculturelab.umd.edu/uploads/1/4/2/2/14225661/craig_effecttv.pdf
17.
CzarniawskaB. (2013). Negotiating selves: Gender at work. Tamara—Journal of Critical Organization Inquiry, 11(1), 59–72.
18.
Datsun India. (2016a, 22 January). A coder finds his dream—#IsayYes. Retrieved 27 September 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5jbuarwtpI
19.
Datsun India. (2016b, 22 January). A Dancer Finds Her Dream—#IsayYes. Retrieved 27 September 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i2VlFrr2hg
20.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(7/8), 276–287.
21.
DebevecK.IyerE. (1986). The influence of spokes-persons in altering a product’s gender image: Implications for advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 12–20.
22.
DoolittleJ.PepperR. (1975). Children’s TV ad content. Journal of Broadcasting, 19(2), 131–142.
23.
DownsA. C.HarrisonS. K. (1985). Embarrassing age spots or just plain ugly? Physical attractiveness stereotyping as an instrument of sexism on American television commercials. Sex Roles, 13(1/2), 9–19.
24.
EaglyA. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
25.
FiratA. F. (1994). Gender and consumption: Transcending the feminine? In CostaJ. A. (Ed.), Gender and consumer behavior (pp. 205–225). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
26.
FischerE.GainerB. (1994). Masculinity and the consumption of organized sports. In CostaJ. A. (Ed.), Gender and consumer behavior (pp. 84–103). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
27.
FriedenL. R. (2013). The role of consumer gender identity and brand concept consistency in evaluating cross gender brand extensions. Retrieved 23 January 2017, from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4488/
28.
FugateD.PhillipsJ. (2010). Product gender perceptions and antecedents of product gender congruence. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(3), 251–261.
29.
FurnhamA.BitarN. (1993). The stereotype portrayal of men and women in British advertisements. Sex Roles, 29(3/4), 297–310.
30.
GainerB. (1993). An empirical investigation of the role of involvement with a gendered product. Psychology & Marketing, 10(4), 265–283.
31.
GalinskyE.AumannK.BondJ. T. (2012). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home in the USA. In ShafferM. A.JoplinJ. R.HsuY. S. (Eds.), Expanding the boundaries of work-family research: A vision for the future (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
GrubbE. L.GrathwohlH. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behaviour: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31(4), 22–27.
34.
HansJ. D.KerseyM.KimberleyC. (2012). Self-perceived origins of attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(1), 4–17.
35.
HarrisP. R.StobartJ. (1986). Sex role stereotyping in British television advertisements at different times of the day: An extension and refinement of Manstead and McCulloch (1981). British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 149–154.
36.
HoltC. L.EllisJ. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem sex-role inventory. Sex Roles, 39(11/12), 929–941.
37.
HoltD. B.ThompsonC. J. (2004). Man-of-action-heroes: The pursuit of heroic masculinity in everyday consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 425–440.
38.
IyerE.DebevecK. (1986). Gender stereotyping of products: Are products like people? In MalhotraN.HawesJ. (Eds.), Developments in marketing science (pp. 40–45). Atlanta, GA: Academy of Marketing Science.
39.
JoharG. V.MoreauP.SchwarzN. (2003). Gender typed advertisements and impression formation: The role of chronic and temporary accessibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 220–229.
40.
JohnsonT. W.WassersugR. J. (2010). Gender identity disorder outside the binary: When gender identity disorder-not journalwise specified is not good enough. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 597–598.
41.
KanungoR. N.JoharJ. (1975). Effects of slogans and human model characteristics in product advertisements. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 7(2), 127–138.
42.
KanungoR. N.PangS. (1973). Effects of human models on perceived product quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 172–178.
43.
KaufmanG. (1999). The portrayal of men’s family roles in television commercials. Sex Roles, 41(5/6), 439–458.
44.
KerrB. A.CohenS. (2001). Smart boys: Talent, masculinity, and the search for meaning. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
45.
KerrB. A.MultonK. D. (2015). The development of gender identity, gender roles, and gender relations in gifted students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 183–191.
46.
KnupferN. N. (1997). Gendered by design. Educational Technology, 37(2), 31–37.
47.
KnupferN. N. (1998). Gender di visions across technology advertisements and the www: Implications for educational equity. Theory into Practice, 37(1), 54–63.
48.
LaneR. C.SternbergD. (1985). Use of automobile as a narcissistic object, extension of the self, and a personal metaphor. In StreanH. S. (Ed.), Love and narcissism in psychoanalytic practice (81–97). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
49.
LatifA.SyedA. A.HalepotoA. H.NazarM. S.ShaikhF. M. (2012). Advertising effectiveness on brand judgment and consumer preference in purchasing decision in Pakistan. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 2(1), 9–13.
50.
LorberJ. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
MacklinC.KolbeR. H. (1983). Sex role stereotyping in children’s advertising: Current and past trends. Journal of Advertising, 13(2), 34–42.
52.
MaherJ. K.ChildsN. M. (2003). A longitudinal content analysis of gender roles in children’s television advertisements: A 27 year review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 25(1), 71–81.
53.
MaldonadoR.TansuhajP.MuehlingD. D. (2003). The impact of gender on ad processing: A social identity perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 52(3), 1–14.
54.
MazzellaC.DurkinK.CeriniE.BuralliP. (1992). Sex roles stereotyping in Australian television advertisements. Sex Roles, 26(7/8), 243–259.
55.
McArthurL. Z.ReskoB. G. (1975). The portrayal of men and women in American television commercials. The Journal of Social Psychology, 97(2), 209–220.
56.
McCrackenG. (1988). Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
57.
McDonaldJ. (2013). Conforming to and resisting dominant gender norms: How male and female nursing students do and undo gender. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(5), 561–579.
58.
MilnerL. M.FodnessD. (1996). Product gender perceptions: The case of China. International Marketing Review, 13(4), 40–51.
59.
MortonL. P. (2002). Targeting generation Y. Public Relations Quarterly, 47(2), 46–48.
60.
NetoF.PintoI. (1998). Gender stereotypes in Portuguese television advertisements. Sex Roles, 39(1/2), 153–165.
61.
OrensteinP. (2011). Cinderella ate my daughter: Dispatches from the front lines of the new girlie-girl culture. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
62.
PalanK. M. (2001). Gender identity in consumer behavior research: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science Review. Retrieved 23 January 2017, from http://www.amsreview.org/articles/palan10-2001.pdf
63.
PattersonM.ElliotR. (2002). Negotiating masculinities: Advertising and the inversion of the male gaze. Consumption, Markets, and Culture, 5(3), 231–246.
64.
PenalozaL. (1994). Crossing boundaries/drawing lines: A look at the nature of gender boundaries and their impact on marketing research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(4), 359–379.
65.
QuesterP. G.KarunaratnaA.GohL. K. (2000). Self-congruity and product evaluation: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(6), 525–535.
66.
RounerD.SlaterM. D.Domenech-RodriguezM. (2003). Adolescent evaluation of gender role and sexual imagery in television advertisements. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47(3), 435–454.
67.
Rubie-DaviesC. M.LiuS.LeeK. K. (2013). Watching each journal: Portrayals of gender and ethnicity in television advertisements. Journal of Social Psychology, 153(2), 175–195.
68.
RutherfordP. (1994). The new icons: The art of television advertising. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
69.
SandhuN. (2016). Disadvantaging the disadvantaged: Television and women. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 1(2), 41–54.
70.
SandhuN. (2017). Consumer response to brand gender bending: An integrated review and future research agenda. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(2), 151–166.
71.
SandhuN. (2018). Preferred image of women on Indian television: A move from classic stereotypes. Antyajaa: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 3(1), 19–136.
72.
SandhuN.MahajanR.SharmaS. (2012). Gender in financial services advertising—Issues and implications. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, Greece.
73.
SandhuN.SinghD. (2017). Gender contamination in Indian automobile advertisements: Male acceptance or alienation?Paradigm, 21(2), 139–155.
SchroederJ. E.ZwickD. (2004). Mirrors of masculinity: Representation and identity in advertising images. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 7(1), 21–52.
76.
ShepardS. J.NicponM. F.HaleyJ. T.LindM.LiuW. M. (2011). Masculine norms, school attitudes, and psychosocial adjustment among gifted boys. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 12(2), 181–187.
77.
SiuW.AuA. K. (1997). Women in advertising: A comparison of television advertisements in China and Singapore. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 15(5), 235–243.
78.
SmithL. (1994). A content analysis of gender differences in children’s advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38(3), 323–338.
79.
SternB. B.GouldS. J.TewariS. (1993). Sex-typed service images: An empirical investigation of self-service variables. Service Industries Journal, 13(3), 74–96.
80.
StutevilleJ. R. (1971). Sexually polarized products and advertising strategy. Journal of Retailing, 47(2), 3–14.
81.
TarisT. W.BokI. A. (1998). On gender specificity of person characteristics in personnel advertisements: A study among future applicants. The Journal of Psychology, 132(6), 593–610.
82.
ThompsonC. J.HoltD. B. (2004). How do men grab the phallus? Gender tourism in everyday consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(3), 155–159.
83.
TuncayL.OtnesC. (2008). The use of persuasion management strategies by identity-vulnerable consumers: The case of urban heterosexual male shopper. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 487–499.
84.
VernaM. E. (1975). The female image in children’s TV commercials. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44(2), 329–348.
85.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 123–151.
86.
WetherellM.EdleyN. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9(3), 335–356.
87.
WhippleT. W.CourtneyA. E. (1980). How to portray women in television commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 25(2), 26–34.
88.
WoodJ. T. (2012). Gendered lives: Communication, gender and culture. Independence, KY: CengageBrain.
