Datsun Go surely and boldly disturbed the prevailing gender order in automobile advertisements by airing a series of ‘women only’ automobile advertisements on Indian television channels. This study uncovers the phenomenological response of men to this supposed gender contamination of a male-gendered product. The study captures the change in participants’ construction of gender identity meanings of the car and its purchase probability in response to exposure to differently gendered advertisements of the car. Results indicate the significant impact of gender signals in advertisements on the viewers’ perception of the gender identity meanings of the car. The study also provides evidence of male acceptance of gender bending in automobiles. Managerial implications and theoretical contributions are discussed.
AddelstonJ.StirrattM. (1996). The last bastion of masculinity: Gender politics at the citadel. In ChengC. (Ed.), Masculinities in organizations (pp. 54–76). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
3.
AliA.AliR.KumarD.HafeezM. H.GhufranB. (2012). Gender role portrayal in television advertisement: Evidence from Pakistan. Information Management and Business Review, 4(6), 340–351.
4.
AlreckP. L.SettleR. B.BelchM. A. (1982). Who responds to ‘gendered’ ads, and how?Journal of Advertising Research, 22(2), 25–31.
5.
AlvessonM.BillingY. D. (1997). Understanding gender and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.
6.
AveryJ. (2012). Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand gender-bending. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 322–336.
7.
BaileyA. A. (2006). A year in the life of the African-American male in advertising. The Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 83–104.
8.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
BellizziJ. A.MilnerL. (1991). Gender positioning of a traditionally male-dominant product. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(3), 72–79.
10.
BemS. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364.
BorgesonJ.RehnA. (2004). Gender economy and productive dualisms. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(4), 455–474.
13.
BrannonR. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint of manhood and what it’s done for us lately. In DavidD.BrannonR. (Eds), The forty-nine per cent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Random House.
14.
BretlD. J.CantorJ. (1988). The portrayal of men and women in U.S. television commercials: A recent content analysis and trends over 15 years. Sex Roles, 18(9/10), 595–609.
CuneenJ.SpencerN. E.RossS. R.ApostolopoulouA. (2007). Advertising portrayals of Indy’s female drivers: A perspective on the succession from Guthrie to Patrick. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 16(4), 209–217.
23.
CzarniawskaB. (2006). Doing gender unto the other: Fiction as a mode of studying gender discrimination in organizations. Gender, Work and Organizations, 13(3), 234–253.
24.
CzarniawskaB. (2013). Negotiating selves: Gender at work. Tamara-Journal of Critical Organization Inquiry, 11(1), 59–72.
25.
DangJ. P.VohraN. (2005). Role portrayals of men and women in Indian television advertising. Abhigyan, 23(1), 36–44.
26.
DasM. (2000). Men and women in Indian magazine advertisements: A preliminary report. Sex Roles, 43(9/10), 699–717.
DebevecK.IyerE. (1986). The influence of spokes-persons in altering a product’s gender image: Implications for advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 12–20.
33.
DoolittleJ.PepperR. (1975). Children’s TV ad content. Journal of Broadcasting, 19(2), 131–142.
34.
EaglyA. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
35.
FCBUlka Advertising. (2013, February19). Tata Indica Xeta-2005. If you still don’t get it, you gotta be dum. Retrieved 12March2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XcKh5guO
36.
FriedenL. R. (2013). The role of consumer gender identity and brand concept consistency in evaluating cross gender brand extensions. Retrieved 6February2017, from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4488/
37.
FurnhamA.BitarN. (1993). The stereotype portrayal of men and women in British advertisements. Sex Roles, 29(3/4), 297–310.
38.
GalinskyE.AumannK.BondJ. T. (2012). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home in the USA. In ShafferM. A.JoplinJ. R.HsuY. S. (Eds), Expanding the boundaries of work-family research: A vision for the future (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
39.
GentryJ. W.DoeringM.O’BrienT. V. (1978). Masculinity and femininity factors in product perception and self-image. In HuntK.ArborA. (Eds), Advances in consumer research (pp. 326–332). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
40.
HoltD. B.ThompsonC. J. (2004). Man-of-action-heroes: The pursuit of heroic masculinity in everyday consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 425–440.
Indian TV Commercials. (2013, October24). Chevrolet Beat new TVC 2013-Yami Gautam (Latest Indian TV Ad). Retrieved 12March2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fY9oKHWsbUI
43.
JoharG. V.MoreauP.SchwarzN. (2003). Gender typed advertisements and impression formation: The role of chronic and temporary accessibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 220–229.
44.
JohnsonT. W.WassersugR. J. (2010). Gender identity disorder outside the binary: When gender identity disorder-not otherwise specified is not good enough. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 597–598.
45.
JusterF. T. (1966). Consumer buying intensions and purchase probability. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
46.
KanungoR. N.PangS. (1973). Effects of human models on perceived product quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 172–178.
47.
KerrB. A. (1997). Smart girls. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
48.
KerrB. A.McKayR. (2014). Smart girls in the 21st century. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
49.
KerrB. A.MultonK. D. (2015). The development of gender identity, gender roles, and gender relations in gifted students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 183–191.
50.
KimmelM. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In BrodH.KaufmanM. (Eds), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 81–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
51.
KnupferN. N. (1998). Gender divisions across technology advertisements and the www: Implications for educational equity. Theory Into Practice, 37(1), 54–63.
52.
KramerL. (2005). The sociology of gender. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
53.
LaneR. C.SternbergD. (1985). Use of the automobile as a narcissistic object, extension of the self, and a personal metaphor. In StreanH. S. (Ed.), Love and narcissism in psychoanalytic practice (pp. 81–97). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
54.
LarsonM. S. (2001). Interactions, activities and gender in children’s television commercials: A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45(1), 41–56.
55.
LovdalL. T. (1989). Sex role messages in television commercials: An update. Sex Roles, 21(11/12), 715–724.
56.
LuptonB. (2000). Maintaining masculinity: Men who do ‘women’s work’. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 33–48.
57.
LuytR. (2011). Representations of gender in South African television advertising: A content analysis. Sex Roles, 65(5/6), 356–370.
58.
MacklinC.KolbeR. H. (1983). Sex role stereotyping in children’s advertising: Current and past trends. Journal of Advertising, 13(2), 34–42.
59.
MaherJ. K.ChildsN. M. (2003). A longitudinal content analysis of gender roles in children’s television advertisements: A 27 year review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 25(1), 71–81.
60.
MargaretW. (2011). Gender and automobility: Selling cars to American women after the Second World War. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(1), 57–72.
61.
MartinD. M.SchoutenJ. W.McAlexanderJ. H. (2006). Claiming the throttle: Multiple femininities in a hyper-masculine environment. Consumption, Markets, and Culture, 9(3), 171–205.
62.
McArthurL. Z.ReskoB. G. (1975). The portrayal of men and women in American television commercials. The Journal of Social Psychology, 97(2), 209–220.
63.
McDonaldJ. (2013). Conforming to and resisting dominant gender norms: How male and female nursing students do and undo gender. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(5), 561–579.
64.
NicholsonL. (1999). The play of reason: From the modern to the postmodern. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
PatowaryH. (2014). Portrayal of women in Indian mass media: An investigation. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 1(1), 84–92.
67.
PattersonM.ElliotR. (2002). Negotiating masculinities: Advertising and the inversion of the male gaze. Consumption, Markets, and Culture, 5(3), 231–246.
68.
PenalozaL. (1994). Crossing boundaries/drawing lines: A look at the nature of gender boundaries and their impact on marketing research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(4), 359–379.
PullenA.SimpsonR. (2009). Managing difference in feminized work: Men, otherness and social practice. Human Relations, 62(4), 561–587.
71.
RakD. S.McMullenL. M. (1987). Sex-role stereotyping in television commercials: A verbal response mode and content analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 19(1), 25–39.
RinalloD. (2007). Metro/Fashion/Tribes of men: Negotiating the boundaries of men’s legitimate consumption. In CovaB.KozinetsR. V.ShankarA. (Eds), Consumer tribes (pp. 76–92). Oxford: Elsevier.
74.
RounerD.SlaterM. D.Domenech-RodriguezM. (2003). Adolescent evaluation of gender role and sexual imagery in television advertisements. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47(3), 435–454.
75.
Rubie-DaviesC. M.LiuS.LeeK. K. (2013). Watching each other: Portrayals of gender and ethnicity in television advertisements. Journal of Social Psychology, 153(2), 175–195.
76.
RudmanL. A.BorgidaE. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(6), 493–517.
77.
RutherfordP. (1994). The new icons? The art of television advertising. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
78.
SandhuN. (2011). The truth behind the lies—Advertising and materialism. Advertising Express, 11(7), 16–19.
79.
SandhuN. (2016, February). Fuelling gender stereotypes: A content analysis of Indian automobile advertisements. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on CSR in Globalized World: Emerging Issues and Challenges, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, India.
80.
SandhuN. (2017). Consumer response to brand gender bending: An integrated review and future research agenda. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(2), 151–166.
81.
SandhuN.MahajanR.SharmaS. (2012, June). Gender in financial services advertising—Issues and implications. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, Greece.
82.
SandhuN.SinghD.BatraS. (2014). Corporate gender discrimination—Analysis and evaluation. International Journal of Organizational Behavior and Management Perspectives, 3(4), 1250–1257.
83.
SchafferS. J. (2005). Privileging the privileged: Gender in Indian advertising. New Delhi: Promilla & Co.
84.
SinghJ.SandhuN. (2011a). Impact of television commercials on the social and moral behavior of Indian viewers—Empirical evidence. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(7), 178–187.
85.
SinghJ.SandhuN. (2011b). Building ethical considerations into advertising practices—An Indian study. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(18), 291–301.
86.
SmithL. (1994). A content analysis of gender differences in children’s advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38(3), 323–338.
87.
TarisT. W.BokI. A. (1998). On gender specificity of person characteristics in personnel advertisements: A study among future applicants. The Journal of Psychology, 132(6), 593–610.
88.
ThompsonC. J.HoltD. B. (2004). How do men grab the phallus? Gender tourism in everyday consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(3), 155–159.
89.
TuncayL.OtnesC. (2008). The use of persuasion management strategies by identity-vulnerable consumers: The case of urban heterosexual male shopper. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 487–499.
90.
WellsB. E.TwengeJ. M.(2005). Changes in young people’s sexual behavior and attitudes, 1943–1999: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 249–267.
91.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 123–151.
92.
WilliamsC. L. (1995). Still a man’s world. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
93.
WoodJ. T. (2012). Gendered lives: Communication, gender and culture. Independence, KY: CengageBrain.
